Limits of Powers
- implied: not stated in the constitution
- Investigating how a statute is being administered enables Congress to assess whether federal agencies and departments are administering programs in an effective, efficient, and economical manner.
1. The Constitution;
2. Supreme Court decisions;
3. Specific Federal Laws;
4. and House and Senate rules.
- The Supreme Court has said: There is no general authority to expose the private affairs of individuals without justification in terms of the functions of the Congress . . . nor is the Congress a law enforcement or trial agency. These are functions of the executive and judicial departments of government. No inquiry is an end in itself; it must be related to, and in furtherance of, a legitimate task of the Congress.
- Key Point: There must be a legislative purpose to what Congress is doing.
- Ex: Trump Tax Returns
- Can congress require the supreme court to reopen a case once it made a final decision? NO (ex: Plaut v. spendthrift farm, inc. (1995))
*In order for the government to exist everybody needs to follow the rules (Rule of Law) Ex: If people do not follow the rules the government struggles (civil war: did not agree with no slavery)
- The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America
- Foreign Powers: Treaties, Executive agreements, Power recognition, War powers
- Domestic Powers: Execute the Law, Appointment and removal, Judicial power, Legislative powers
- Carry and effect the law
- Appoint officers to enforcing the law
- the president has all the executive power
- headed by a single individual
- Includes domestic and foreign powers:
- The Take Care Clause imposes a "duty" upon the President and also provides a source of presidential "power."
- Establishes Presidential Control Over Law Enforcement
- PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION: the longstanding authority of an agency charged with enforcing the law to decide where to focus its resources and whether or how to enforce, or not to enforce, the law against an individual.
o applies to the police and the district attorneys
o Choosing who will be prosecuted and who is not
o Police are humans (have their own biases/ prejudices)
o The problem is when prosecutional discretion becomes targative ex: police being racist
- AN IMPORTANT ASPECT OF THE TAKE CARE CLAUSE IS PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION
- Choose what to charge you with
- Example: Did the prosecutor get it right in the Jessie Smollett case? Dropped charges on Jessie Smollett(staged and lied about being a victim of a hate crime) because he bailed and did community service, That state attorney general has the power alone to decide to bring this guy to trial or not (people of power can influence that one official seen here in texts)
- Example: Did the prosecutor get it right in the Breonna Taylor case? Only charged with endangering the lives of people in the neighboring apartments, prosecutor choose not to charge on murder of Taylor
- Prosecutors are elected by the people
- Prosecutors force people to accept plea bargains, have an enormous amount of power
- Prosecutors can decide life and death of a person, and greatly directly affect their future
- Both sides of the political spectrum can agree on limiting their power because they are too powerful
- Adversarial System and Inquisitorial System
- There is a gender disparity of who are prosecutors
- The people who are enforcing the law at the state level are not a true reflection of the states demographic
- African American youths are 9 times and Latino youth are 4 times more likely than a white youth to receive an adult prison sentence for the same crime (This is enough of the disparity to ask if this gender disparity of district attorneys)
- Laws can be colorblind/ biased
- Police enforcement: biased
- Prosecutorial discretion
- The determination of whether to prosecute may not be based upon "race, religion, or other arbitrary classification," or infringe individual constitutional rights.
- Prosecutors have a special duty - imposed not only by their professional obligations but the Constitution itself - to ensure fairness in a criminal case.
- They engage in prosecutorial misconduct when they improperly or illegally act (or fail to act, when required to do so) in a way that causes a defendant to be wrongfully convicted or punished unjustifiably.
- Prosecutorial misconduct comes in many forms: criminal case, to deciding what charges to seek, to recommending a sentence after conviction - and prosecutorial misconduct can infect any stage of this process.
- Could the prosecutor be charged for a crime? YES
- Prosecutorial immunity is the absolute immunity (that is, protection) from civil liability that prosecutors have in initiating a prosecution and presenting the state's case.
- The Supreme Court in 1976 ruled that prosecutors cannot face civil lawsuits for prosecutorial abuses, no matter how severe.”
- President's issue this alone then go to judicial review
- An executive order is a signed, written, and published directive from the President of the United States that manages operations of the executive branch of the federal government.
- Every American president has issued at least one, totaling more than (as of this writing) 13,731 since George Washington took office in 1789.
- The authority for the president to issue executive orders is rooted in Article 2, Section 3 of the Constitution, which states that the president "shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed."
- Franklin D. Roosevelt issued the most executive orders as president
- Federal courts have created rules as to when executive orders should be overturned, though this happens rarely
- Presidents have increasingly tuned to executive orders when their policy priorities stall in congress
- through agency rulemaking (main way they do it)
- negotiate foreign treaties
- issue executive orders (main way they do it)
- EX: YOUNGSTOWN SHEET & TUBE CO. V. SAWYER (1952), TRUMP'S EXECUTIVE ORDER BANNING TIK TOK
- Through administrative agency rulemaking
- Propose legislation to Congress
- Negotiate foreign treaties
- A government body authorized to implement legislative directives by developing more precise and technical rules than possible in a legislative setting.
- There is no one all-encompassing definition of an agency. Instead, the term “agency” can mean different things in different contexts, depending on what statute is at issue.
- The most important definition of “agency” is found in the federal Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The APA provides the “default” procedures that agencies must follow when conducting rulemaking and adjudications unless an agency’s organic statute provides for other procedures. “agency” means each authority of the Government of the United States, whether or not it is within or subject to review by another agency, but does not include—the Congress; the courts of the United States; the governments of the territories or possessions of the United States; the government of the District of Columbia; or [...].
- The definition includes all executive branch agencies, including the independent regulatory agencies, even those that are within another authority.
- For example, the DOJ is an agency composed of a number of subunits, such as the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Each of these divisions is an agency insofar as it is an "authority" of the government.
- Independent Agencies
- Departments are led by Cabinet secretaries.
- The president can fire the cabinet officials but not the head of the independent agencies
- We don't want politics effecting these agencies (example: politics influence in space exploration)
- They are somewhat insulated from presidential control because the president's power to dismiss the agency head or a member is limited.
- Purpose is to isolate these governments from politics
- Independent Executive Agencies: Subject to presidential control, Similar to cabinet departments, Organized much like cabinet departments but don't have cabinet status Ex: NASA, Environmental Protection Agency
- Independent Regulatory Commission: Very protected from being fired by the president, Are federal agencies created by an act of congress that are independent of the executive departments, These agencies are meant to impose and enforce regulations free of political influence
- Government Cooperation's: Subject to presidential control, Set up to carry out business functions, Ex: post office
- When Congress passes a law, it often directs the President, members of the President's Cabinet, or other lower officials to create regulations.
- Regulations are created in a different manner than the statutes created by Congress, but regulations also have the force of law because they are created with the authority of Congress.
- To delegate rulemaking authority to those with a significant amount of expertise who can "fill in" technical details of programs that Congress created in statute.
- Congress simply does not have the same depth of expertise that agencies may have.
- Delegating authority to agencies can enable Congress to focus on "big picture" issues rather than spending its time and resources debating all the technical details required to fully implement a complex public policy.
- The Supreme Court, though, has recognized that Congress has broad constitutional authority over the establishment and shape of the federal bureaucracy.
- This power stems principally from the combination of: (congress is to create the judicial branch, congress became the judicial branch) Article II, Section 2, which authorizes the appointment of "officers" to positions "which shall be established by law"; and Article I, Section 8 (enumerated powers)
- It is a principle of constitutional and administrative law that holds that legislative bodies cannot delegate their legislative powers to executive agencies or private entities. [back then congress want needed that much because we didn’t have this advancement in technology (Creation of transportation, NASA)]
- In other words, lawmakers cannot allow others to make laws.
- The doctrine is designed to protect Congress’s lawmaking role within the separation of powers and, ultimately, to protect against a tyrannical consolidation of power in the executive branch.
- The constitutional question is whether Congress has supplied an intelligible principle to guide the delegee's use of discretion.
- So the answer requires construing the challenged statute to figure out what task it delegates and what instructions it provides.
- Congress needs to give the agencies a very precise rules in congresses' vision
- Rulemaking function(legislative): Study a particular social problem, Formulate a draft of administrative rules, Solicit public comments on proposed rules, Promulgate rules
- Enforcement function(executive): investigative alleged instance where laws or rules are violated, Impose sanctions or orders to cease and desist
- Adjudicatory function(judicial): Hear cases of alleged law or rule violations brought by the agency, Issue ruling as to the facts and an order regarding the application of the law or rule to the facts, Provide opportunity to appeal
- Are agencies effectively the "fourth branch" of government?
- What is a Bureaucracy? A bureaucracy is a group of non-elected officials within a government or other institution that implements the rules, laws, ideas, and functions of their institution.
- The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish (up to congress to establish the courts, if congress wanted there would be no federal courts just one supreme court)
- Number of justices is set by statute
- President nominates, and Senate confirms
- Appointed for life
- No required qualifications
- Interpreting Statutes
- Policymaking
- Judicial review is not only a potent tool for the judiciary—it is also a controversial one, in that unelected federal judges possess the power to undo the decisions of the branches that are theoretically the most responsive to the people.
- The Framers of the Constitution designed the judicial branch to be a countermajoritarian branch. Why? Effect? Puts the judicial at odds with the majority view, they are not supposed to make decisions of what the people want but what the constitution requires, The judiciary are independent, not effected by politics
- On one hand, an independent judiciary is needed to ensure that the core norms of our society, as embodied in the Constitution, are enforced against temporary populist interests
- On the other hand, when a court “declares unconstitutional a legislative act or the action of an elected executive, [the court] thwarts” the enforcement of an act that presumably reflects the will of the voters
- As a result, judicial review necessarily invites conflict with the political branches
- There is significant debate over which sources and methods of construction the Court should consult when interpreting the Constitution.
- Common Modes of Constitutional Interpretation: Textualism, Original meaning, Pragmatism, Judicial Precedent, Moral Reasoning, National Identity, Structuralism (Formalism, Functionalism), Historical Practices
- Textualists usually believe there is an objective meaning of the text, and they do not typically inquire into questions regarding the intent of the drafters of the Constitution and its amendments when deriving meaning from the text.
- Originalists generally agree that the Constitution's text had an "objectively identifiable" or public meaning at the time of the Founding that has not changed over time, and the task of judges and Justices is to construct this original meaning.
- READ THE WORDS BUT UNDERSTAND THE WORDS IN THE WORLDS/ERAS THEY WERE WRITTEN (OPPOSITE TO THE PRAGMATIC APPROACH)
- "Living document"
- Loose constructionalism
- That is, pragmatist approaches often involve the Court weighing or balancing the probable practical consequences of one interpretation of the Constitution against other interpretations.
- "originalism
- Strict constructionism
- Judicial precedent provides possible principles, rules, or standards to govern judicial decisions in future cases with arguably similar facts.
- Although the Court routinely purports to rely upon precedent, it is difficult to say how often precedent has actually constrained the Court's decisions because the Justices plainly have latitude in how broadly or narrowly they choose to construe their prior decisions.
- Under this approach, some constitutional text makes reference to terms that are infused with certain moral concepts, such as "equal protection" or "due process of law."
- The moral or ethical arguments based on the text often pertain to the limits of government authority over the individual (i.e., individual rights).
- The Court has derived general moral principles from the broad language of the Fourteenth Amendment in cases involving state laws or actions affecting individual rights.
- This national ethos is defined as the unique character of American institutions, the American people's distinct national identity, and "the role within [the nation's public institutions] of the American people."
- Drawing inferences from the design of the Constitution gives rise to some of the most important relationships that everyone agrees the Constitution establishes—
- the relationships among the three branches of the federal government (commonly called separation of powers or checks and balances);
- the relationship between the federal and state governments (known as federalism); and
- the relationship between the government and the people.
- Two basic approaches seek to make sense of these relationships: Formalism(Posits that the Constitution sets forth all the ways in which federal power may be shared, allocated, or distributed) and Functionalism(Treats the Constitution's text as having firmly spelled out the relationship among the three federal branches only at their apexes, but otherwise left it to be worked out in practice how power may be distributed or shared below the apexes)
- Prior decisions of the political branches, particularly their long-established, historical practices, are an important source of constitutional meaning to many judges, academics, and lawyers.
- Courts have viewed historical practices as a source of the Constitution's meaning in cases involving questions about the separation of powers, federalism, and individual rights, particularly when the text provides no clear answer.
- For example, the changed understanding of the stigmatic effect of racial segregation in public schools.