question
Adjudication
answer
any activity, other than rule-making or employee discipline, in which a determination is required by law to be made only on the record and after a hearing
question
due process protections of the 14th amendment and NY Constitution
answer
short and plain statement of the matters asserted, opportunity for hearing within reasonable time, reasonable notice of the hearing, opportunity to present written argument on issues of law and evidence on issues of fact
question
how are due process requirements different for adjudicatory proceedings than criminal proceedings
answer
the specificity requirements are different in that it only need be reasonably specific, in light of all relevant circumstances, to apprise the party whose rights are being determined of the charges against him or her and to allow for preparation of an adequate defense
question
what rights do parties have in administrative hearings and what rules apply?
answer
parties have the right to cross-examination, right to be accompanied, represented and advised by counsel; the rules of evidence do not apply, but the rules of privilege do
question
when do res judicator and collateral estoppel doctrines apply to administrative hearings?
answer
they apply to quasi-judicial administrative determinations that are made pursuant to adjudicatory authority of an agency employing procedures substantially similar to those used in a court of law, but not where a party is a nominal party or did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate the material issue before the agency
question
in administrative investigations, what must an agency show in order to obtain a subpoena?
answer
they must show that the information sought in the subpoena is reasonably related to a proper subject of inquiry and that there is some basis for inquisitorial action
question
who has standing to seek judicial review of an administrative decision?
answer
persons who have suffered an unfavorable administrative decision and those that have a stake in the outcome of the administrative process, but whose injury is less direct
question
what is the test for evaluating standing for the judicial review of administrative decisions?
answer
1) some harmful effect, whether economic or non-economic AND 2) interest sought to be protect must be arguable within zone of interest to be protected by state under which agency has acted
question
what are the exceptions to the exhaustion of administrative remedies?
answer
agency actions that are challenged as either unconstitutional or wholly beyond the agency's grant of power or when resort to administrative remedy would be futile or its pursuit would cause irreparable injury, BUT unless claim is that underlying statute is unconstitutional in its entirety, the mere assertion of a violation of constitutional right does not alway avoid the exhaustion requirement
question
when is an administrative agency action final and ripe for review?
answer
if it imposes an obligation, denies a right or fixes some legal relationship as a consummation of the administrative process, resulting in an actual, concrete injury, BUT interlocutory determinations may be reviewable if extraordinary measures exist
question
what is the SOL for judicial review of a proceedings against a body or officer?
answer
4 months after the termination to review becomes final and binding
question
What actions can one take to challenge agency actions that are not reviewable under Art. 78?
answer
Declaratory judgment under CPLR 3001
question
Why would an agency action not be reviewable under Art. 78
answer
Because article 78 proceedings are special proceedings, subject to specific procedural requirements, and they are limited to question of law
question
what is the standard of review for an agency decision based on agency interpretation within their expertise?
answer
rational basis or whether it was affected by an error of law or was arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion
question
what must determination of fact be based on?
answer
substantial evidence which is relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion
question
what is the standard review for agency determinations involving finds of fact made without a formal adjudicatory hearing being require by statute or law
answer
rational basis
question
what is the standard of review for agency discretionary acts
answer
rational basis for the exercise of discretion AND the act complained of is arbitrary and capricious meaning "taken without sound basis in reason or regard to the facts"
question
what is the standard of review for administrative disciplinary penalties
answer
if the punishment constitutes abuse of discretion; however, the penalty must be upheld unless it is so disproportionate to the offense in light of all the circumstances as the shock one's sense of fairness
question
what is the law that requires public bodies to conduct all portions of any meeting in venues open to the general public on reasonable advance notice to the public, unless the public body calls an executive session
answer
Open Meetings Law
question
when can an executive session be called
answer
only by motion on majority vote of the public body in public session, and the motion must identify general topics to be discussed in the executive session