Using the resources from this module, list several general principles that
you believe are important for sound questionnaire design. Then choose
one of the questionnaires listed below and discuss the ways the
questionnaire fits or violates your principles. It is fully understood that
several of your principles may not easily be applied to these
questionnaires because you do not know the exact background of how
the scales were developed. Instead, focus on the principles you
developed regarding item wording, response options, question order,
and so on.
Big 5 Personality Inventory (Goldberg, 1993) PDF: One of the most
commonly used measures of personality; scale on pages 3–4, scoring
on page 4
Procrastination Scale (Lay, 1986) PDF: A scale intended to measure
procrastination in student populations; scoring information on the second
page
Disgust Scale (Haidt, McCauley, & Rozin, 1994; Modified by Olatunji et
al., 2007) Word Document: A scale intended to measure disgust; scoring
information at the bottom of the page
When responding to your classmates, discuss the different principles you
developed and how they compare and contrast to those of your
classmates.
https://snhu-media.snhu.edu/files/course_repository/graduate/psy/psy520/psy_520_big_five_inventory_mod2
https://snhu-media.snhu.edu/files/course_repository/graduate/psy/psy520/psy_520_procrastination_scale_mod2
https://snhu-media.snhu.edu/files/course_repository/graduate/psy/psy520/psy_520_disgust_scale_mod2
https://snhu-media.snhu.edu/files/course_repository/graduate/psy/psy520/psy_520_disgust_scale_mod2
To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric PDF
document.
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lor/viewer/viewFile.d2lfile/1247330/720,-1/
Discussion Rubric: Graduate
Course: PSY-520-X3293 Research Methods in Psych II 23TW3
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Comprehension / 20
Timeliness / 10
Engagement / 20
2
0 points
Develops an initial
post with an
organized, clear point
of
view or idea using
rich and significant
detail
18 points
Develops an initial
post with a point of
view or idea using
appropriate detail
14 points
Develops an initial
post with a point of
view or idea but with
some gaps in
organization and
detail
0 points
Does not develop an
initial post with an
organized point of
view or idea
10 points
N/A
This level is not
applicable for
grading of this
criterion.
10 points
Submits initial post
on time
7 points
Submits initial post
one day late
0 points
Submits initial post
two or more days late
20 points
Provides relevant and
meaningful response
posts with clarifying
explanation and
detail
18 points
Provides relevant
response posts with
some explanation and
detail
14 points
Provides somewhat
relevant response
posts with some
explanation and
detail
0 points
Provides response
posts that are generic
with little explanation
or detail
Total / 100
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Critical Thinking / 30
Writing (Mechanics) / 20
30 points
Draws insightful
conclusions that are
thoroughly defended
with evidence and
examples
27 points
Draws informed
conclusions that are
justified with
evidence
21 points
Draws logical
conclusions
0 points
Does not draw logical
conclusions
20 points
Initial post and
responses are easily
understood, clear,
and concise using
proper citation
methods where
applicable with no
errors in
citations
18 points
Initial post and
responses are easily
understood using
proper citation
methods where
applicable with few
errors in citations
14 points
Initial post and
responses are
understandable using
proper citation
methods where
applicable with a
number of errors in
citations
0 points
Initial post and
responses are not
understandable and
do not use proper
citation methods
where applicable
Overall Score
Points earned out of 100
91 points minimum
The overall submission earned 91
points or more. Final calculation of
grades can be found in the
gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
71 points minimum
The overall submission earned 71
points or more. Final calculation of
grades can be found in the
gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
1 point minimum
The overall submission earned 1
points or more. Final calculation of
grades can be found in the
gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
0 points minimum
The overall submission earned 0
points or more. Final calculation of
grades can be found in the
gradebook.
Using the resources from this module, list several general principles that
you believe are important for sound questionnaire design. Then choose
one of the questionnaires listed below and discuss the ways the
questionnaire fits or violates your principles. It is fully understood that
several of your principles may not easily be applied to these
questionnaires because you do not know the exact background of how
the scales were developed. Instead, focus on the principles you
developed regarding item wording, response options, question order,
and so on.
Big 5 Personality Inventory (Goldberg, 1993) PDF: One of the most
commonly used measures of personality; scale on pages 3–4, scoring
on page 4
Procrastination Scale (Lay, 1986) PDF: A scale intended to measure
procrastination in student populations; scoring information on the second
page
Disgust Scale (Haidt, McCauley, & Rozin, 1994; Modified by Olatunji et
al., 2007) Word Document: A scale intended to measure disgust; scoring
information at the bottom of the page
When responding to your classmates, discuss the different principles you
developed and how they compare and contrast to those of your
classmates.
https://snhu-media.snhu.edu/files/course_repository/graduate/psy/psy520/psy_520_big_five_inventory_mod2
https://snhu-media.snhu.edu/files/course_repository/graduate/psy/psy520/psy_520_procrastination_scale_mod2
https://snhu-media.snhu.edu/files/course_repository/graduate/psy/psy520/psy_520_disgust_scale_mod2
https://snhu-media.snhu.edu/files/course_repository/graduate/psy/psy520/psy_520_disgust_scale_mod2
To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric PDF
document.
https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/lor/viewer/viewFile.d2lfile/1247330/720,-1/
Discussion Rubric: Graduate
Course: PSY-520-X3293 Research Methods in Psych II 23TW3
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Comprehension / 20
Timeliness / 10
Engagement / 20
2
0 points
Develops an initial
post with an
organized, clear point
of
view or idea using
rich and significant
detail
18 points
Develops an initial
post with a point of
view or idea using
appropriate detail
14 points
Develops an initial
post with a point of
view or idea but with
some gaps in
organization and
detail
0 points
Does not develop an
initial post with an
organized point of
view or idea
10 points
N/A
This level is not
applicable for
grading of this
criterion.
10 points
Submits initial post
on time
7 points
Submits initial post
one day late
0 points
Submits initial post
two or more days late
20 points
Provides relevant and
meaningful response
posts with clarifying
explanation and
detail
18 points
Provides relevant
response posts with
some explanation and
detail
14 points
Provides somewhat
relevant response
posts with some
explanation and
detail
0 points
Provides response
posts that are generic
with little explanation
or detail
Total / 100
Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score
Critical Thinking / 30
Writing (Mechanics) / 20
30 points
Draws insightful
conclusions that are
thoroughly defended
with evidence and
examples
27 points
Draws informed
conclusions that are
justified with
evidence
21 points
Draws logical
conclusions
0 points
Does not draw logical
conclusions
20 points
Initial post and
responses are easily
understood, clear,
and concise using
proper citation
methods where
applicable with no
errors in
citations
18 points
Initial post and
responses are easily
understood using
proper citation
methods where
applicable with few
errors in citations
14 points
Initial post and
responses are
understandable using
proper citation
methods where
applicable with a
number of errors in
citations
0 points
Initial post and
responses are not
understandable and
do not use proper
citation methods
where applicable
Overall Score
Points earned out of 100
91 points minimum
The overall submission earned 91
points or more. Final calculation of
grades can be found in the
gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
71 points minimum
The overall submission earned 71
points or more. Final calculation of
grades can be found in the
gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
1 point minimum
The overall submission earned 1
points or more. Final calculation of
grades can be found in the
gradebook.
Points earned out of 100
0 points minimum
The overall submission earned 0
points or more. Final calculation of
grades can be found in the
gradebook.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
