Last week, you began searching in the Walden Library for peer-reviewed research articles on your social work topic of interest. What have you found so far? What is missing? Take stock of your search results and consider whether you need to adjust your search terms to expand your results or use limiters or filters to narrow them down.
LIBRARY SEARCHING II
Last week, you began searching in the Walden Library for peer-reviewed research articles on your social work topic of interest. What have you found so far? What is missing? Take stock of your search results and consider whether you need to adjust your search terms to expand your results or use limiters or filters to narrow them down.
The research process involves repeated consultation with the existing literature to understand what is known on the topic—and what is not known. The “not known,” in other words the gap, indicates the need for further investigation in the form of a research study.
For this Assignment, you continue searching in the Walden Library for three more peer-reviewed research articles. You also refine your use of APA style in your referencing.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
TO PREPARE
· Review any feedback you have received on your Week 2 Library Searching Assignment and revise accordingly.
· Search for at least three additional peer-reviewed research articles on your topic that have been published within the past 5 years.
BY DAY 7
Submit your updated Library Searching document from last week, adding
at least three new peer-reviewed research articles
for a total of six.
· Ensure that you have referenced the articles in APA Style.
· Include a brief explanation of each article’s appropriateness to your topic.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
Turnitin Drafts from the
Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
WK3Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on
Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on
Upload File and select
Submit Assignment for review.
references
· Yegidis, B. L., Weinbach, R. W., & Myers, L. L. (2018).
Research methods for social workers (8th ed.). Pearson.
· Chapter 2: Ethical Issues in Research (pp. 24–51)
· DeAngelis, T. (2015).
In search of cultural competenceLinks to an external site.
.
American Psychological Association: Monitor on Psychology, 46(3). https://www.apa.org/monitor/2015/03/cultural-competence
· National Association of Social Workers. (n.d.).
Code of ethics
Links to an external site.
. https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
· Scharff, D. P., Mathews, K. J., Jackson, P., Hoffsuemmer, J., Martin, E., & Edwards, D. (2010).
More than Tuskegee: Understanding mistrust about research participationLinks to an external site.
.
Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 21(3), 879–897.
https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.0.0323
Media
· NIHRtv. (2020, July 1).
An introduction to cultural competence in research
Links to an external site.
[Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VEibZOP01c
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 11 minutes.
· Walden University, LLC. (2013).
Parker family (Episode 4) [Video]. In
Sessions. https://class.waldenu.edu
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 1 minute.
Rubric
SOCW_6301_Week3_Assignment_Rubric
| SOCW_6301_Week3_Assignment_Rubric | |||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSubmit your updated Library Searching document from last week, adding at least three new peer-reviewed research articles for a total of six. |
12 to >10.68 pts Exceeds Expectation 90–100% Response meets expectations and exceeds by providing more than six peer-reviewed research articles. 10.68 to >9.48 pts Meets Expectation 80–89% Response provides references to six peer-reviewed research articles from within the past 5 years. 9.48 to >8.28 pts Fair 70–79% Response references five peer-reviewed research articles, articles are not peer-reviewed, or articles are not from within the past 5 years. 8.28 to >0 pts Needs Improvement 0–69% Response references four or fewer peer-reviewed research articles. |
12 pts |
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEnsure that you have referenced the articles in APA Style. |
12 to >10.68 pts Exceeds Expectation 90–100% Response meets expectations and exceeds by providing error-free APA Style references. 10.68 to >9.48 pts Meets Expectation 80–89% Student applies APA Style in the references with minor errors. 9.48 to >8.28 pts Fair 70–79% Student attempts to apply APA Style in the references but with major errors. 8.28 to >0 pts Needs Improvement 0–69% Little or no attempt has been made to apply APA Style. |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInclude a brief explanation of each article’s appropriateness to your topic. |
36 to >32.04 pts Exceeds Expectation 90–100% Response meets expectations and provides additional specificity and relevance through details and examples from each of the new articles to explain the relationship to the research topic. 32.04 to >28.44 pts Meets Expectation 80–89% Response clearly and concisely explains in the student’s own words how each of the new articles is related to the research topic. 28.44 to >24.84 pts Fair 70–79% Response provides an incomplete or vague explanation for how each of the new articles is related to the research topic. Response may provide a general explanation for all articles rather than explaining each one individually. Response may rely on direct quotes from the articles. 24.84 to >0 pts Needs Improvement 0–69% Response makes little or no attempt to explain how the new articles relate to the research topic. |
36 pts |
|
|
Total Points: 60 |
Previous
Next
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
