CLC – Quality Models – Rubric
Description of Each Model 12 points
Criteria Description
Description of Each Model
5. Target 12 points
A description of each quality model is present and thorough.
4. Acceptable 11.04 points
A description of each quality model is present and detailed.
3. Approaching 10.56 points
A description of each quality model is present.
2. Insufficient 9.6 points
A description of each quality model is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
A description of each quality model is not present.
Brief History of Each Model 13 points
Criteria Description
Brief History of Each Model
5. Target 13 points
A brief history of each quality model is present and thorough.
4. Acceptable 11.96 points
A brief history of each quality model is present and detailed.
3. Approaching 11.44 points
A brief history of each quality model is present.
Collapse All
2. Insufficient 10.4 points
A brief history of each quality model is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
A brief history of each quality model is not present.
A description and examples of how each quality model Can be Applied to
the Health
Care Setting
15 points
Criteria Description
A description and examples of how each quality model Can be Applied to the Health
Care Setting
5. Target 15 points
A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health
care setting is present and thorough.
4. Acceptable 13.8 points
A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health
care setting is present and detailed.
3. Approaching 13.2 points
A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health
care setting is present.
2. Insufficient 12 points
A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health
care setting is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.
Presentation of Content 30 points
Criteria Description
Presentation of Content
5. Target 30 points
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to
each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers.
The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
4. Acceptable 27.6 points
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting
information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive
information from reliable sources.
3. Approaching 26.4 points
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some
inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.
2. Insufficient 24 points
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong
sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information Includes
Layout 10 points
Criteria Description
Layout
5. Target 10 points
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with
appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in
length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance
the readability of the text.
4. Acceptable 9.2 points
The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to
be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for
headings and text.
3. Approaching 8.8 points
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the
fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long
paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
2. Insufficient 8 points
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting
with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is
difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy
background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
f
Language Use and Audience Awareness 10 points
Criteria Description
Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.
5. Target 10 points
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word
choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline,
and scope.
4. Acceptable 9.2 points
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for
the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
3. Approaching 8.8 points
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
2. Insufficient 8 points
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are
present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech
appropriately.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer
Mechanics of Writing 5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use
5. Target 5 points
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.
4. Acceptable 4.6 points
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.
3. Approaching 4.4 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to
the reader.
2. Insufficient 4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Documentation of Sources 5 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as
appropriate to assignment and style)
5. Target 5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is free of error.
4. Acceptable 4.6 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is
mostly correct.
3. Approaching 4.4 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some
formatting errors may be present.
2. Insufficient 4 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to
assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Total 100 points
CLC – Quality Models
Start Date & Time
Jan 10 2023, 12:00 AM
Status
Upcoming
Rubric
View Rubric
Assessment Traits
Group
Assessment Description
This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.
The purpose of this assignment is to examine quality models used in health care. With your CLC group, create a 12-15 slide PowerPoint on Lean, Six Sigma, and 5S quality models. Include the following in your presentation:
1. A description of each quality model.
2. A brief history of each quality model.
3. A description and examples of how each quality model can be applied to the health care setting.
4. Include a title slide, references slide, and comprehensive speaker notes.
5. Use a minimum of four peer-reviewed, scholarly references as evidence.
Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
