a list of your themes, and explain how these topics relate to the gap in the literature you identified.
Article one
Lethal injection [electronic resource] :
capital
punishment in
Texas during the modern era / Jon Sorensen and Rocky LeAnn Pilgrim ; foreword by Evan J. Mandery.
Language:
English
Authors:
Sorensen, Jonathan R.
(Jonathan Roger), 1965-
Publication Information:
Austin, TX : University of
Texas Press,
2006
.
Edition:
1st ed.
Publication Date:
2006
Physical Description:
xi, 222 p. : ill.
Publication Type:
Book; eBook
Document Type:
Bibliographies; Electronic; Non-fiction; Government documents; Electronic document
Subject Terms:
Capital
punishment —
Texas
Lethal injection (Execution) —
Texas
Punishment —
Texas
Electronic books
Content Notes:
The modern era — Deterrence : does it prevent others from committing murder? — Incapacitation : does it keep them from killing again? — Retribution : do they deserve to die? — Administration : is the death penalty carried out impartially, reliably, and efficiently? — Conclusion.
Notes:
Includes bibliographical references (p. [203]-214) and index.
Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI : ProQuest, 2015. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest affiliated libraries.
Other Authors:
Pilgrim, Rocky LeAnn
, 1978-
ProQuest (Firm)
OCLC:
614534999
URL:
http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/waldenu/detail.action?docID=3443247
Note: Click to View
Accession Number:
wal.EBC3443247
Database:
Walden University Library Catalog
______________________________________________________________________________
Article two
STUCK BETWEEN GROWING UP AND GROWN UP: DELAYING THE SENTENCING PHASE FOR YOUNG ADULTS FACING
CAPITAL
PUNISHMENT IN
TEXAS
Authors:
Serrano, Bonnie
Source:
Texas Tech Law Review. Summer,
2021
, Vol. 53 Issue 4, p843, 870 p.
Publisher Information:
Texas Tech University School of Law, 2021.
Publication Year:
2021
Subject Terms:
Young adults — Psychological aspects — Laws, regulations and rules
Age (Law) — Laws, regulations and rules
Evidence, Expert — Laws, regulations and rules
Cruel and unusual
punishment — Laws, regulations and rules
Capital
punishment — Standards — Laws, regulations and rules
Juvenile offenders — Psychological aspects — Laws, regulations and rules
Maturation (Psychology) — Analysis
Evidence, Character — Laws, regulations and rules
Danger (Law) — Standards — Laws, regulations and rules
Government regulation
Law
Roper v. Missouri ex rel. Simmons (543 U.S. 551 (2005))
United
States
Constitution (U.S. Const. amend. 8)
Subject Geographic:
Texas
United States
States
Language:
English
ISSN:
0564-6197
Rights:
Copyright 2021 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
COPYRIGHT 2021
Texas Tech University School of Law
Accession Number:
edsgcl.674607828
Database:
Gale OneFile: LegalTrac
Understanding The Effects of the Death Penalty
To locate the five articles, I utilized two databases: ProQuest and Google Scholar. These two databases contain a lot of peer-reviewed articles, which are suitable for this task. The databases are also free to access, which was essential in identifying what is ideal for this task. The keywords I used were “effects of the death penalty in America.” When choosing articles, I chose the ones which appealed to me and were related to the program I am currently taking. The goal was to understand the death penalty from different aspects, which not many people do.
Kastellec (2020) was the first article I chose to assess. Racism and racial inequality have emerged as serious issues in the world today. The topic is a sore spot for society and has affected almost every societal pillar. This also includes the death penalty. Kastellec (2020) performs a quantitative analysis to determine the role that racism plays in the death penalty to determine the racial discrepancy that appears when issuing the death penalty. This is a critical issue to understand.
Godcharles et al. (2019) also give vital insights regarding the racial split and gender disparity in death penalty support, as well as the role that empathy plays in bridging the support gap. According to the report, while many people in the country support the death sentence, African Americans and women support it less. The study contributes to determining if empathy has a role in support for the practice. This article is important because these individuals will be on the jury, and understanding their state of mind concerning the death penalty will be beneficial in the future.
Sharp (2005) is also a good article for understanding the death penalty. The article discusses the impact of the death sentence on the accused’s relatives and loved ones. Often, when we advocate for the death penalty, the criminal justice system forgets that there are other victims of the act. The story is inspired by Anna Hauptmann, the spouse of Bruno Richard Hauptmann, who was charged with the murder of Charles Lindbergh’s baby. Bruno was sentenced to death despite many thinking he was innocent. The article highlights the suffering that family members of those sent to death row face. This is a perspective that many in my program, including me, may lack.
Desai and Garrett (2018) explain how the death penalty in the contemporary world. The article explains that the practice has declined and that only a few are engaging in the practice anymore. There have also been cases where individuals sent to death row keep appealing until the case is thrown out. This essay serves to put into perspective a fact about the death sentence that the media and society are unaware of: it is not a widespread occurrence.
Wu (2022) produces an essay in which she explains qualitative analysis study that examines the influence of a high false conviction rate on the death sentence. The study intended to ascertain the impact of a wrongful conviction on a potential jury member. People who learned of a false conviction were less inclined to support the death penalty, according to the research. This exemplifies the impact of a mistaken conviction on the death sentence.
The link between these articles is that they all explain a different aspect of the death penalty, one that many do not know. This is why I chose these articles. They explain the death penalty from aspects that were previously hard to understand unless through reading about them.
References
Desai, A., & Garrett, B. L. (2018). The state of the death penalty. Notre Dame L. Rev., 94, 1255.
Godcharles, B. D., Rad, J. D., Heide, K. M., Cochran, J. K., & Solomon, E. P. (2019). Can empathy close the racial divide and gender gap in death penalty support?. Behavioral sciences & the law, 37(1), 16-37.
Kastellec, J. P. (2021). Race, context, and judging on the Courts of Appeals: Race-based panel effects in death penalty cases. Justice System Journal, 42(3-4), 394-415.
Sharp, S. F. (2005). Hidden victims: The effects of the death penalty on families of the accused. Rutgers University Press.
Wu, S. (2022). The effect of wrongful conviction rate on death penalty support: a research note. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 18(4), 871-884.