navigating conflict as a good leader
Read three scholarly articles on nursing and conflict management. Complete an annotated bibliography by summarizing and critically analyzing each article separately (250–300 words for each article’s annotated bibliography).
For each article, determine the following:
· Select relevant sources.
· Summarize the purpose of the article, point, or argument that the author is attempting to make.
· Analyze the quality of the article by providing relevant details about the author’s credentials and authority to write the article, the level of writing and intended audience, the legitimacy of the content, and any limitations or weaknesses of the author’s or the writing.
· Evaluate the value of the article content to assignment objectives, course objectives, and nursing in general.
Annotated Bibliography Rubric
Note: An appropriate scholarly resource for this assignment is a current (within five years) evidence-based practice article from a peer-reviewed
journal. Review assignment instructions for any additional requirements such as number of annotations to include.
Annotated Bibliography Rubric – 100 Points
Criteria Exemplary
Exceeds Expectations
Advanced
Meets Expectations
Intermediate
Needs
Improvement
Novice
Inadequate
Total
Points
Identifies
Relevant
Sources
Selected
articles:
Relate directly to the topic and
report results of empirical
research studies conducted by
the authors.
1
5 points
Relate directly to the
topic and include two
original research
studies.
1
3 points
May or may not
relate directly to
the topic and
include only one
original
research study.
11 points
Do not clearly
relate to the topic
and do not include
original research.
10 points
1
5
Annotation
summarizes
the article’s
Purpose
Point or
argument
Each
annotation:
Summarizes in the student’s own
words—the purpose of the study,
sample description, tool(s) used,
significant findings, and point or
argument that the author is trying
to make.
20 points
Summarizes in the
student’s own words—
the purpose of the
article and point or
argument that the
author is trying to
make.
1
7 points
Summarizes the
purpose of the
article with
reliance on
quotations.
15 points
Summarizes the
article with
reliance on
quotations and
without a clear
identification of
purpose.
13 points
20
Annotation
analyzes
quality of
each article’s
Author
credentials
and authority
Level of
writing
Intended
audience
Legitimacy of
content
Limitations/
weaknesses
Each
annotation:
Provides relevant detail to
analyze each component of
criteria.
20 points
Analyzes each
component of criteria
but may miss relevant
detail for one area.
17 points
Misses relevant
detail or two
areas of
identified
criteria.
15 points
Misses three or
more areas of
identified criteria.
13 points
20
Annotation
evaluates
value of each
article to
Assignment
objectives
Course
objectives
Evaluates the usefulness or value
of the article’s content by aligning
significant findings or results to
assignment and course
objectives, and nursing in
general.
25
points
Evaluates the
usefulness or value of
the articles content to
assignment and course
objectives, and nursing
in general.
2
2 points
Misses one or
two components
of evaluation.
19 points
Misses three or
more components
of evaluation.
17 points
25
Nursing in
general
Each
annotation:
Organization:
Concise
Logical
Each
annotation:
Evaluates each article in a
concise, logical flow of ideas, and
is without repetition.
10 points
Evaluates two articles
with a logical flow of
ideas and is without
repetition.
8 points
Evaluates a
single article
with errors in
flow of ideas.
7 points
Evaluates a single
article with errors
in flow of ideas
significantly
distracting from
content.
6 points
10
APA
Reference:
Components
Punctuation
Capitalization
Italics
Spacing
Each
reference:
Meets all format criteria.
5 points
Has one consistent
format error.
4 points
Has two
consistent
format errors.
3 points
Has more than
two format errors.
2 points
5
Grammar
and Spelling
Each
annotation:
Avoids awkward transitions,
overuse of conjunctions, spelling,
word-usage, or punctuation
errors.
5 points
Has less than two
grammar, word-usage,
spelling, or punctuation
errors.
4 points
Has three or
more grammar,
spelling, word-
usage, or
punctuation
errors.
3 points
Has grammar,
spelling, word-
usage, and
punctuation errors
that significantly
distract from
content.
2 points
5
Total Points 100
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
