Then Internet Archive.html
Tom Wujec’s 10 minute demonstration of the astrolabe illustrates an important point. Know “something,” like what time it is, even if that something is hugely useful, isn’t itself, education. Putting other things together that help us arrive and understand the “something” we have come to know is where real education, and innovation, happen. Libraries try to store all these things and education tries to use them productively.
Collecting all the information in the world for everyone to access is a tall order. But the Internet Archive says it can be done. It’s not Google and it’s not the NSA and it’s not Facebook. What makes it unique is that it’s a non-profit that has as its mission, “universal access to all knowledge.” It argues that every culture has made an effort to record, in one form or another, its own cultural artifacts. Some cultures pass down stories from memory. Some collect artifacts in libraries. Some establish formal institutions like religions and schools. But everyone wants to know where they came from. Since more and more of our culture is express in digital form, then a new way of archiving it has to be established. There is a terrible irony in all this and we’ll talk about it in future modules. But it seems that the easier it is to collect and store our cultural archives, the less people seem to want to do it. People can easily access and read an enormous amount of material, much more than ever before. But people read less and less.
The internet archive is partly about making it possible to access all this. But it’s also about storing it. In addition to archiving books, videos and images, it took on the task of archiving the entire internet and making it available through the
Wayback Machine. Try it. Pick a website such as cnn.com. Enter it into the Wayback Machine. Pick a date like 2001 and a date like September 11. It will return the webpage as it looked on that day, archived forever, or so the Internet Archive hopes.
This is a little like the re-discovery of the Library of Toledo only much, much, much bigger. Can you imagine the implications of, not just the collection of everything that’s been said, but the cataloging of it all in such a way that it’s easy to find, copy and use. Some of it is small potatoes. You can find my old resumes at daeuber.com. I can’t get rid of them and, if I had a more interesting past, I’d be worried. But the point is, nothing that’s said can ever be forgotten ever again. And that’s been the way we have always filtered our histories, sanitized our past and written our myths. What will the future look like if we can retrieve our past so easily?
Between the hamlets the Roman roads crumbled under the onslaught of
bracken and bush. With no movement from one place to another, there was
little point in maintaining them. The dwindling members of the population
subsisted on what they could grow in the forest clearings, or ‘assarts’, as they
were called, which poked like hesitant fingers into the shadows of the forest.
Only the well armed, or those protected by spiritual courage, ventured into the
woods.
Gradually, however, as the forest was pushed back, the small communities
grew, and by the eighth century some were loosely linked in the manorial
system. The manor was a totally autonomous entity, seldom covering more than
a few square miles, its illiterate serfs ruled by an equally illiterate lord, whose
duty it was to protect his manor in return for payment in kind. There was no
money. The manor had to be self-sufficient, as no help could be expected from
elsewhere. Life expectancy at the time was about forty years.
Several hundred such small manors might be held in sway by one overlord,
administering them as he saw fit. All transactions were conducted in terms of
land: ownership, tenure or rent. Each man paid his debts in acreage, produce or
service. Only the seasons changed. The routine of daily life was an unvaried
cycle of sleeping, eating, working and sleeping again. The mental horizons of
even the most inquisitive were limited by the forest wall. Customs, clothes,
dialect, food and laws, all were local. And there was no way of knowing if
things were any different elsewhere, for a small community might be fortunate
to see one visitor a year.
A pen drawing from
the margin of a
twelfth-century
psalter. Women are
shown shearing
sheep, spinning the
wool into thread, and
weaving it in
to
rough, broadweave
cloth on a medieval
vertical loom . The
threads are held in
position by a weight
at the bottom of the
frame.
In every monastery and cathedral in France Charlemagne established schools
whose task it was to teach the basics of literacy, for only in this way could he
ensure the continued existence
ofthe
knowledge ofthe past. To achieve his aim,
Charlemagne made use of Capella’s seven liberal arts, maintained over the
centuries in monastic libraries. From the middle of the eighth century onwards,
the liberal arts were taught all over Europe. The English scholar Alcuin was
brought over from York to head the Palace School at Aachen, Charlemagne’s
glittering capital. It was probably Alcuin who standardised writing through the
development of Carolingian minuscule, a tiny, clear script which was one day to
become the model for modern upper and lower case lettering..
The cathedral schools also taught psalms, the chant and how to compute the
seasons. After Alcuin’s death it was decreed that all parish priests should
provide this minimal education free. The main cathedral schools and centres of
intellectual activity were at Paris, Chartres, Laon and Reims, in northern
France. Later, on the Royal Portal of the cathedral at Chartres, sculptors would
place an allegory of the trivium and quadrivium, as the three-and four-subject
divisions of the curriculum became k;nown, to show to the illiterate wor
shippers the power and importance of the intellect in the service of God.
The Royal Portal of
Chartres Cathedral,
added to the building
by the Chancellor,
Thierry, one of a
group of new
thinkers who called
themselves ‘the
modern ones’. In
placing the figures of
the liberal arts so
close to the Virgin
and Child, Thierry
was proclaiming the
power of reason in
faith.
£ t o·HC lJlUl
ttlt ~tattrt9 .. ·~.
ctadttnntlo’tntnloW. ·
c f\hgtllut a:Jf·
rtautro.
Thus began the first cautious stirrings of commerce, as each hamlet with a The medieval
surplus went in search of buyers. Markets were set up in the lee of ruined economic recovery
Roman town walls, or at monastery gates. Merchants began to travel small was stimulated by
distances to barter goods. The discovery of silver at Rammelsberg, in Saxony, at
the horseshoe, an
the end of the tenth century put a tiny amount of coin into circulation. Small
import from the
towns, which we would now call villages, grew up around the market-places,
Middle East which
following the contours ofthe land. The houses were built in terraces for warmth
improved the
performance of the
and the streets were
curved to blunt the
effect of the wind.
animal over rough
But the philosophical
viewpoint at the time of
the resurgence
of the
cities in
ground and helped to
the tenth and eleventh
centuries left their
citizens ill-prepared for
the new
protect it from foot
problems now
demanding solution.
There was no concept of
progress. In the rot.
early Middle Ages men
were aware only ofthe
greatness that
had been
lost. ‘We
stand on the shoulders
of giants,’ theysaid. The
past held all that was
great and
glorious. It was the
source of all authority.
The purpose of any
intellectual
activity was not to
question this past world,
but to add respect for it.
The trivium provided skills only for administration. What little arithmetic
the quadrivium offered was clumsy. The use of roman numerals made
multiplication and division nearly impossible. In 1050 in Liege, people worked
out geometry problems by cutting pieces of parchment into triangles. On the
spot reckoning was done with what was called ‘finger maths’. For numbers
higher than 9000, said the Venerable Bede, echoing Capella, you needed the
skills of a dancer!
Word spread in Europe of the culture beyond the Pyrenees. The northern
part of Spain, round Barcelona and along the foothills of the northern
mountains, was Christian; it had never been fully settled by the invading
Arabs, who had arrived in Spain in 711, landing at Gibraltar. By 720 they had
taken Cordoba, Toledo, Medina, Zaragoza and all of southern Spain from the
Visigoths, barbarians-in-residence. The Arabs named their new territory Al
Andalus, the land of the Vandals, from which comes the modern name
Andalusia.
For two hundred years after the invasion Al-Andalus was a backwater of
Islam, far to the west of the centres of learning and commerce in Baghdad and
Damascus. Gradually, however, the land bloomed and became rich. By 932,
when the Umayyad Caliphate took power, with its capital in Cordoba, Spain
was the jewel in the crown of Islam.
Irrigation systems imported from Syria and Arabia turned the dry plains of
Andalusia into an agricultural cornucopia. Olives and wheat had always grown
there. The Arabs added pomegranates, oranges, lemons, aubergines, artichokes,
cumin, coriander, bananas, almonds, palms, henna, woad, madder, saffron,
sugar-cane, cotton, rice, figs, grapes, peaches, apricots, rice. The Muslim
peasants who worked the land were given shares in the property. The most
spectacular Arab innovations, however, were formal gardens like those of the
Generalife (from jannat-al-arif, the Inspector’s paradise) in the Alhambra,
Granada.
The astrolabe, with
which the Arabs
could tell the date
and hour from the
position of certain
stars. Movable
sights on the
instrument were
aligned with the star
and the relevant
numbers and signs
were read off from
windows (left) or at
the circumference
(right) .
Below: In a culture
which did not perm
it
realism in art,
Spanish Arab
patterned ceramic
work reached heights
of artistic expression
unequalled anywhere
in Europe.
Andalusia became rich and elegant. In the capital, Cordoba, where the
enlightened and intellectual Hakam, the second ruler of the new dynasty,
founded the great mosque, there were half a million inhabitants, living in
113,000 houses. There were 700 mosques and 300 public baths spread
throughout the city and its twenty-one suburbs. The streets were paved, and
lit. There were bookshops and more than seventy libraries. The boast of Arab
Spain was the great central library of Cordoba, built in the Alcazar, or Royal
Palace, around 970. The catalogue alone filled forty-four volumes, each fifty
pages long. There were over 400,000 titles in the library, more than in the whole
of France.
The Arabs used paper, a material still unknown in the West. Here, its
availability encouraged the development of a highly literate community with
regular postal services delivering correspondence as far away as India. They
also used paper money for their transactions. Most of the Caliphate revenue
came from export and import duties. By the ninth century the country was
producing wool and silk (in Almeria and Malaga), glass and brass (in Almeria),
pottery (in Paterna, near Valencia), gold and silver (in Jaen), iron and lead
(Cordoba), rubies. (Malaga) and swords (Toledo). There was a major tanning
industry in Cordoba, employing over 13,000 workers. Textiles were also
produced there, as were ceramics and crystal.
Without formal
marriage, the
passage of landed
property was
insecure. Here a
father transmits his
feudal rights through
his daughter to her
new husband, with
his wife’s approval.
From a manuscript
written at the order
of Alfonso II of
Aragon (1162-96).
Then, in 1140, the great Bolognese
jurist Gratian produced his
Decretum, a
lawyer’s textbook embodying all the
new techniques. The Decretum was
heavily influenced by Abelard’s Sic
et Non. It came in two parts. The
first gave
the main outlines of all law. The
second took hypothetical cases and
reconciled
the pros and cons using what is
essentiaily the modern technique of
cross
examination, incorporating
Aristotle’s rules of argument and
deduction. This
technique was particularly valuable
in dealing with conflicting
arguments
about the
law itself. In
such cases
Gratian
would also
apply the
rules
ofgrammar
to find the
true meaning
of the
terminology
being used.
By this time
law
had
become so
important
and so
attractive as
a career that
it
had been
split into
two types,
civil and
canon law.
John of
Salisbury
noted the
increasingly
common
problems
with which
the new,
codified law
dealt. In the
late 1150s a
major area
of difficulty
in canon law
was that
ofmarriage,
the key to
inheritance
and a
hazardous
venture, as
death by one
or other
party was
common. A
woman
might marry
several
times, each
time taking
with her a
complicated
dowry of
property that
had
originally
belonged to
one of her
husbands’
families.
The act of
marriage
itself was
extremely
informal.
More
often than
not it was
not even
conducted in
church.
What then
ofthe
legitimacy
of any heirs
born to the
union?
There is a
record of the
case of
Richard of
Anstey, who
went to his
Archbishop’s
court
eighteen
times and
twice more
to
the court of
the Pope
before his
affairs were
settled.
advance due to the Islamic vaulted arch and, later, the flying buttress, but it A detail from a
also gave people in the late Middle Ages the chance to express their new-found Chartres window
power. They did so by building giant cathedrals that thrust into the sky all over shows the work of two
Europe. of the guilds which
Between 1140 and 1220 they built cathedrals in Sens, Noyons, Senlis, Paris, contributed to the costs
Laon, Chartres, Reims, Amiens and Beauvais. The buildings were encyclopedias of the cathedral: top, a
in stone, ornamented with sculptures and windows that told stories from the cobbler; below, a
Bible. In both glass and stone a new naturalism in illustration appeared. While stonemason.
piece of parchment with a pinhole through it, Theodoric discovered what
caused the rainbow.
Shining sunlight through the pinhole on to the droplet of his container of
water and raising and lowering them, and measuring the effects he observed,
Theodoric saw that the colour of the rainbow spectrum depended on the angle
at which the light entered the droplet and on the position of the observer.
Calculating the rainbow mechanism thus, Theodoric was conducting the first
properly scientific experiment in Western European history and completing a
change in thinking that had begun with the fall of Toledo.
Where men had once said, ‘Credo ut intelligam’ (understanding can come only
through belief), they now said, ‘Intelligo ut credam’ (belief can come only
through understanding). In 1277, Roger Bacon was imprisoned for an indefinite
period for holding these opinions. Free and rational investigation of nature was
to come hard in the clash between reason and faith which would echo down to
our own time.
One of Theodoric of
Freiburg’ s sketches
showing how the
rainbow was formed,
which clearly
demonstrates his
understanding of
reflection and
refraction. The sun
shines, from the left,
on to the droplets,
and the eye perceives
the colours, in order,
at bottom centre.
chapter 2 of James Burke’s
The Day the Universe Changed, “In the Light of the Above”,
You can download the chapter here.
Watch Tom Wujec’s 10 minute demonstration of the astrolabe. Here is a link
This is the video introduces the idea of networks as a way of distributing information (about 55 minutes) :
http://ctcproxy.mnpals.net/login?url=https://fod.infobase.com/PortalPlaylists.aspx?wID=105843&xtid=206193
What does it mean to learn something? And has it changed over time? Some people say that technology changes the way we learn. Is this true? Just as importantly, does it change what we learn and why we learn? Burke outlines historic changes in learning and how these impacted the world in very big ways. Are the changes we see today, if any, just as big? Pay special attention to Wujec’s comments on what context is required to tell the time with the astrolabe. What about networks as a way of teaching? We will see this issue of Context come up over and over again in the course when it comes to how we perceive information.
All assignments are due at 11:59 in the morning.
Disruption – Video – Films On Demand (mnpals.net)
– here’s the 55mins video
Instructions on writing discussion post
How to write a good initial discussion post:
1. The purpose of writing a discussion post is to reflect on what you have learned from the assigned material. How does it support what you already thought? How does it challenge conventional wisdom? Where it conflicts with your understanding of the world, does it convince you? Where it agrees, what further understandings does it imply?
2. Your initial discussion post must include at least 300 words of your own material. Repeating the question, titles, quotations, paraphrases and other additions are not counted as your own material. Any discussion that does not meet the 300 word minimum will receive a grade of 0.
3. Refer to at least two of the assigned resources. You need to give some thought to what’s presented in the assigned material. For example, you might write: The Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy explains Locke’s understanding of the relationship between simple and complex ideas this way: “Once the mind has a store of simple ideas, it can combine them into complex ideas of a variety of kinds” (
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke/)
. Don’t make the class guess at the reference. We have to be able to find it. So it needs to be relevant and specific. People get busy and time is sometimes short, so it may be tempting at times to excerpt something from readings you haven’t considered carefully and stick it in your post to meet this requirement. Try not to do this. See point 5 on why. There is no need to use an MLA style citation to the end of a post. We need to read the quotation, and we need to know what in the material helped you arrive at the conclusions you arrived at and where we can find it. That means you need to include an author and a page number if it’s a printed resource, or a title reference for audio and video resources. Points will be deducted if the location of the reference isn’t obvious. To earn full points for your discussion, you need to refer to more than one of the assigned resources in the module if more are available. The resources work together.
4. Any discussion that includes sufficiently poor grammar or spelling to suggest that the posting was not proof-read and spell checked will receive a grade of 0.
5. The best way to meet the requirement to reference the readings is to quote them directly. But please do not quote lengthy sections of the readings. I am looking for your ideas concerning the readings and classes. See point 3. for a good example. Quotations are not considered part of the 300 word minimum.
6. Remember that you are reflecting on the material presented in the module and taking an informed position on the topic. It doesn’t help to simply repeat facts from the module. What do they mean? Use your existing opinion wisely. The distinction between research and opinion is an artificial distinction we don’t want to make in this class. Criticism is useful but only if it’s thoughtful and reasonable. If, at the end of every unit, you think exactly the same way you did when you started the unit, something has gone wrong.
8. You will need to post your own initial post before you can read the responses from others. It makes for a much more diverse conversation. After you have posted your initial post, I hope you will consider other ideas as well and comment on them. There is no grade-sensitive requirement to comment on other posts but, needless to say, your ideas on others’ thinking is the best way for all of us to learn. And feel free to respond to my comments on your post.