During the presentation of each project, the manager of A appears to be arrogant, and also mentions that the CEO of the company and he frequently play golf and have dinner after work. In considering each of the project’s presentations, you find that you are leaning much more closely to Project A, despite both projects being extremely similar with regard to timing and magnitude of cash flows.
Copyright Post University 2021, All Rights Reserved.
Due Date: 11:59 p.m. EST, Sunday of Unit 6
Points: 100
Overview:
One important topic that has been discussed this week has been managerial
overconfidence, and whether this can have a positive effect overall. For this week’s
assignment, assume that you have been appointed to a corporate committee that is
evaluating two mutually exclusive projects, Project A and Project B. Each project is
headed by a different manager. During the presentation of each project, the manager of
A appears to be arrogant, and also mentions that the CEO of the company and he
frequently play golf and have dinner after work. In considering each of the project’s
presentations, you find that you are leaning much more closely to Project A, despite
both projects being extremely similar with regard to timing and magnitude of cash flows.
Instructions:
For this week’s assignment write a 2-3 page account explaining what factors are at work
influencing your managerial decision-making skills, along with an evaluation of whether
these forces likely lead to better outcomes.
Requirements:
• 2-3 pages in length (double-spaced).
• Additional title and reference pages included.
• Proper grammar and APA formatting must be followed.
• See grading criteria on the following page.
Be sure to read the criteria by which your work will be evaluated before you write
and again after you write.
FIN402: Behavioral Finance in Personal Investment
Unit 6 Assignment: Managerial Decision-Making
Copyright Post University 2021, All Rights Reserved.
Evaluation Rubric for Managerial Decision-Making Assignment
CRITERIA Needs Improvement Satisfactory Proficient
(0-20 Points) (21-26 Points) (27-30 Points)
Clarity and
Structure
Assignment questions
are not addressed /
minimally addressed, or
incorrect; explanations
are hard to follow.
Assignment questions
are partially addressed;
some areas may be off-
topic.
Assignment questions are
addressed clearly and
thoroughly throughout.
Evidence of
Critical Thinking
Lacking critical thinking;
analysis contains
obvious responses to
questions; little thought
evident.
Some critical thinking
evident, but may not
directly address the key
concepts; analysis
shows partial
contextualizing of unit
material.
Clear evidence of critical
thinking; analysis addresses
key concepts and exhibits
originality and successful
contextualizing of the unit
material.
(0-13 Points) (14-17 Points) (18-20 Points)
Details and
Examples Used
None provided, or
minimal details explored
and/or examples used.
A few layers of detail and
examples used, though
some details may be
missing or lacking.
Writing explores multiple
layers of detail; provided
excellent explanations using
appropriate examples.
(0-6 Points) (7-8 Points) (9-10 Points)
Structure and
Flow
Flow is poor.
Paragraphing is
inappropriate.
Transitions are minimal
or absent. Redundancy
is evident.
Flow is good.
Paragraphing is mostly
appropriate. Transitions
are present, and
redundancies are
minimal.
Flow is excellent.
Paragraphing is clear, and
transitions are smooth and
consistent. Inappropriate
redundancies are absent.
Clear and
Professional
Writing and APA
Format
Errors impede
professional
presentation; no/minimal
APA guidelines
followed.
Few errors contained
that do not impede
professional
presentation.
Writing and format are clear,
professional, APA
compliant, and error free.
Copyright Post University 2021, All Rights Reserved.
Due Date: 11:59 p.m. EST, Sunday of Unit 6
Points: 100
Overview:
One important topic that has been discussed this week has been managerial
overconfidence, and whether this can have a positive effect overall. For this week’s
assignment, assume that you have been appointed to a corporate committee that is
evaluating two mutually exclusive projects, Project A and Project B. Each project is
headed by a different manager. During the presentation of each project, the manager of
A appears to be arrogant, and also mentions that the CEO of the company and he
frequently play golf and have dinner after work. In considering each of the project’s
presentations, you find that you are leaning much more closely to Project A, despite
both projects being extremely similar with regard to timing and magnitude of cash flows.
Instructions:
For this week’s assignment write a 2-3 page account explaining what factors are at work
influencing your managerial decision-making skills, along with an evaluation of whether
these forces likely lead to better outcomes.
Requirements:
• 2-3 pages in length (double-spaced).
• Additional title and reference pages included.
• Proper grammar and APA formatting must be followed.
• See grading criteria on the following page.
Be sure to read the criteria by which your work will be evaluated before you write
and again after you write.
FIN402: Behavioral Finance in Personal Investment
Unit 6 Assignment: Managerial Decision-Making
Copyright Post University 2021, All Rights Reserved.
Evaluation Rubric for Managerial Decision-Making Assignment
CRITERIA Needs Improvement Satisfactory Proficient
(0-20 Points) (21-26 Points) (27-30 Points)
Clarity and
Structure
Assignment questions
are not addressed /
minimally addressed, or
incorrect; explanations
are hard to follow.
Assignment questions
are partially addressed;
some areas may be off-
topic.
Assignment questions are
addressed clearly and
thoroughly throughout.
Evidence of
Critical Thinking
Lacking critical thinking;
analysis contains
obvious responses to
questions; little thought
evident.
Some critical thinking
evident, but may not
directly address the key
concepts; analysis
shows partial
contextualizing of unit
material.
Clear evidence of critical
thinking; analysis addresses
key concepts and exhibits
originality and successful
contextualizing of the unit
material.
(0-13 Points) (14-17 Points) (18-20 Points)
Details and
Examples Used
None provided, or
minimal details explored
and/or examples used.
A few layers of detail and
examples used, though
some details may be
missing or lacking.
Writing explores multiple
layers of detail; provided
excellent explanations using
appropriate examples.
(0-6 Points) (7-8 Points) (9-10 Points)
Structure and
Flow
Flow is poor.
Paragraphing is
inappropriate.
Transitions are minimal
or absent. Redundancy
is evident.
Flow is good.
Paragraphing is mostly
appropriate. Transitions
are present, and
redundancies are
minimal.
Flow is excellent.
Paragraphing is clear, and
transitions are smooth and
consistent. Inappropriate
redundancies are absent.
Clear and
Professional
Writing and APA
Format
Errors impede
professional
presentation; no/minimal
APA guidelines
followed.
Few errors contained
that do not impede
professional
presentation.
Writing and format are clear,
professional, APA
compliant, and error free.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
