ap english

follow files below 

simple assignment 

Embedding Evidence Scavenger Hunt

Directions: Use the

Sample Conformity Essays

and

Sample Penmanship Essays

to find sentences that match the prompts below. Fill in ALL the boxes and cite the essay the quote comes from (cite as: Sample Conformity Essay #2 or Sample Penmanship Essay #3, etc). No late work will be accepted and Ms. F. will post the answer key tomorrow.

Sample Conformity Essays

Sample Penmanship Essays

Find sources

here

and commentary

here
.

Prompt: Read the sources

here
. Then choose an issue related to the tension in schools between individuality and conformity. You might choose an issue such as dress codes, mandatory classes, or the structure of the school day. You do not have to choose an issue that you have experienced personally.
Then, write an essay in which you use this issue to argue the extent to which schools should support individuality or conformity. Synthesize at least three of the sources for support.

Sample Essay #1:

I am now a junior at my highschool. In order to graduate this particular high school, I must take a required course of ‘professional and technical studies.’ This doesn’t sounds at all bad or make it seem like I am being suppressed to conformity, but it actually is. My interests and goal as a major is to be in the communications area. I requested to take journalism as one of my classes to have experience in that field of study. It was to my dismay that I was no longer able to take that class for my senior year because of a required class I had to take. If schools traditionally have 2 goals (1) to help each student gain personal fulfillment and (2) to help create good citizens, why are they forcing upon classes that you don’t want to take? Why am I not able to take journalism when it is fulfilling my personal goals?

In source A, John Taylor Gatto makes the case that schools aren’t necessarily needed for education; he says, “and plenty of people throughout the world today find a way to educate themselves without resorting to a system of compulsory secondary schools that all too often resemble prisons.” He makes a very true point. Most kids today are living in a world where technology makes learning easy access. I believe I would’ve done very well at learning microsoft tutorials online rathering than having to find ways to it without having to go to school and be imprisoned for almost 8 hours everyday.

We supposedly live in a democratic nation but it is so often that tyranny and communism is being practiced, especially in schools. The structure of the school day and the classes you must attend are all forced unto students. It is like a routine they must follow, or their futures will be “destroyed.” Source B shows a daily bell schedule of a public high school. Each passing time is 4 minutes long and the schedule doesn’t even point out lunch. School schedules are so strict and confined, nothing must be out of place. If a student is a minute late they receive even more of a confinement – detention.

Schools should be there to support individuality and only conformity to a certain point. They are trying to standardize all kids to be the same in order to “fit into society.” They must all take the required courses, the standardized tears, and sometimes even wear the same attire. Source C shows a cover design for a kindergarten class in preparing for standardized tests. Even at such a young age, are the schools trying to conform the minds from evolving into individuals. Conformity does not always mean it’ll ensure socialization among students. Schools should help to ensure or aid socialization but they should not go as deep as forcing them/students to be all alike. In source D, Neil Postman said, “But the idea of a school is that individuals must learn in a setting which individual needs are subordinated to group interests.” In a way, schools should teach students to get along and cooperate, but they don’t need to go to an extreme as to suppress the individual’s mind to conform to society. Isn’t that what communism is?

School are there to teach students the ways to survive in a society and get along. The schools these days are getting stricter and stricter. School hours are increasing, and students such as I, are being confined longer and longer. School should be a place where students want to go to be educated and develop their own thoughts. Not a place we feel we have to go in order to fit in. The feeling of being watched, controlled, and conformed isn’t a feeling of nationalism or a feeling we’d want to have when asked why we defend our country. Source G shows the list of expectations a public school has for their students. All the “expectations” are more like laws a citizen must abide to in a society. “Respect the teacher’s position as leader in the classroom” sounds like a statement of a tyrant. These “expectations” seem forced upon with no freedom. If schools want students to be successful citizens, they should allow students to take the courses they want, let them breathe.

As a student, I understand the school wanting to educate us on Microsoft Word or Home economic, however, forcing these courses on us and then threatening us that we won’t be able to graduate if we don’t seems too controlling and unreasonable. Schools should support conformity to a certain level that will push us off into society where from then, our individualism determines our fate. They shouldn’t suppress our natural character to what they think is acceptable to become a good citizen. After all, aren’t the famous historical figures the ones who spoke out of conformity and embraced their individualistic thoughts? Like Martin Luther King, society and schools taught everyone to be quiet about race, but he didn’t, and now look at the impact he has left on the world. Individualism is good, and student should embrace it. Schools should recognize the individual ability everyone has, without questioning it, or putting their own twist on it.

Sample Essay #2

Can a mind learn under bounds? With such strict rules in schools today, children are facing bounds that strip them of their individuality. So which is more important; conformity or individuality? To succeed one needs freedom; they need to be able to exercise and stretch their reach. Rules that constrict them in to tight spots are killing children’s want to learn: uniforms, tight schedules, mandatory classes, dress codes are all taking the children’s right to learn freely away. Individuality is more important than conformity and this individuality needs to be recognized more by school.

Conformity does have its benefits. As can be seen in the photo of the young boys singing, conformity is nice on the eyes (Source F). Everyone likes neat and nice, and that is what conformity creates. A pretty eye-pleasing picture where everyone is safe. A schedule where “1st bell 8:16am” and the beginning of “Period 2” starts at “9:10” ensures order and that children will get equal amounts of education (Source B). This is good for some kids, they cannot get lost or stray off the path. At the same time kids are not being taught how to think for themselves., Instead they are simply showing up when expected and going through the motions as they were told to. They are told to “accept responsibility for their learning” and “cooperate with the specific rules of the school” all without thinking (Source G). Placed into groups and just being told to do, their individuality is being stripped away.

Children are not even allowed to choose their own clothes; they cannot express themselves through their dress no longer. Instead they are told to “dress in appropriate attire which does not distract or offend others” and dress like everyone else (Source G). They are being denied the freedom to show their own style and thoughts, that is exactly what the dress code is doing. By striving to reach conformity they are killing individuality. From even kindergarten children are being molded. As seen in the book cover, kindergarteners are taking standardized tests (Source C). They are being looked at as part of a whole, seeing where they stand in the big picture. They are told to brush their hair a certain way or a specific color according to their gender. They are not being allowed to explore learn which is the best possible way for a child to gain knowledge. Instead they are in “a setting in which individual needs are subordinated to group interests” (Source D). They are expected to learn as a group, they are looked down upon if not good enough and not given proper recognition if they can think abstractly or do stuff differently. Conformity is hindering the limits to what a child can learn.

If given freedom, a child can learn an infinite amount of things, but school is taking this freedom away. Tight schedules lock students in; mandatory classes kill motive to learn; boredom endured strips the curiosity; school is teaching them to learn as a group though “groups do not learn; individuals do” (Source D). When a mind can expand its horizons wonderful things come out of it. Inventions never dreamed of come about because one thought out of the box. Some of our most revered people in history such as “George Washington, Benjamin Franklin… were not products of a school system.” Instead they were given the freedom to roam and explore, to let their mind wander and come upon its own conclusion. School is not allowing this; they call for certain subjects to be thought of at certain times. They want everyone to look the same; they do not allow the expression of style through clothes. School is harming individuality, which brings wonders with their conformity.

When bounded, how can one move or do anything? They cannot! This is what schools are doing, they are binding childrens minds, they are not allowing them to think by their own. They need to let the children go, let them free. No more dress codes or mandatory classes. Allow them to sudy what they want as they so choose.Allow them to dress as they prefer. Free them to think to their full limits.

Sample Essay #3:

There has been much disagreement over the years about the way students are being taught in school. Many people believe that schools should target individuality while others believe that conformity is the way to go. Personally, I believe that schools should focus more on a students individual interests as opposed to having all students engage in one area of study. A big part of this issue has to do with required classes and the testing that accompanies them. There are many sources that show why these are useless and often harmful to students.

Forcing students to take classes that do not interest them is a waste of time for everyone. Students and teachers alike. The same goes for required testing. Forcing students to do these things makes school seem like a prison (Source E, Source A). Take Source F for example. The picture shows students singing in music class. Now that class would be much more enjoyable if the students in it wanted to learn as opposed to being forced to learn. I personally believe that students’ individual needs should be catered to by letting them select classes that suit their fancy. Required testing goes along with required classes in my opinion, its not needed. Making a student take a difficult test on a subject that doesn’t interest them is ridiculous. Of course they’re going to perform poorly, because they dont care. Now I dont think its fair that a student gets held back or punished for that. I think standardized tests should be banned completely (including in kindergarten which is clearly shown in Source C), but if they must remain a part of the schooling system, then they should at least be banned on classes that let students explore their individual interests. That way students java a greater chance of a better outcome.

Overall, I believe that schools should focus more on the individual needs of students and less on having them conform to one main idea of way of learning. Sources show that students are happier when school is catered more to their interests, and I personally believe that this, as opposed to conformity makes students happier and will make them better members of society in the future.

Sample Synthesis Essays

Find prompt and sources

here

.

Sample Essay #1:

Penmanship is a practice that has held true throughout centuries of world history. Throughout its beginnings as pictographic scripts and its historical practical applications, penmanship has managed to connect people for as long as time can tell. Through letters via lovers via carrier pigeon or through signatures on legal documents, penmanship finds its place in society day in and day out. While to some, cursive handwriting in particular may seem a futile use of motor skills, for many, the track of a pen soaring loops across a paper allows them not only several cognitive benefits, but a sense of individuality and normalcy in a rapidly digitalizing world. Cursive handwriting, though it may seem outdated in the digital age, is vital in society not only because it promotes cognitive development, but because it can be used to define a person and his/her work; due to the importance of cursive writing, its teaching must not be omitted from schooling.

In practice, the benefits of cursive writing cannot be outshone, especially in terms of cognitive development. Studies show that the act of handwriting not only develops the regions of the brain associated with thinking, short term memory, and language, but that it also helps with information retention (Kysilko). While the cognitive benefits of handwriting are obviously not limited to cursive handwriting, manuscript, while it yields the same benefits, is slower. Many proponents of eliminating the teaching of cursive in schools argue that it would allow time for other more important skills to be developed, cursive helps save time in the long term for many due to its fluidity in practice. Others claim that cursive should not be taught as a necessity but as an art, but this perspective, too, fails to acknowledge that it contradicts the primary doctrine of the anti-cursive: that the teaching of the skills is a waste of time (Pot). The historical significance of cursive is also important to note when discussing the viability of teaching cursive in school in the modern day. In American history, cursive was taught as a method of cultivating an American identity, as Dickie Drake, Alabama state representative, stated, “cursive writing identifies you as much as your physical features do.” (Trubek). In order to maintain the sense of individuality Americans hold to dearly, handwriting must continue to be taught. Perhaps handwriting seems a superficial means of maintaining individuality, but in a rapidly digitalizing world, sometimes the only way to distinguish the writing of two people is by handwriting. Unless you are a seasoned stylographer, two 12pts Times New Romans fonts written by anonymous authors will be impossible to distinguish. No matter how you look at it, cursive handwriting is a vital component of human development and must continue to be taught in schools.

Perhaps the most common rebuttal to the importance of teaching cursive handwriting in school is that traditional writing methods are becoming obsolete, but studies show that this is clearly not the case. As schools opt to print fewer copies of worksheets in favor of digital annotation and many textbooks are releasing digital forms, a widespread falsehood is gaining popularity: the idea that schools are “[writing] off the traditional route of writing” (Gillis). In casual observation of more affluent areas, this may seem obvious, but studies show that a greater amount of time in many elementary classrooms is spent hand-writing than is spent using technology (graph). This simple disproval eliminates the top argument against the continuation of teaching cursive handwriting, thus deeming anti-cursive sentiment unarguable.

The teaching of cursive in schools offers copious amounts of benefit for students that cannot effectively be replaced by any other methods. Cursive is ingrained in the minds of people everywhere, perhaps due to its lasting effect on human cognitive development. So I implore you, student or not, to continue to study cursive. Allow yourself a return to tradition after a long day at the computer. You might just have a mark on your mind forever.

Sample #2:

In the present, handwriting instruction in schools has dwindled from its former prominence. The digital age offers alternatives to developing and mastering penmanship, so the art is less prioritized compared to alternative common core subjects. Although handwriting instruction develops motor skills, it has little place in schools because it is inefficient compared to technology, and other subjects are more important in the real world.

Many advocates for handwriting instruction cite motor skill development as a reason to keep the practice. For instance, the National Association of State Boards of Education claims practicing handwriting both requires and augments fine motor skills (Source D). However, attributing motor skills primarily to this cause is not entirely accurate. Justin Pot rebutted the claim by explaining other uses of hands such as playing video games are equally as effective (Source E). While handwriting instruction may indeed promote superior motor skills, alternative options render taking periods of class for this one section, irrelevant. Therefore, the development of fine motor skills is not exclusive to handwriting instruction, so schools should instead consider less time-obtrusive alternatives.

One flaw of handwriting instruction is its decreasing efficiency with the advent of digital typing. Author Anne Trubek of the New York Times admits even third graders spend less time typing than writing (Trubek). Because note-taking skills are maximized with the author’s speed, if one method is notoriously slower than others, the most efficient option should be practiced. In fact, a survey of elementary school students quantified the difference in speed as handwriting takes over twice as much time as computer use (Source F). Due to this extreme discrepancy, practicing handwriting instruction in schools should not be encouraged when technology is generally far superior for the students whose skills must be cultivated. As such, handwriting instruction has little place in the modern era.

Finally, other subjects should take the place of time spent instructing handwriting in schools. Specifically in regards to specialized handwriting like cursive, limited school time is better spent on subjects the students will use daily, and even second-grade teacher Deb Fitzgerald agreed schools should “‘move on’ and focus class time on other topics” (Source A). Skills such as math should be prioritized for younger children since methods like multiplication are integral to both adult and child life (Source E). Overall, rather than devote time to a subject with little use, schools should instead reallocate time to other case topics the student can use in the real world.

In conclusion, while handwriting instruction has some amount of merit with its promotion of motor skills, it poses little worth in schools because of its inefficiency and lack of physical use.

Sample #3:

Cursive handwriting should not be focused, or taught in school, because it is a waste of time, it is not useful, and technology is more prevalent now.

Teaching cursive writing is a waste of time. If cursive writing is not mandatory, then that can lead students to focus on building a larger vocabulary, which will ultimately make them a stronger writer. In Source C, the text states in the last paragraph “the changes imposed by the digital age may be good for writers and writing, because they achieve automatically quicker on the keyboard, today’s third graders may well become better writers as handwriting takes up less of their education.” This piece of text displays how younger children have a better chance at being better writers as handwriting is not taking much of their time. With this extra time the children could be building vocabulary to be a successful writer. Learning cursive writing in school is a waste of time because as the future is approaching the use of cursive is becoming non-existent. Source A states that “the experiences most of us have, with 30 minutes of practicing cursive in class, have gone by the wayside.” This is supporting the fact that the time used learning cursive has not been useful in everyday life.

Going along with a waste of time cursive isn’t used enough to be beneficial, so why learn it. Many schools have cut it out of the curriculum. Source A states that “41 states have adopted the Common Core State Standards for English, which omits cursive handwriting from required curriculum.” Source A clearly displays the ideal that cursive handwriting in the school system isn’t mandatory, because it is stated that 41 states have taken it out of their curriculum.

As time goes on and technology progresses technology will be used more and the use of pencil and paper are going to be more discrete. In addition to that with technology advancing there are going to need to be skills taught about technology. Source A states “The move outside our schools, and in innovative schools, is toward technology.” This from Source A is simply supporting that technology is taking over, because the world after school is filled with technology. From Source C it states “the world is changing, quickly. And while it is hard to make predictions about where technology is headed, it’s safe to say the future won’t involve a lot of cursive handwriting.” With that in mind, it is obvious to see with technology advancing the need for cursive handwriting is decreasing.

To conclude, cursive handwriting shouldn’t be a skill enforced in school.

Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:

Turnitin Report

Formatting

Title Page

Citation

Outline

Place an Order