apa

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

Once you have a clear understanding of what your organization needs, it is time to consider the interview process. This assignment is a continuation of the acquiring, developing, and leveraging employee process you have already been working on during this course. The interview process is an important step in hiring qualified diverse individuals for your organization.

For this assignment, develop an interview strategy you would consider using to interview and select a diverse pool of qualified candidates for your organization. You are required to use the job description you developed in the previous assignment. As you are developing your interview strategy, think about preassessment options that would benefit the interview process. The following must be included in your interview strategy (750-1,000 words):

· A detailed description of the time, place, format, interview type, and employees involved in the actual interview process.

· At least one preassessment tool to be included in the selection process. Explain why this testing option is best suited for selecting a diverse array of employees.

· A minimum of four situational and four behavioral interview questions you would use to interview for the job. (Reminder: Use the job description from your previous assignment.)

Cite and reference a minimum of three scholarly sources with at least one from the 
Wall Street Journal to support the ideas presented.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. 

Selection Process – Rubric

Detailed Description of Interview Process 27.5 points

Criteria Description

Paper includes description for the interview process that addresses the requirements

for the entire interview process, incorporating research based on observations

conducted.

5. Target 27.5 points

A thorough description for the interview process is included. The description

accurately addresses the requirements for the entire interview process,

incorporating research

based on observations conducted.

4. Acceptable 23.93 points

A detailed description for the interview process is included. The description

addresses the requirements according to the assignment with detail and research

based on observations conducted.

3. Approaching 21.73 points

A detailed description for the interview process is included. The description

minimally addresses the requirements according to the assignment.

2. Insufficient 20.35 points

A detailed description for the interview process is included but is incomplete or

lacks details.

Testing Options 22 points

Criteria Description

Paper includes multiple testing options with justification for using them during the

interview process.

5. Target 22 points

Multiple testing options are included with a detailed justification for using them

during the interview process. There is a detailed explanation for selecting the

testing options for the interview process based on observations conducted in the

organization.

Collapse All

4. Acceptable 19.14 points

Multiple testing options are included in the interview process. There is a detailed

explanation for selecting the testing options for the interview process.

3. Approaching 17.38 points

One testing option is included in the interview process. There is a minimal

explanation for selecting the testing option for the interview process.

2. Insufficient 16.28 points

Testing options are included, but

are incomplete or lack details.

Interview Questions 27.5 points

Criteria Description

Paper includes interview process covering four behavioral and four situational

questions.

5. Target 27.5 points

The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions. The

questions are well developed and there is a clear connection to the job descriptions

developed in previous assignments.

4. Acceptable 23.93 points

The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions. The

questions relate to the job descriptions developed in previous assignments.

3. Approaching 21.73 points

The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions.

2. Insufficient 20.35 points

The interview process includes both behavioral and situational questions, but they

are incomplete or lack details.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Thesis, Position, or Purpose 7.7 points

Criteria Description

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target 7.7 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully

directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable 6.7 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly

directed to a specific audience.

3. Approaching 6.08 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the

appropriate audience is demonstrated.

2. Insufficient 5.7 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally

weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion 8.8 points

Criteria Description

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves

from development.

5. Target 8.8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout.

The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous

conclusion aligns to the

development of the purpose.

4. Acceptable 7.66 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression

of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the

development of the purpose.

3. Approaching 6.95 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on

each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

2. Insufficient 6.51 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are

inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic

and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

Evidence 5.5 points

Criteria Description

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers

other perspectives.

5. Target 5.5 points

Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives

are integrated effectively.

4. Acceptable 4.79 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.

3. Approaching 4.35 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

2. Insufficient 4.07 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or

integration of other perspectives is present.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Mechanics of Writing 5.5 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 5.5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 4.79 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 4.35 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 4.07 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

Format/Documentation 5.5 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 5.5 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of

direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

4. Acceptable 4.79 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor

errors.

3. Approaching 4.35 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 4.07 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Total 110 points