The proliferation of the internet has democratized information dissemination, allowing virtually anyone to publish web pages. Unlike resources found in the Library’s subscription databases, which typically undergo a rigorous review process for inclusion, many websites lack such vetting. As a result, it becomes imperative for users to exercise discernment when evaluating internet resources, ensuring they offer balanced, factual information.
While reliable internet resources encompass a wide array of materials, including peer-reviewed journal articles, government reports, conference papers, industry standards, and news reports, it’s crucial to recognize that the mere presentation of a website does not guarantee the accuracy of its content. To discern the reliability of internet sources, users are encouraged to consider several key criteria:
- Authorship: Identifying the author of an internet resource is paramount. Assessing the author’s credentials, education, work history, affiliations, and previous publications can provide insights into their expertise and credibility.
- Timeliness: Determining the date of the last update or publication of an internet resource is essential for assessing its currency and relevance to the topic at hand.
- Citations: Evaluating whether the internet resource cites the work of others indicates the thoroughness and integrity of its content.
- Balance and Scholarliness: Assessing the balance and scholarly rigor of the resource’s content helps discern whether it presents a well-rounded and evidence-based perspective or exhibits biases.
- Publisher: Investigating the publisher of the internet resource—whether it’s a business, university, government organization, or professional association—can provide insights into its reliability and credibility.
- Intended Audience: Understanding the intended audience of the internet resource helps determine its suitability for university-level research or whether it caters to secondary education or a more general audience.
- Domain: Examining the domain of the internet resource—whether it ends in .org, .gov, .edu, .com, or .net—can offer clues to its scholarly nature, with .org, .gov, and .edu domains generally indicating more reliable sources.
For further guidance in evaluating internet resources, users can explore additional resources such as the Check, Please! Starter Course—a free online course offering lessons in fact-checking and sourcing. Additionally, the SIFT (The Four Moves) framework provides steps for critically evaluating unfamiliar claims or sources, while the Website Evaluation Worksheet developed by Purdue University Libraries offers a structured approach to assessing website reliability.
By leveraging these resources and employing critical evaluation techniques, users can navigate the vast expanse of internet information with confidence, ensuring they access accurate, trustworthy sources for their research and information needs.
Additional Resources:
- Check, Please! Starter Course: This free online course provides users with comprehensive instruction on fact-checking and source evaluation, delivered through five accessible lessons.
- SIFT (The Four Moves): Designed to equip students with effective strategies for navigating unfamiliar claims or sources, SIFT offers a systematic approach comprising four key steps.
- Website Evaluation Worksheet: Developed by Purdue University Libraries, this worksheet offers a structured framework for evaluating the reliability and credibility of websites, aiding users in discerning trustworthy sources from unreliable ones.
Limit by Domain
To locate the “site or domain” box, access Google’s Advanced Search options and input the desired domain you wish to search within, as demonstrated below.
Another method is to append site:.edu (or .org, .gov, etc) to the end of your search terms directly in any Google search box. For instance, to locate articles concerning “ethical leadership” published on government websites, simply input the terms “ethical leadership” followed by site:.gov, as illustrated below.