Complete Draft of the Literature Review Section

Assignment Content

In class, we learned how to write the introduction and conclusion of the Literature Review section, which includes:
Introduction (6 sentences on p. 10a)
Review of Literature (using notes on p. 13a – ONE objective summary is graded already — apply feedback)
Analysis of Literature (compare and contrast activity on p. 16a)
For this submission: You will submit your full draft of the Literature Review in a WORD document.
YOU MUST CHECK YOUR SIMILARITY prior to submission here.
Grading:
Title Page = 10 pts
Literature Review: Intro, Review of Literature, and Analysis of Literature WITH in-text citations and correct level headings:
Introduction = 15 pts
Review of Literature = 40 pts
Analysis of Literature = 20 pts
References page with ALL three research articles listed = 15 pts

Save Time On Research and Writing

Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.

Get My Paper

Final ‘Mission’ Packet

[Your Name]

Department of [Your Major], King Graduate School

KG 60

: Graduate Research & Critical Analysis

Professor Ramlochan

April

Required Task

Week Skill is Practiced

Workbook Activity

Page Number

APA-7-Compliant Title Page

Week 3

Level 1 Header:
Title of Your Paper

· Introduction paragraph with a thesis statement

Week 12

Activity: 1st Sentence of the Opening Paragraph

Activity: Drafting Your Thesis Statement

Level 1 Header:
Literature Review

· Opening paragraph ensuring credibility of sources evaluated in the Review of Literature

Week 7

Activity: Developing Introductory Paragraph to Literature Review

10a

· Review of Literature including only research articles

Week 6

Activity: Notes for Research Articles, Notice My Capitalization

13a

· Analysis of Literature including compare and contrast of methodologies, findings, and recommendations

Week 8

Activity: Analyze Your Research Articles: Compare and Contrast

16a

Activity: Checklist for the Literature Review

17a

Level 1 Header:
Discussion: Mitigation Recommendation

17b

· Opening paragraph summarizing the populations/locations affected by this problem

Week 10

Activity: Reintroduce and Summarize the Problem and Populations Affected

17b

· Summary of existing mitigation techniques

Week 9

Activity: Find a Company/Organization/Policy Working to Mitigate the Problem

17c

· Recommendation, connecting existing mitigation techniques to the specific location/population of the problem

Week 10

Activity: Develop Your Recommendation with Evidence

18a

Level 1 Header:
Conclusion

· Conclusion paragraph

Week 12

Activity: Checklist to the Conclusion Paragraph:

22a

New Page – Level 1 Header:
References

APA-7-Compliant References Page including every source cited in-text

Week 3

Instructions to Packet Use

Activities must be completed according to the weekly order on p.

The process and order of conducting secondary applied research taught in KG 604 will provide you with a strong framework of research, which you will continue to build upon and adjust throughout your program. Do not complete Actives in any other order than the weekly order on p.2.

You will then use all Activities, in the order listed on p. 2, to guide you during the writing process.

Page #

Paper Title (bold with title capitalization)

Racial Disparities in Healthcare Among Pregnant Women in the United States

(NOTICE one blank, double-spaced line)

Katniss Everdeen

Department of Public Health, King Graduate School

Due Date

Your Name

Department & Name of College

Course Number & Name

KG 604: Research & Critical Analysis

Instructor’s Name

(first name optional)

Dr. John H. Watson

July 1, 2021

Introductory Paragraph

Outline for Introductory Paragraph

·
Opening Sentence: Grab the reader’s attention.

·
Transition Sentence(s): Each sentence should naturally flow from the opening sentence into the thesis statement.

·
Thesis Statement: One sentence to summarize what is addressed in the paper with your recommendation: It is your whole paper “squished” into one sentence!

Transition Sentences

Opening Sentence

Thesis Statement

Color Coding:

Green = Opening sentence meant to grab reader’s attention

= Sentences in between that are needed to transition from Green to Purple

Purple = Thesis statement

Student Sample: Introduction

Introduction

African American, American Indian, and Alaska Native women are up to three times

more likely to die from adverse pregnancy-related outcomes, a disparity that increases with

age (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2019).

Researchers found a program which provided support to African American women through group trainings entailing stress reduction techniques, life skills development, and the building of social support. This enabled mitigation efforts to be focused and geared around the factors that influence and contributed to adverse pregnancy outcomes among the minority women within the community, thus reducing and preventing negative pregnanchy outcomes in women of color. In the United States, maternal mortality and adverse health outcomes persist within the minority community, and as a result, racial disparities in healthcare among pregnant women is a current preventable public health concern, therefore it is vital to understand the determinants of health that influences negative pregnancy related outcomes in minority women, similar to one of California’s intervention programs, the Black Infant Health Program (Nichols & Cohen, 2019).

Opening Sentence

Activity: 1st Sentence of the Opening Paragraph

Purpose: To Grab the Reader’s Attention

This ONE Sentence Must include:

1. a surprising, disturbing, little-known, or wonderful fact

2. a statistic

3. an in-text citation

Examples: Find and Number All Three of These Elements Below

Student Samples: Opening Sentence

Sample 1

African American, American Indian, and Alaska Native women are up to three times

more likely to die from adverse pregnancy-related outcomes, a disparity that increases with
age (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2019).

Sample 2

Studies estimate that approximately 40 million Americans, or about 20 percent of the population, are attempting to restrict their intake of food high in carbohydrates (Sanders and Katz, 2004; Hirsch, 2004).

Write your own here, and number the 3 parts!

1st sample adapted from student paper, Tamifer Lewis;

2nd sample adapted from on-line textbook, retrieved from http://saylor.org/books.455

Thesis Statement

Your thesis statement is the driving force of your paper based on research. It should feel like it is your entire paper in one sentence: the problem, the research, recommendation based on research.

General Formula

Problem + research + recommendation based on the research (citation) = your thesis statement

***Important***

Certain things can change in the general formula based on what your professor asks. This is why it is so important to read directions very carefully.

KG 604: Steps to the Thesis

1. Restate the Problem with citation

2. Isolate and name the company/organization/program/policy and state why it works, with citation

3. Connect #2 to your population or location and write your
recommendation

Student Sample Thesis Statement

Research examples to illustrate the points above.

In the United States, maternal mortality and adverse health outcomes persist within the minority community, yet as racial disparities in healthcare among pregnant women is a current preventable public health concern, it is vital to understand the determinants of health that influences negative pregnancy related outcomes in minority women, similar to one of California’s intervention programs, the Black Infant Health Program (Nichols and Cohen, 2019).

Activity: Drafting Your Thesis Statement

Answer the following questions in the orange column below and place a check mark next to each task.

Steps

Description of Steps

Draft Your Notes to Build Your Thesis Statement

Check

· Restate the Problem with citation:

· Isolate and name the company/organization/ program/policy and state why it works, with citation:

· Connect #2 to your population or location and write your recommendation

Steps

Ensure the Following:

Check

·
My thesis statement is the Last Sentence of the Opening Paragraph

·
My recommendation is based ONLY on the Research, with no

·
My thesis statement contains in-text citations

Now, use your work above to write your statement in the blank space below!

Literature Review

Definition (part of the overall research paper you will write for this course)

literature review
is an objective summary of what the scientific literature says about

your specific topic or question. In this kind of paper, you demonstrate your familiarity with pertinent work in the field. The literature review gives the research history, upon which later research can be built.

The Literature Review is Not a Research Paper

Research Paper (what you may be writing in other courses;
includes a literature review) The goal of a

research paper
is to draw on what others have to say about a topic and

engage the sources in order to thoughtfully offer a unique perspective on the issue at hand.

Typically includes these sections (may vary per your professor’s assignment):

1. Introduction

2. Review of Literature

3. Analysis of Literature

Adapted from:

https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/types_of_ap

a_papers.html

and

https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/research_papers/genre_and_th

e_research_paper.html

Three Parts of the Literature Review

Introduction Paragraph for the Literature Review: 6 Steps

Six Steps to a Successful Introduction

Steps

Description of Steps

Sample

Opening sentence: isolate your research problem, with citation

“Research suggests that racial disparities in healthcare among pregnant women persists in the United States (Zhang et al. 2013).”

Explain why it is necessary to solve this problem

“Due to this continuous occurrence, it is vital to examine the factors that contribute to the adverse outcomes in maternal health.”

Ensure your reader that you have only included research articles in the literature review and identify the main theme among them

“The literature review

contained only research articles about factors that impacted and influenced disparities in

pregnancy outcomes.”

If you notice multiple factors, you should list them

“Factors that were reviewed were socioeconomic status, public health insurance, race/ethnicity, and poverty status.”

Include the names of the databases you used to conduct your research from the Monroe College Library

“The literature review was conducted using EBSCO
Host and ProQuest databases from the Monroe College Library.”

Lastly, list any search words/terms you used in order to find your research articles

“The search terms used to

compile pertinent articles were racial disparities maternal health, adverse pregnancy outcomes,

and maternal health outcomes

.”

Student Sample: Introduction to Literature Review

Literature Review

Research suggests that racial disparities in healthcare among pregnant women persists in

the United States (Zhang et al. 2013). Due to this continuous occurrence, it is vital to examine

the factors that contribute to the adverse outcomes in maternal health. The literature review

contained only research articles about factors that impacted and influenced disparities in

pregnancy outcomes. Factors that were reviewed were socioeconomic status, public health

insurance, race/ethnicity, and poverty status. The literature review was conducted using EBSCO

Host and ProQuest databases from the Monroe College Library. The search terms used to

compile pertinent articles were racial disparities maternal health, adverse pregnancy outcomes,
and maternal health outcomes

Activity: Developing Introductory Paragraph to Literature Review

10a

Directions

Fill in the orange column to build out your introductory paragraph.

Steps

Description of Steps

Your Sentences

Check

Opening sentence: isolate your research problem, with citation

Explain why it is necessary to solve this problem

Ensure your reader that you have only included research articles in the literature review and identify the main theme among them

If you notice multiple factors, you should list them

Include the names of the databases you used to conduct your research from the Monroe College Library

Lastly, list any search words/terms you used in order to find your research articles

3.
Review of Literature

This part consists of the objective summaries of your research articles. The order in which you present these is important. You will need to create Level 2-3 headings to cluster similar research articles by theme or purpose. (Typically, each level heading should include at least three research articles, amounting to 5-10 research articles,
but as this is a foundations course, you will only provide a total of three to four (3-4) research articles for your Literature Review.)

For each research article found on your topic, you must write a strong objective summary, academic paragraph, that includes all aspects below (W[5] H[1]). The answer to each of these questions below will help you keep track of notes that will eventually be used to write each academic paragraph.

Six Questions to Answer to Summarize a Research Article:5 “W” Questions and 1 “H” Question

1.
Who: Who conducted the study? (name of the author*)

*If more than two authors, the name you use must be the first (primary) author listed, who is responsible for ensuring the quality of others’ contributions followed by et al.

2.
When: In what year was the study conducted? (usually not the publication year)

3.
Where: In which city, state, or country was the study conducted?

4.
Why: Why was the study conducted – what did the researcher(s) hope to learn?

5.
How: How was the study conducted? —D
etailed description
including

methodology (
qualitative, quantitative, mixed-method, literature review, or meta-study), participants etc.

What: What did the researcher(s)
find? — Give the results of the study with specificity, so we understand the value of the study, and how it relates to the WHY

Writing an Objective Summary
11a

What to Do: Write A Short Version of the Article Focus on the 6 Important Questions:

Anyone reading the summary below knows

who
the main author is (last name of the first

author listed if there are more than one);

why
,

when

,
where,
and

how
the study was conducted;

and

what
the researcher(s) found
(5 “W” questions and 1 “H” question).

Good Example of an Objective Summary

Activity: Practice with Objective Summaries

Please Find the Answers to All Six Questions Below and Underline or Highlight Them!

Student Sample: Objective Summary

Writing an Objective Summary: What Not to Do
What NOT to Do: Write ABOUT the Article

The example below gives us information on what the article was about, but we are left in

the dark about
how the author conducted the study, and
what she found.

Bad Example

In the study, Chiara Dall’Ora et al. (2015), explained the connection between shift length and burnout among nurses in European countries. In the article, they tell why they conducted the research, how they conducted the research, and also gives the results of the research, providing statistics of the findings (Dall’Ora et al., 2015).

(Can you even find the W5 H1?)

What NOT to Do: Write
CONCLUSIONS/OPINIONS About the Article

The example below gives us information about what the reader’s
conclusions or
opinions

are.

BAD Example

In the study, Chiara Dall’Ora et al. (2015), explained the connection between shift length and burnout among nurses in European countries. This is an important issue because we have to make sure nurses are not burnt out so they can care for patients properly. In the article, they tell why they conducted the research, how they conducted the research, and they also give the results of the research, providing statistics of the findings. If more hospital administrators cared about the well-being of nurses and implemented change, we would have a better healthcare system (Dall’Ora et al., 2015

(Again, can you find the W5 H1?)

Rubric for Objective Summary

Please check off where your assignment is on each criterion in this rubric and submit it with your assignment

Criteria

Excellent

Not yet excellent

Not yet satisfactory

Free of opinion

Summary is free of opinion

Summary has one opinion word

Summary has more than one opinion word

Using own words

Summary is entirely in the student’s own words

A short phrase appears not to be in student’s own words

Piece has elements of plagiarism (some parts appear to be copied from the article being summarized)

Effectiveness of summary

Summary provides ALL 6 important points:

Who conducted the research (primary author)

Why?
Where?
When?
How?

What were the findings?

1 of the 6 questions is unanswered or is insufficiently answered

2 or more of the 6 questions are unanswered or are insufficiently answered

Activity: Notes for Research Articles, Notice My Capitalization

Complete this note sheet in two phases (based on ALL research articles found).

Phase 1: First answer questions 5 and 6 for each article below. IF you cannot find the answers to questions 5 and 6, that means your article is NOT a research article, so you must find a new one.

Phase 2: Once you have determined EACH article is a research article, AND your professor has approved them, you may complete questions 1-4 for each.

W(5)H(1): New Research Article #1 (Basic Research Article)

Who conducted the research?

2.
Why was the study completed (purpose / what researchers hoped to learn)
?

3.
When was data collected (not the publication year)
?

4.
Where was data collected (physical location)
?

(
examples:

in hospitals in NY State,

in rural China,

in 3 countries in Africa: Burkina Faso, Cameroon, and Djibouti)

5.
How was data collected (methodology)? Cut and paste the paragraph below that describes the methodology and HIGHLIGHT the indicator words that specifically show you the methodology
:

6.
What were the findings? Cut and paste the paragraph below that describes the findings and HIGHLIGHT the sentences that specifically show you the summary of findings:

W(5)H(1): New Research Article #2 (Basic Research Article)

1.
Who conducted the research?

2.
Why was the study completed (purpose / what researchers hoped to learn)
?

3.
When was data collected (not the publication year)
?

4.
Where was data collected (physical location)
?

(
examples:

in hospitals in NY State,

in rural China,

in 3 countries in Africa: Burkina Faso, Cameroon, and Djibouti)

5.
How was data collected (methodology)? Cut and paste the paragraph below that describes the methodology and HIGHLIGHT the indicator words that specifically show you the methodology
:

6.
What were the findings? Cut and paste the paragraph below that describes the findings and HIGHLIGHT the sentences that specifically show you the summary of findings:

W(5)H(1): New Research Article #3 (Basic OR Applied Research Article)

1.
Who conducted the research?

2.
Why was the study completed (purpose / what researchers hoped to learn)
?

3.
When was data collected (not the publication year)
?

4.
Where was data collected (physical location)
?

(
examples:

in hospitals in NY State,

in rural China,

in 3 countries in Africa: Burkina Faso, Cameroon, and Djibouti)

5.
How was data collected (methodology)? Cut and paste the paragraph below that describes the methodology and HIGHLIGHT the indicator words that specifically show you the methodology
:

6.
What were the findings? Cut and paste the paragraph below that describes the findings and HIGHLIGHT the sentences that specifically show you the summary of findings:

W(5)H(1): New Research Article #4 (Applied Research Article)

Who conducted the research?

2.
Why was the study completed (purpose / what researchers hoped to learn)
?

3.
When was data collected (not the publication year)
?

4.
Where was data collected (physical location)
?

(
examples:

in hospitals in NY State,

in rural China,

in 3 countries in Africa: Burkina Faso, Cameroon, and Djibouti)

5.
How was data collected (methodology)? Cut and paste the paragraph below that describes the methodology and HIGHLIGHT the indicator words that specifically show you the methodology
:

6.
What were the findings? Cut and paste the paragraph below that describes the findings and HIGHLIGHT the sentences that specifically show you the summary of findings:

Now that you have found all the parts to your research ‘scavenger hunt’, you need to consider what order you will present these in. Complete the next Activity to help you determine a logical order to present research. This Activity will be needed later, as well. Only after completing the Activity can you write your Review of Literature.

13a

Student Sample: Review of Literature

Review of Literature

Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Factors

Darling et al. (2021) conducted a study between 2001 and 2018 to examine the efficiency of qualified interventions in preterm birth, small for gestational age, low birth weight, neonatal death, cesarean deliveries, maternal care satisfaction, and coast effectiveness programs. A systematic review was used to collect data from the United States, France, Spain, and the Netherlands. The studies consisted of mostly non- Caucasian women from low-income population ranging from 12 to 46 years of age and being between 20 to 32 weeks’ gestation. Interventional programs were implemented into three categories: group prenatal care, augmented prenatal care, or a combination of both group and augmented prenatal care (Darling et al. 2021). The researchers found that certain interventions, such as prenatal care and augmented care, or a combination of both, may decrease adverse outcomes in small-for-gestational-age and preterm birth, and could aid in increasing maternal care satisfaction. Interventions that worked on enhancing coordination of care were found to result in providing more effective cost savings. The researchers also found disparities in the quality of access to care in the vulnerable population. There was insufficient evidence of suitable quality to confirm that the interventions were successful at enhancing clinical outcomes in prenatal care for at risk populations (Darling et al. 2021).
Similar observations were made in a study conducted by Nichols and Cohen (2020), between 2006 and 2018 to examine the methods used to improve the results of maternal mortality in California. The study was conducted using a scoping review to evaluate research on women and maternal health in the United States. The researchers used information from the US Maternal Fetal Medicine Network to measure the percentage of studies where pregnant women, women, and children were the main focus. The researchers also reviewed documentation on healthcare policies and practices from California’s public health department, healthcare foundation, and Maternal Quality Care Collaborative. Nichols and Cohen (2020) found that although the health of fetus and children could be adversely affected by the health of the mother, the majority of maternal programs in the United States places emphasis on the child. The researchers also found four areas of concern in women health experiences, both in pre and postnatal care. The problem areas entailed inadequate investment in women’s health, inefficient quality of care and avoidable caesarean delivers, expanding disparities in minority women and women living in rural areas, and contradictory collection and distribution of data (Nichols & Cohen, 2020).

Approaches to Improving Pregnancy Outcomes

In contrast to the preceding studies, Zhang et al. (2013) conducted a study between 2005 and 2007 to calculate the excessive rate of unfavorable outcomes in pregnancy within racial and ethnic groups. The study also aimed to measure the possibility of Medicaid savings that are linked to paid maternal care claims resulting from the inequalities that contribute to unfavorable maternal outcomes. A cross-sectional study using Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) data was used to gather pregnancy outcome information from inpatient hospitals from 14 states (Florida, Alabama, Arkansas, North Carolina, Georgia, Louisiana, Kentucky, Mississippi, Maryland, Missouri, Tennessee, South Carolina, Virginia, and Texas). The study consisted of a little over 2 million patients who were insured with Medicaid and had a delivery code of maternal delivery stay. Zhang et al. (2013) found that, with the exception of gestational diabetes, African American women showed the worst outcomes out of all unfavorable pregnancy outcomes. These disparities are postulated as being multi-factorial, having causes stemming from complicated experiences with racism, poverty, and complex healthcare interactions. It was also found that women covered under Medicaid health insurance were more likely to have consistency in care from prenatal care through delivery compared to their counterparts. However, due to participation in Medicaid programs being influenced by reimbursement rates, some providers may choose to stop accepting Medicaid patients because of reimbursement delays and low payment rates, which could contribute to negative birth outcomes (Zhang et al., 2013).

3.
Analysis of Literature

In that last paragraph, you will analyze what you have learned about your research problem through the research summarized in the Review of Literature. Different courses may ask you to consider varying but specific things during your analysis. In KG 604, you will present what is the same among your 3-4 research articles and what is different among methodologies, findings, and recommendations. After completing the Activity on the next pager, decide on the order in which you will present research articles and write your Review of Literature.

Activity: Analyze Your Research Articles: Compare and Contrast

Directions

Use Activity: Notes for Research Articles, Notice My Capitalization (on the pages between 13 and 14) to help you analyze below what is the same among your 3 research articles and what is different.
You must use language like the words listed below:

Sample comparison words
Sample contrast words

…similar to… …different from…

…like… …however…

…also… …on the other hand…

Example for You

If asked to write a complete sentence, comparing similarities among my research articles, I might come up with something like below. The example below only features two research articles. Be sure to include all of yours.
1.
What articles have similarities in each section below?

a.
Methodology

Dall’Ora et al. (2015) and Stimpfel et al. (2012) both used qualitative methods with large sample sizes; 31,627 (Dall’Ora et al., 2015) and 22,275 (Stimpfel et al., 2012)
b.
Findings

Both studies (Dall’Ora et al., 2015; Stimpfel et al., 2012) found a strong association between longer shifts and job dissatisfaction and the negative effects on patient satisfaction.
c.
Recommendations

Both studies (Dall’Ora et al., 2015; Stimpfel et al., 2012) suggest policy makers to use the findings to reconsider their current approach of increasing hours due to nurse shortage because of the long-term negative effects on nurses and patients.

1.
What articles have similarities in each section below?

a.
Methodology

b.
Findings

c.
Recommendations

2.
What articles have differences in each section below?

a.
Methodology

b.
Findings

c.
Recommendations

16a

Student Sample: Analysis of Literature

Analysis of Literature

In the United States, the persistence of maternal mortality continues to be a problem area in public health. The contributing factors that impact pregnancy outcomes persist in burdening the U.S., leading to poor healthcare quality, and increasing health disparities. The studies used in this literature review each used a different form of research methodology to collect data, including systematic and scoping reviews and cross-sectional studies. Similarly, Darling et al. (2021), Nichols and Cohen (2020), and Zhang et al. (2013) have emphasized the correlation between race/ethnicity and financial status playing a part in influencing quality of care, access of care, and pregnancy outcomes in pregnant minority women. To mitigate the disparities in maternal health Darling et al. (2021) and Zhang et al. (2013) suggested that interventions should be inspected and geared towards determining and eradicating the racial and ethnic disparities that affect pregnancy-related outcomes. Whereas Nichols and Cohen (2020) suggested focusing on exploring the distinctive experiences of particular at-risk subgroups of women, such as women in prison, who are of childbearing age, and the pregnant women who are less likely to pursue prenatal care, such as undocumented women.

Activity: Checklist for the Literature Review

(
your professor may want this to be submitted with your literature review)

Part 1: Introductory Paragraph to Literature Review

Steps

Description of Steps

Check

Opening sentence: isolate your research problem, with citation

Explain why it is necessary to solve this problem

Ensure your reader that you have only included research articles in the literature review and identify the main theme among them

If you notice multiple factors, you should list them

Include the names of the databases you used to conduct your research from the Monroe College Library

Lastly, list any search words/terms you used in order to find your research articles

Part 2: Review of Literature

1st paragraph is the objective summary of the first research article with limitations.

2nd paragraph includes a transition word from the first research article to the objective

summary of the second research article with limitations.

3rd paragraph includes a transition word from the first research article to the objective

summary of the second research article with limitations.

Flow

Is organized by findings, geography, methodology, or time

Uses headings to help your readers find their way

Uses transition words like compare/contrast words so the reader sees the flow

from article to article

Sample comparison words
Sample contrast words

…similar to… …different from…

…like… …however…

…also… …on the other hand…

Part 3: Analysis of Literature

Includes similarities and differences of methodologies

Includes similarities and differences of findings

Includes similarities and differences of recommendations

17a

Discussion: Mitigation Recommendation
17b

Important: the requirements of the Discussion Section may differ from one course to the next. Therefore, it is very important to read directions carefully to understand what your professor is asking.

For KG 604, you will use research conducted throughout the semester that reports on your research problem; you will use this to introduce your discussion. This is important, as it provides ‘proof’ that the problem is relevant today.

Activity: Reintroduce and Summarize the Problem and Populations Affected
(think of this like your formal introduction into the Discussion section)

Complete the Orange Columns.

Steps

Task

Description of Steps

Your Notes

In-Text Citations

Summarize:

Whatever your research problem is, you will need to summarize the proof that the
problem exists today by

1. Identify the problem:

2. Identify populations affected:

3. Identify the location:

1.
the problem

2.
populations affected by

providing an ‘example’ of your research problem happening in the world.

the problem
3.
location of the problem, if applicable

For your ‘example’, you will use articles found for KG- 604, but in other courses it
may be a case study from

your textbook, a summary of

the problem provided by your

professors, or you may need

to find a relevant ‘case’ on

your own.

Activity: Find a Company/Organization/Policy Working to Mitigate the Problem
17c

Complete the orange columns in your notebook.

Steps

Task

Description of Steps

Your Notes

In-Text Citations

Use p. 18 to find and summarize an existing evidence-based solution to use as a foundation to YOUR

recommendation.

Conduct further research using methods on p. 18 to find a company/organization/ program/policy that is doing a good job trying to mitigate this problem (this could be from another state or even another country where populations are comparable).

1. Name of company/organization/ program/policy:

2. Include detailed evidence that this ‘solution’ is working (do not forget to include dates/years, and statistics as support):

3. Identify specific ‘parts’ of the ‘solution’ that you wish to recommend:

Guidance: Foundation to Your Recommendation

Through Your Existing Sources

1. Go to your news article or any of the research articles used for the Literature Review

2. Do any of the above sources mention a policy, program, law, etc. that has been implemented to help reduce the problem?

3. If yes, go to Google and find that policy, program, law etc. (save it)

4. If no, proceed below.

Through Additional Sources

If your news article or any of your research articles do not tell you about a law, policy, or program etc. that has been implemented to help reduce your research problem, please use the guidance below to help you find a foundation policy, program, law, etc. You will need this for next class.

1. Go to Google
-OR- the Monroe College Library databases associated with your major (see pp. 8-9 in the
Foundations text for databases you should be using)

2. Type in the search bar your research problem + population + chosen search term

Your Research Problem

+ Population +

Search Terms

· Legislation
· Policy
· Law
· Intervention
· Program
· Education

Activity: Develop Your Recommendation with Evidence

Complete the orange columns in your notebook.

Steps

Task

Description of Steps

Your Notes

In-Text Citations

Form your recommendation

Use your selected company/organization/ program/policy as a basis for your recommendation.

Connect this recommendation to the research problem.

1. Identify what is the same and different between your research population and the ‘solution’s’ population:

Same:

Different:

2. Explain how you envision the “specific parts of the ‘solution’” helping to mitigate your research problem:

18a

Student Sample: Discussion

Discussion

There is current evidence that racial disparities in healthcare among pregnant women continues to be a problem in the United States. In an article published by The New York Times, there has been a persistence and growth in racial disparity throughout the years despite calls to take action to improve medical care access for women of color (Rabin, 2019). Similarly, in a study conducted by Nichols and Cohen (2019) mounting disparities continue amid women health outcomes in the United States, primarily among race and ethnicity and within residents living in urban and rural areas (Nichols and Cohen, 2019). These disparities directly affect African American, Alaska Native and Native American Women (Rabin, 2019). When compared to other high-income countries, the United States has substandard records in maternal health outcomes, and while the rate of maternal mortality dropped across the world, America’s maternal health outcomes have worsened (Rabin, 2019).
To reduce the disparities among minority women policy changes have been made. Federal law enacted the Preventing Maternal Death Act providing states with grants to explore, examine and investigate pregnancy related deaths for up to one year after the birth of a child (Rabin, 2019). Also, The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists created new guidelines in treating cardiovascular disease in pregnant women (Rabin, 2019). In 2014 Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health (AIM) was developed by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology to collaborate with partners of the states and hospitals to gather information on safety measures being taken to improve maternal health outcomes, allowing partners to assess and track program progress (Nichols and Cohen, 2019). In the study conducted by Nichols and Cohen (2019), two out of the various programs that California implemented were the Black Infant Health Program (BIH) and increasing the states income eligibility for pregnant women to 200% of the federal poverty level. With the implementation of these programs, mortality rates decreased from 22.1% to 8.3% in the best practices toolkit, a program developed for hemorrhage and high blood pressure during pregnancy. Altogether, California’s maternal mortality rate decreased by above 50% between 2006 and 2018 (Nichols and Cohen, 2019). To prevent negative pregnancy outcomes in women of color, California used federal funds to develop programs that focused on African American mothers and the health determinants that are influenced by social and structural factors. The Black Infant Health Program provided support to African American women through group trainings, entailing of stress reduction, life skills development, and building social support (Nichols and Cohen, 2019). Nearly half of the babies born in the United States are insured under Medicaid which covers the child through the first year of life. However, in most states, Medicaid provides coverage for the mother until 60 days postpartum, after which the mother must meet the federal poverty level to be eligible for coverage (Nichols and Cohen, 2019). This exposes the mother to various risks that can adversely affect her health. Expanding Medicaid access would mitigate the maternal healthcare barriers that affect low socioeconomic minority women.
Racial disparities in maternal healthcare are a persistent problem in the United States. African American mothers experience higher adverse pregnancy outcomes and are less likely to obtain sufficient prenatal care when compared to Caucasian women (Zhang et al., 2013). Similarly, racial disparities among women of color are made worse by partialities in the healthcare that they receive (Nichols and Cohen, 2019). To mitigate racial disparities in maternal health among minority women it is important to understand the determinants that contribute to their health outcomes. With increased federal funding, programs can be geared towards providing quality care to women of color. This can be established by utilizing specific methods of care that are relatable to those being serviced in the community, providing them with medical professionals that are culturally competent and adequately trained in servicing underserved communities, fostering a trusting provider-patient relationship. Nichols and Cohen (2019) suggest that funding should be used to address the social factors that influence maternal health to reduce the psychosocial risks in women who may be more vulnerable to adverse pregnancy outcomes. The pregnancy-related risks of a mother do not end after her child’s birth. The expansion of Medicaid access and coverage would provide a mother with the means of receiving adequate care during all stages of pregnancy and during the postpartum period, in which she can still be adversely affected from her pregnancy. It is vital for the federal government to enact policies requiring states to provide medical coverage to women for one year after the birth of their child. Providing coverage to various specialties would ensure the mother has efficient access to care should adverse symptoms develop. Nichols and Cohen (2019) postulated that state programs should expand Medicaid coverage for women focusing on their healthcare needs before, during and after pregnancy, paying close attention to women’s health and chronic disease management, especially to those who have or had high risk pregnancies. Implementing these programs would develop a foundation in the quality of racial maternal care across all states and provide cohesion and uniformity in the delivery of care.

Conclusion Paragraph

For the last paragraph of your research paper, you will simply reiterate and connect main ideas discussed in your paper to your recommendation.

Student Sample: Conclusion

Conclusion

As seen in one of California’s intervention programs, the Black Infant Health Program (Nichols and Cohen, 2019), a program which provided support to African American women through group trainings, which entailed stress reduction techniques, life skills development, and the building of social support enabled mitigation efforts to be focused and geared around the influencing factors that contributed to adverse pregnancy outcomes among the minority women within the community, thus reducing and preventing negative pregnancy outcomes in women of color. African American, American Indian, and Alaska Native women are up to three times more likely to die from adverse pregnancy related outcomes, a disparity that increases with age (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2019). In the United States, maternal mortality and adverse health outcomes persist within the minority community and as a result racial disparities in healthcare among pregnant women is a current preventable public health concern, therefore it is vital to understand the determinants of health that influences negative pregnancy related outcomes in minority women.

Continue to the checklist on the next page; your professor may require it.

Activity: Checklist to the Conclusion Paragraph:
22a

· I restated my research problem (Y/N)

· I restated recommendations provided in the literature review (Y/N)

· I have included the name of company/organization/program/policy, which is the basis for my recommendation (Y/N)
· I have explained why I believe the above company/organization/program/policy will work to mitigate the problem shown in my news article (Y/N)

Space for Notes:

References
RACIAL DISPARITIES IN HEALTH IN PREGNANT WOMEN 23

References (bold, centered, & on the first line)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019, September 6). Racial and ethnic disparities continue in pregnancy-related deaths. https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2019/p0905- racial-ethnic-disparities-pregnancy-deaths.html

0.5”

1 tab (hanging indent)

Darling, E. K., Cody, K., Meara Tubman-Broeren, & Marquez, O. (2021). The effect of prenatal care delivery models targeting populations with low rates of PNC attendance: A systematic review. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 32(1), 119- 136. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/effect-prenatal-care-delivery-modelstargeting/docview/2507722229/se-2
Nichols, C. R., & Cohen, A. K. (2021). Preventing maternal mortality in the United States: Lessons from California and policy recommendations. Journal of Public Health Policy, 42(1), 127-144.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-020-00264-9

Rabin, R. C. (2019, May 8). Huge racial disparities persist in pregnancy-related deaths, and are growing. New York Times, A20(L). https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A584694288/ITOF?u=nysl_me_moncol&sid=bookmarkITOF&xid=b9422ff9
Zhang, S., Cardarelli, K., Shim, R., Ye, J., Booker, K. L., & Rust, G. (2013). Racial disparities in economic and clinical outcomes of pregnancy among Medicaid recipients. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 17(8), 1518+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A344827866/PPNU?u=nysl_me_moncol&sid=bookmarkPPNU&xid=51747d5

Lead authors are listed on this page alphabetically

Rubric for References Page

Please check off where your assignment is on each criterion in this rubric Complete and submit it with your assignment

Criteria

Excellent

Not yet excellent

Word References is in bold and centered 1” from top of page

Word References is not yet in bold and centered 1” from top of page

Everything, including the page number, is in Times New Roman

12. Page number is in

upper right corner

Everything, including the page number, is in Times New Roman 12. Page number is in upper right corner

Not everything on the page is yet in Times New Roman 12 point in upper right corner

Each reference is correctly formatted in APA 7 style

Not all references are yet correctly formatted in APA 7 style

References are double-spaced,

in alphabetical order, with no extra spaces between them

References are double-spaced, in alphabetical order, with no extra spaces between them

References are not yet double- spaced, in alphabetical order, with no extra spaces between them

References Format for Journal Articles – APA 7

‘Formula’ for Journal Articles:

Lastname, FirstInitial. MiddleInitial., & Lastname, FirstInitial. MiddleInitial. (Year). Title of article following capitalization rules: Capitalize the first letter of first word, first letter of first word after mid-title punctuation, and any Proper Noun.
Title of Academic Journal: Proper Noun Capitalization,
vol#(issue#), page#-page#. Full doi web address

image3

image4

image5

image6

image7

image8

image9

image10

image11

image14

image12

image13

image15

image16

image17

image18

image19

image20

image21

image22

image23

image26

image27

image24

image25

image290

image30

image28

image29

image31

image32

image33

image34

image1

image2

Ponzi Schemes in relation to Cryptocurrency

Student’s name

Professor’s name

Course title

Institution

Date

Ponzi Schemes in relation to Cryptocurrency

1.
What articles have similarities in each section below?

a.
Methodology

There was a similarity in the methodology that Galletta & Pinelli (2023) and He et al. (2022) used. Galletta & Pinelli (2023) utilized experimental evaluation to classify different forms of fraud. Likewise, He et al. (2022) performed experiments to explore cryptocurrency fraud.

b.
Findings

Across the board, the studies indicated that fraud in relation to cryptocurrency has been on the rise. The literature review by Trozze et al. (2022) found several classifications of fraud associated with cryptocurrency. Their research showed that Ponzi schemes were the most common form of fraud. Galletta and Pinelli (2023) also showed that there is a high number of Ponzi investments nowadays. Phan et al. (2019) showed that most conversations across social media reflected the frequency in the existence of cryptocurrency scams. Similarly, the experiments by Phan et al. (2019) also revealed the existence of a significant number of Ponzi contracts. Generally, the studies depicted that Ponzi schemes have become very frequent in crypto.

c.
Recommendations

Trozze et al. (2022) recommended that there is a need for more research on the subject and the determination of effective measures for mitigation. On the same note, Phan et al. (2019) stated that further research is necessary to expand the understanding of crypto scams and ways to prevent them. He et al. (2022) also recommended the need for further studies to enable the detection and prevention of Ponzi schemes.

2.
What articles have differences in each section below?

a.
Methodology

Whereas He et al. (2022) and Galletta & Pinelli (2023) used experimental methodology, Phan et al. (2019) used observation, while Trozze et al. (2022) conducted their study through the use of systematic review. In addition, Galletta & Pinelli (2023) and He et al. (2022) relied on open-source, whereas Phan et al. (2019) used social media (Twitter) and Trozze et al. (2022) used publication databases.

b.
Findings

While the findings from all studies pointed to the rise in crypto scams, they featured variations in their focus points. While Trozze et al. (2022) focused on classifying the frequency of different forms of crypto fraud, including Ponzi schemes, pump-and-dump schemes, and market manipulation, Galletta and Pinelli (2023) and He et al. (2022) on the other hand only focused on Ponzi schemes and smart Ponzi contracts associated with Ethereum. The study by Phan et al. (2019) was also different from the other research in that their findings featured coverage of scams and fraud in general. Their research observed the entirety of conversations associated with cryptocurrency, scams, and fraud.

c.
Recommendations

The recommendations by He et al. (2022), Phan et al. (2019), and Trozze et al. (2022) mainly revolved around conducting more research to aid the understanding or detection, and prevention of crypto fraud. In contrast, Galletta & Pinelli (2023) looked at further developing a model for classifying and detecting different forms of cryptocurrency fraud.

References

Galletta, L., & Pinelli, F. (2023). Sharpening Ponzi Schemes Detection on Ethereum with Machine Learning.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.04872. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.04872

He, X., Yang, T., & Chen, L. (2022). CTRF: Ethereum-Based Ponzi Contract Identification.
Security and Communication Networks,
2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1554752

Phan, L., Li, S., & Mentzer, K. (2019). Blockchain technology and the current discussion on fraud.
Information Systems and Analytics Journal Articles. https://digitalcommons.bryant.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1027&context=cisjou\

Trozze, A., Kamps, J., Akartuna, E. A., Hetzel, F. J., Kleinberg, B., Davies, T., & Johnson, S. D. (2022). Cryptocurrencies and future financial crime.
Crime Science,
11, 1-35. 10.1186/s40163-021-00163-8

Objective Summary: Ponzi Schemes in Relation to Cryptocurrency

Student Name

Department, Institution

Course Title

Instructor Name

Due Date

Objective Summary: Ponzi Schemes in relation to Cryptocurrency

Phan et al. (2019) researched the blockchain issue and what scams blockchain users endure when using such technology. The three authors are qualified to be in the study because they are members of Bryant University. The authors add their research to a prominent journal with several other commendable volumes. Since several individuals and companies globally are moving to a new cashless payment method of crypto, the researchers wanted to discover the fraudulent problems involved. The authors purposed to review the issue of cryptocurrency and how enterprises are adopting this new method of making payments. Phan et al. (2019) conducted this research in the year 2018 after having to collect Twitter data from November to December.

The research had no based geographical boundaries as the data in use came from various sources across the globe. Twitter can generate data from various locations worldwide as long as the authors use specific words that pertain to the research. The researchers used Twitter as a social media platform to gather data from tweets that mentioned the keywords of the study. The researchers used 7,901 tweets already in English, combining original tweets, retweets, and quoted ones or replies. The researchers wanted to contribute to the research surrounding blockchain technology and using bitcoin to make payments. The researchers were determining the kinds of scams that cryptocurrency users face when dealing with that means of payment. The researchers revealed tweets that had the words mentioned most times relating to the topic. The research showed that this payment technology is very secure, prompting users to look out for scams. The research revealed that fraud in this new payment method was rampant in first-world nations that deeply use it.

References

Phan, L., Li, S., & Mentzer, K. (2019). Blockchain technology and the current discussion on fraud. https://iacis.org/iis/2019/4_iis_2019_8-20

Phase 1

a: Ponzi Schemes in relation to Cryptocurrency

Student’s name

Professor’s name

Course title

Institution

Date

Phase 13a: Ponzi Schemes in relation to Cryptocurrency

W(5)H(1): New Research Article #1: Cryptocurrencies and future financial crime

1.
How was data collected (methodology)? Cut and paste the paragraph below that describes the methodology and HIGHLIGHT the indicator words that specifically show you the methodology
:

Data was collected through systematic review of various literature and research on cryptocurrency scams.

“This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items
for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) protocol.”

“To be considered for this
scoping review, published studies had to meet various eligibility criteria. First, we limited our review to publications written in English as we relied entirely on our reviewers’ language skills. The
academic literature portion of the scoping review exclusively focused on academic articles such as peer-reviewed journals and conference papers due to the study’s aim of mapping out current research activities. The
grey literature review included reports, publications, and alerts. By implication, the
review excludes publications such as blog posts, op-eds, presentations, newsletters, marketing materials, correspondence, and magazine or newspaper articles” (Trozze et al.,

022).

“The
review used Google Scholar (GS) to
identify academic studies for review and Google’s Search Engine to identify private and public sector publications potentially eligible for review.
2 One of the authors (AT) performed the final and most recent search on GS and Google’s Search Engine in November 2020” (Trozze et al., 2022).

What were the findings? Cut and paste the paragraph below that describes the findings and HIGHLIGHT the sentences that specifically show you the summary of findings:

The results indicated that there are 29 types of fraud associated with cryptocurrency.

“Academic publications most frequently referred to Ponzi schemes and (synonymous)
high yield investment programmes (HYIPs). These scam types were discussed in 44.4% of the included studies. Eighteen (28.6%) publications analysed
scams involving initial coin offerings (ICOs). Ten analyses (15.9%) covered
phishing scams and nine (14.3%) discussed unspecified types of fraud. Seven (11.1%) studies covered
pump-and-dump schemes and market manipulation. Six (9.5%) studies looked at
exchange scams and five (7.9%) at
scam wallet services. Four papers (4.8%) discussed each of the following types of fraud:
fraudulent cryptocoins, smart contract honeypots / attacks, and mining scams. Three publications (4.8%) discussed
mining malware and the same number addressed
smart Ponzi schemes. Two (3.2%) publications discussed
securities fraud and identity theft. Sixteen fraud categories were only mentioned in a single (1.6%) publication each. The second iteration of the search identified 17 new types of fraud from the literature” (Trozze et al., 2022).

“Altogether, 36 of the grey literature publications came from private sector companies. These publications identified
32 different types of cryptocurrency fraud, 14 of which were not identified in the academic literature” (Trozze et al., 2022).

“Most private sector studies (63.9%) referred to some
unspecified type of fraud or scam. Fourteen (38.9%) publications analysed
scams involving ICOs and 13 (36.1%) discussed
Ponzi schemes or HYIPs. Nine (25.0%) studies covered
phishing and seven (19.4%)
covered mining malware. Four studies (11.1%) looked at
SIM swapping, which did not appear in the academic literature, and which is defined in Appendix
3: Table

Table7.7

. Four studies (11%) also discussed giveaway scams. Three studies (8.3%) discussed
market manipulation, forex fraud, and/or exchange scams. Two studies (5.6%) looked at
impersonation scams, mining scams, pump-and-dumps, and/or securities fraud. Eighteen fraud categories were mentioned in a single publication each (2.8%)” (Trozze et al., 2022).

W(5)H(1): New Research Article #2: Sharpening Ponzi Schemes Detection on Ethereum with Machine Learning

1.
How was data collected (methodology)? Cut and paste the paragraph below that describes the methodology and HIGHLIGHT the indicator words that specifically show you the methodology
:

The methodology entails application of experimental procedures.

“In this section, we build binary classifiers for detecting smart Ponzi contracts, and we perform an
experimental evaluation to study how the new features of Section IV impact classification and the quality of the obtained classifiers.”

2.
What were the findings? Cut and paste the paragraph below that describes the findings and HIGHLIGHT the sentences that specifically show you the summary of findings:

The results showed that it is possible to assess and effectively classify cryptocurrency fraud from a credible investment.

“The two populations present a different behaviour for what concerns the input transactions (Tx_in): the plot of the cumulative distribution presents a very different shape. Typically,
smart Ponzi presents a small number of input transactions with few exceptions with many transactions. The same happens for features Investment_in/TX_in, Payment_out/TX_out where
smart Ponzi generally present larger values than the other class. We expect that these features provide the classifier with a relevant contribution to discriminate between the two classes” (Galletta & Pinelli, 2023).

W(5)H(1): New Research Article #3: Blockchain technology and the current discussion on fraud.

1.
How was data collected (methodology)? Cut and paste the paragraph below that describes the methodology and HIGHLIGHT the indicator words that specifically show you the methodology
:

The data was collected through observation.

“To understand how fraud and blockchain topic are discussed on social media, a
twitter listener was developed using Apache Flume and approximately 2 million tweets were collected during November 8th and December 31, 2018 using “blockchain” as the
keyword. From this pool of tweets, 7,901 are tweets that include both “
fraud” and “
blockchain” in the tweet text and are written in English. Those tweets will be used in the analysis. About 41% (3,199) are original tweets, 51% of them are retweets (4,062) and the rest (8%, 649 tweets) are either quoted tweets or replies. Issues in Information Systems Volume 20, Issue 4, pp. x-x, 2019 13 This following section will first discuss top words and sentiment words in original tweets on blockchain fraud discussion, followed by a sentiment analysis about this topic. We also
identify top influencers in the topic by looking at the frequency of retweets and eigenvector centrality” (Phan et al., 2019).

2.
What were the findings? Cut and paste the paragraph below that describes the findings and HIGHLIGHT the sentences that specifically show you the summary of findings:

The findings indicate that fraud in cryptocurrency has become commonplace and has influenced conversations.

“The findings of this research show that the most frequently mentioned words in tweets include
scam, tax, combat, fight,
bitcoin, crypto, payment, Asia, Japan, Germany, Thailand and banks. The top sentiment words are
scam, combat, fight, fraudulent, prison, swift,
frauds, hacked, prevent, and guilty” (Phan et al., 2019).

“It can be seen that people are
more aware and concerned about the scams and barely mentioned other security attacks such as the 51% attack and hard fork. In addition, the
frequency and severity of scams
are much greater than other issues because blockchain is structured in a very secure way, making other attacks more difficult to occur” (Phan et al., 2019).

W(5)H(1): New Research Article #4: CTRF: Ethereum-Based Ponzi Contract Identification

1.
How was data collected (methodology)? Cut and paste the paragraph below that describes the methodology and HIGHLIGHT the indicator words that specifically show you the methodology
:

Data was collected through conducting an experiment.

“In our
experiments, we eliminated two non-Ponzi contract addresses that were not successfullydeployed and found two addresses with exactly opposite labels to other address sets” (He et all., 2022).

“
Datasets. To compare the validity of the datasets and features, we did
experiments on four main datasets” (He et all., 2022).

“We
conducted independent experiments on these four datasets: first cross-validating to find the best
experimental parameters, then using 70% of the dataset for training and 30% for testing, and finally
conducting 20 experiments to calculate the average results” (He et all., 2022).

2.
What were the findings? Cut and paste the paragraph below that describes the findings and HIGHLIGHT the sentences that specifically show you the summary of findings:

Ponzi schemes are evident in matters to do with cryptocurrency.

“We observed a
large number of Ponzi contracts and found that when most of them receive a transfer from an external account, they will determine whether the amount of the transfer is less than the minimum investment threshold set by the contract” (He et all., 2022).

Parameters and Database used

References

Galletta, L., & Pinelli, F. (2023). Sharpening Ponzi Schemes Detection on Ethereum with Machine Learning.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.04872. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.04872

He, X., Yang, T., & Chen, L. (2022). CTRF: Ethereum-Based Ponzi Contract Identification.
Security and Communication Networks,
2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1554752

Phan, L., Li, S., & Mentzer, K. (2019). Blockchain technology and the current discussion on fraud. https://digitalcommons.bryant.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1027&context=cisjou\

W E L C O M E B A C K
PA R T I : T H E L I T E R AT U R E R E V I E W

PA R T I I : L E V E L H E A D I N G S

PA R T I I I : W O R K S H O P F O R H W !

Part I: The Literature Review

The Basic Structure of the RESEARCH PAPER

Which parts have you done?

What comes NEXT?

What IS a Literature Review???

Think about this…

Literature

Review
what could it be?

What IS a Literature Review???

Usually, PART of a research paper

An objective summary of what the
research literature says about your
topic or question.

A demonstration of your familiarity
with pertinent work in the field.

A research history, upon which later
research can be built.

What IS a Literature Review???

Usually, PART of a research paper

Contains several objective
summaries of what the research
literature says about your topic or
question.

A demonstration of your familiarity
with pertinent work in the field.

A research history, upon which later
research can be built.

What IS a Literature Review???

Usually, PART of a research paper

Contains several objective summaries
of what the research literature says
about your topic or question.

A demonstration of your familiarity
with pertinent work in the field.

A research history, upon which later
research can be built.

What IS a Literature Review???

Usually, PART of a research paper

An objective summary of what the
research literature says about your
topic or question.

A demonstration of your familiarity
with pertinent work in the field.

A research history, upon which later
research can be built.

Let’s look at two samples:

1. Student sample
2. Doctoral sample

First, the Student sample on p. 49 to 51in
your manuals.

Treasure hunt!
See if you can find two compare/contrast
transition phrases at the beginnings of two
of the paragraphs on page 50

Now, a Doctoral sample

In this week’s folder:

”Dr. Bouteneff Dissertation-see chapter 2”

note: it’s in a slightly different style (APA 5), and
the introductory paragraph is not written in the
way you will write yours, but still worth looking at!

(When will you get YOUR doctorate??)

A literature review consists of 3 parts

1. Introduction Paragraph for the Literature Review

2. Review of Literature

3. Analysis of Literature

See page 42 in your resource manuals

A literature review consists of 3 parts

1. Introduction Paragraph for the Literature Review

2. Review of Literature

3. Analysis of Literature

A literature review consists of 3 parts

1. Introduction Paragraph for the Literature Review

2. Review of Literature

3. Analysis of Literature

A literature review consists of 3 parts

1. Introduction Paragraph for the Literature Review

2. Review of Literature

3. Analysis of Literature

What part of the
literature review

have you started on?

1. Introduction Paragraph for the Literature Review

2. Review of Literature

3. Analysis of Literature

Without even realizing it!!

What part of the
literature review

have you started on?

1. Introduction Paragraph for the Literature Review

2. Review of Literature

3. Analysis of Literature

What part of the
literature review

have you started on?

1. Introduction Paragraph for the Literature Review

2. Review of Literature (Wait! What?? How??)

3. Analysis of Literature

Your

GRADED and REVISED
Objective Summary

will be copied
right into the

Review of Literature
(with your three more,

newly written
objective summaries)

BUT…

In what order will you

present the research?

I have a task to help you with
this!
To Blackboard! First I will show you your task and then expand

upon its importance to your paper.

To make your literature review “flow,” you
will need to see what is the same and what is
different among them: (Remember the
treasure hunt? )

• like

• similar to

• also

• in the same way

• at the same time

• unlike

• in contrast

• contrasted with

• on the contrary

• while…

compare contrastand

Part II: Level Headings

Now, organize them according to patterns
you found, and use appropriate level
headings to guide your reader

Level I header

Your written work goes here in paragraph

format only.

Level II Header (sub-level of H1)

Your written work goes here in paragraph

format only.

Level III Header (sub-level of H2)

Your written work goes here in paragraph

format only.

Let’s take a look at a fellow
student’s research paper
Week 6 folder

Just a Note about your Review of Literature!

Typically, each level heading should include at least

three research articles, but, as this is a foundations

course, you will only provide a total of four research

articles for your Literature Review and you need a

minimum of 2 Level II headers

Part III: Workshop!

Ready, Set, GO!
1. Pull up the p. 13a in your Final ‘Mission’ Packet. Here, you have

your W(5) H(1) notes for EACH research article.
IF you do not have ALL FOUR research articles, find them now.
RESUBMIT 13a. Phase I and complete Phase II in your packet before
moving onto #2.

2. Open and complete p. 16a in your Final ‘Mission’ Packet which
will help you compare and contrast your research articles to
decide upon the order you will present them in your Review of
Literature.

3. CUT and PASTE p. 16a it into a new Word document to be
submitted to Blackboard for HW.

Congratulations! You just completed the
necessary work to help you determine the
order of articles for your Review of Literature!

1. Introduction Paragraph for the Literature Review

2. Review of Literature

3. Analysis of Literature

Welcome!

This is an exciting day!

You will be completing the literature review
section of your research paper!

Congratulations! You have what you need for
part 2 of the literature review!

Introduction Paragraph for the Literature Review

Review of Literature

Analysis of Literature

Now, let’s write Part 1!

Introduction Paragraph for the Literature Review

Review of Literature

Analysis of Literature

Part 1: Introduction paragraph
(this will be for workshop, so pay attention!)