While you are in the infancy of thinking about your dissertation topic, it helps to begin with the end in mind. During your literature review, you will uncover a gap in the scholarship on your proposed topic. While this gap may be content or methodological-specific, it is critical to think about the type of methodology your study will employ as you begin your search. Therefore, you will review the University of the Cumberland’s doctoral research handbook for approved research designs. You will not be “locked in” to your choice until your IRB is approved in DSRT 839, but you should have a general idea of how you will collect data on your proposed topic. Directions: 1. Review the appendices of the doctoral research handbook to determine a possible research design for your study. 2. Start a new thread in this discussion board whereby you include the following:
- One brief paragraph overview of your proposed dissertation topic. Topic is Cyber Security
- One brief paragraph overview of the theories related to your topic. This should include at least one in-text citation.
- One brief paragraph about how your topic relates to the goals of your academic program.
- One brief paragraph about the methodology and study design you believe you will use with the topic after reviewing the approved designs in the appendix of the doctoral research handbook. This paragraph should also include how you plan to collect data on this topic.
- Reference list for any in-text citations included.
3. Reply to one other classmate providing support and coaching for their topic and proposed methodology.
Plagiarism freeAPA Format
1
Updated 3/24202
2
Implemented: Summer 20
22
GRADUATE SCHOOL
DOCTORAL RESEARCH HANDBOOK
2
Table of Contents
Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
3
Doctoral Program and Research Process …………………………………………………………………………. 3
Purpose of the Handbook ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3
Doctoral Research Committee …………………………………………………………………………………………… 3
Choosing Committee Members ……………………………………………………………………………………… 3
Committee Chair Responsibilities. ………………………………………………………………………………
4
Responsibilities of Other Committee Members ……………………………………………………………..
5
Candidate Responsibilities …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5
Doctoral Research Guidelines …………………………………………………………………………………………….
6
Choosing a Research Topic …………………………………………………………………………………………… 6
Doctoral Research Timeline ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6
Dissertation Seminar (DSRT 736) ………………………………………………………………………………. 6
Advanced Research (DSRT 839) ………………………………………………………………………………… 6
Dissertation Sequence (DSRT 930-932) ……………………………………………………………………….
7
Doctoral Research Probation Process …………………………………………………………………………..
8
Doctoral Research Style ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8
Quantitative Research ……………………………………………………………………………………………………
9
Qualitative Dissertations ………………………………………………………………………………………………
10
Mixed-Methods Dissertations ……………………………………………………………………………………….
11
Final Document ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 11
Doctoral Research Approval Process …………………………………………………………………………….. 11
Human Subjects Research: Participant Sampling and Recruitment ……………………………………
12
Site Authorization …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 12
Social Media and Internet Recruitment ………………………………………………………………………
13
Third-Party Paid Recruitment Services ………………………………………………………………………. 13
Oral Defense ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
14
Graduation …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
15
Appendix A: Quantitative Dissertation (Traditional Five Chapter Format) …………………………….
16
Appendix B: Doctoral Project (Quantitative: Applied Research Format) ……………………………….
18
Appendix C: Qualitative Dissertation Format …………………………………………………………………….
20
Appendix D: Qualitative (Historical) and Mixed Methods Dissertation Information ………………. 22
Appendix E: Doctoral Research Evaluation Rubric …………………………………………………………….
23
Appendix F: Quantitative Research Design ………………………………………………………………………..
24
Appendix G: Applied Research Design ……………………………………………………………………………..
25
Appendix H: Qualitative Research Design …………………………………………………………………………
26
3
Introduction
Doctoral Program and Research Process
The Graduate School at the University of the Cumberlands offers Doctor of Business
Administration, Doctor of Education, and Doctor of Philosophy degrees. The doctoral research,
designed to evaluate the candidate’s capabilities as a scholar, is the final academic requirement
of the DBA, EdD, and PhD programs. Candidates complete the doctoral research during
professional research courses (DSRT 736, 839, 930, 931), which are the last four courses taken
during the program. This handbook sets forth the guidelines for completing the dissertation or
doctoral project process.
Purpose of the Handbook
The purpose of this handbook is to guide candidates through the doctoral research
process, including developing the research, the oral defense, and final document submission. The
handbook outlines candidate and committee member responsibilities, defines writing guidelines,
identifies required sections for each chapter, and provides printing guidelines for the final
dissertation document. The handbook is to be used by instructors, dissertation chairs, and
committee members to ensure high standards related to the form and appearance of dissertations.
Doctoral Research Committee
Doctoral research committees are made up of three members, including the chair, and
two committee members. Each member has specific responsibilities, as outlined below.
Choosing Committee Members
While enrolled in DSRT 930, the candidate and the chair will identify instructors to serve
on his/her dissertation committee. The DSRT course instructor will serve as the chair. Other
members are to be instructors teaching at the graduate level at the University of the
4
Cumberlands. These members should be chosen based on doctoral research topic expertise and
candidate needs. The academic department will provide candidates with a list of instructors
available to serve on committees. The committee member request form is submitted to the
academic department, and any committee changes must be resubmitted to the academic
department.
Committee Chair Responsibilities.
Responsibilities of the committee chair include:
• Advising the candidate through the doctoral research process.
• Guiding the candidate in the selection of two additional committee members.
• Assisting the candidate in meeting deadlines for completion of the
doctoral research.
• Assisting the candidate in navigating the IRB approval process.
• Guiding the candidate in achieving a high level of technical and ethical quality in
doctoral research.
• Advising the candidate in the selection of methods/procedures for data collection and
analysis.
• Advising the candidate in proper APA style.
• Determining when a document is ready for review by the committee and communicate
such with committee members. The candidate should avoid consulting the full committee
for feedback without prior approval of the chair.
• Advising the candidate in preparation for the doctoral research defense.
• Notifying the department chair of the date, time, and location of all doctoral research
defense meetings.
5
• Submitting the defense scoring rubric from committee members to the department chair
promptly after the defense.
• Submitting a print-ready copy of the doctoral research to the department chair before the
anticipated graduation date of the candidate.
Responsibilities of Other Committee Members
Responsibilities of other committee members include:
• Providing subject matter expertise as requested by the chair or candidate.
• Reading drafts and providing meaningful feedback.
• Corresponding with the chair and candidate as needed for clarification and resolution of
methodological issues during the doctoral research process.
• Immediately notifying candidate and doctoral research chair when major flaws that are
likely to result in a candidate’s unsuccessful defense are identified.
• Signing the signature page promptly.
Candidate Responsibilities
Responsibilities of the doctoral research candidate include:
• Coordinating with the chair to select committee members based on expertise in the
doctoral research topic area. The candidate is encouraged to select at least one member
with expertise in data collection and analysis.
• Completing the IRB process to obtain approval for research before collecting data.
• Choosing a topic, submitting proofread drafts of materials to the chair, preparing
adequately for consultations, and communicating regularly with the chair.
• Contacting the chair in the event of any significant change in the personal or professional
situation, which may interfere with program completion.
6
• Successfully defending research.
• Submitting an error-free, print-ready copy of the dissertation as a pdf document to the
dissertation chair and the academic department promptly after a successful defense.
Doctoral Research Guidelines
Choosing a Research Topic
Candidates begin thinking about doctoral research topics when applying for admission to
the program. The doctoral research topics must be grounded in theory, related to program goals,
and have implications for practitioners. Candidates are encouraged to choose research topics of
personal relevance and significance. When opportunities arise in coursework, candidates should
begin researching these topics in the form of literature reviews and other assignments that allow
for research. The research topic will be narrowed to a research study and approved by the
department chair/director and subsequently the graduate school when candidates enroll in the
first doctoral research course, DSRT 736.
Doctoral Research Timeline
Dissertation Seminar (DSRT 736)
Candidates submit the topic approval form in DSRT 736, and the academic department
coordinates the topic approval process with the 736-course professor. Candidates complete the
review of the literature (Chapter Two) while enrolled in DSRT 736. Completing DSRT 736 is a
requirement for enrolling in DSRT 839.
Advanced Research (DSRT 839)
While enrolled in DSRT 839, candidates complete Chapter One, the introduction to the
dissertation or project, and Chapter Three, the methodology section. Candidates must apply for
approval for their doctoral dissertation or project from the Institutional Review Board while
7
enrolled in DSRT 839. IRB approval is required before collecting any data or developing the
project.
Comprehensive Exams
During enrollment in DSRT 839, students complete their Comprehensive Exams.
Through coordination with the Graduate School, Academic Departments provide study sessions,
materials, and remediation as necessary. Students will sign up for the exams during designated
testing windows. Passing the Comprehensive Exams is a requirement to pass DSRT 839 and
proceed to DSRT 930. If a student fails the Comprehensive Exams, or a
portion of the
Comprehensive Exams, remediation is required and provided through the Graduate School and
the Academic Department. A student must participate in remediation and sign up for a second
attempt after two weeks of additional preparation. If a student fails the second attempt, then
additional remediation is required. A student must participate in remediation and sign up for a
final attempt four weeks after additional preparation. If a student fails the third attempt, then a
grade of F is recorded for the DSRT 839 class, and the student may be dismissed from the
doctoral program.
Dissertation Sequence (DSRT 930-932)
A completed Chapter One, Two, and Three are required before candidates enroll in
DSRT 930. In 930, candidates complete Chapter Four, which presents their doctoral dissertation
or project findings. While enrolled in DSRT 930, the dissertation is submitted to the graduate
school for a quality review. Once enrolled in DSRT 931, candidates complete Chapter Five. In
Chapter Five, candidates interpret their findings, discuss implications of those findings, present
recommendations for further study and action, and discuss how their study fills a gap in the
literature and contributes to the field of study. The doctoral research committee, and Graduate
8
School Quality Review representative will recommend the doctoral dissertation or project for
oral defense when it meets the Graduate School Guidelines. Candidates orally defend their
doctoral research while enrolled in DSRT 931-932, which is the final step in the doctoral
research process. After a successful defense, candidates submit a pdf of the approved dissertation
or project with the signature sheet to the academic department. At that time, the Program
Director recommends the candidates for graduation.
The DBA, EdD, and PhD programs are designed for dissertations or projects to be
completed in four courses. Candidates needing additional time may enroll in additional courses
providing the total time in the program does not exceed five years. Department chairs or Program
Directors must approve enrollment in courses beyond DSRT 931.
Doctoral Research Probation Process
To protect the doctoral research timeline, the following probation process is
proposed. This follows our academic probation process. A “missed deadline” occurs when a
student does not satisfactorily pass any dissertation course and is forced to repeat the course OR
when a student does not complete the dissertation or project in the prescribed timeline and begins
taking additional courses toward degree completion (DSRT 932).
1st missed deadline – Student is placed on academic probation.
2nd missed deadline – Student is removed from and prohibited from participating in CPT.
3rd missed deadline – Student is dismissed from the program.
Doctoral Research Style
Ultimately, the doctoral research will fall into one of the following broad outlines: a
quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods study. The seventh edition of the Publication Manual
9
of the American Psychological Association (APA) is the style manual to be used in writing the
doctoral research. Candidates should follow all APA guidelines.
Doctoral students may choose between writing a doctoral dissertation following a
quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods design, or developing a doctoral project following a
quantitative applied research design (see Appendix F, G, H). Whether a traditional dissertation
study or applied research project, both types of doctoral research are grounded in theory, related
to program goals, and have implications for practitioners. Candidates are encouraged to choose a
dissertation or project topic of personal relevance and significance as well as aligned with the
degree program of study.
The doctoral dissertation, a scholarly document, is written for professionals in the field.
The research questions at hand primarily determine the dissertation style. For instance, a student
may utilize an existing database to evaluate their hypotheses. Access to the database as originally
published is highly encouraged. Alternatively, they could build a novel testing or survey
instrument to gather data needed for their study. Another example may employ an in-depth
comparative case study.
Quantitative
Research
There are two options for the quantitative research: Traditional five chapter dissertation
or Applied Research Project.
Traditional Five Chapter Quantitative Dissertation
The traditional quantitative dissertation follows a five-chapter format and a deductive
approach. The required sections for the five chapters of the quantitative dissertation are located
in Appendix A. While there is no set number of pages, quantitative research typically includes
approximately 100 pages. This word requirement applies to the text of the dissertation only; it
10
does not cover the title page, acknowledgments, table of contents, or other non-content related
pages. The quantitative dissertation study will follow the conventions of an aligned quantitative
research design (see Appendix F).
Applied Research: Doctoral Project
Students who select the doctoral project will follow the Applied Research Option. This
design extends or applies research through the development of a doctoral project for the DBA,
EdD, and PhD programs. The applied research option, doctoral project, may include software or
application development, business model, or educational program. The doctoral applied research
project will present a new tool, model, or program as determined through the literature review of
existing items in the academic discipline using a systematic applied research approach.
Candidates complete the Applied Research during professional research courses (DSRT 736,
839, 930, 931), which are the last four courses taken during the program (See Appendix B).
There is no set number of pages due to the nature of the doctoral project, but a systematic applied
research approach must be used (see Appendix G).
Qualitative Dissertations
Unlike the quantitative dissertations, which follow a five-chapter format, the qualitative
dissertation is not bound by those requirements. Rather, the qualitative dissertation should be
approximately 45,000 words but must follow a systematic qualitative research approach (see
Appendix H). This word count requirement applies to the text of the dissertation only; it does not
cover the title page, acknowledgments, table of contents, or other non-content related pages.
Thus, with a small indulgence in tautology, the dissertation should be as long as it needs to be, as
long it meets the minimum word requirement (See Appendix C).
11
Mixed-Methods Dissertations
The program director must approve the mixed-methods dissertation methodology,
and the dissertation committee will provide guidance and expertise on the formatting
requirements for this type of dissertation (See Appendix C). Specific formatting guidelines for
the mixed methods dissertation study will be specified by the program director, dissertation
chair, and/or committee following a five chapter format.
Final Document
The final doctoral research document must be submitted while enrolled in the last
research course, typically DSRT 931. The candidates submit an error-free, print-ready copy final
doctoral research documents after the successful oral defense. The final doctoral research must
include all committee members, Graduate School Quality Control representative, and APA editor
recommended edits in the final pdf document. The copy is to be submitted electronically to the
academic program. If a candidate would like bound doctoral research copies, then he or she may
submit two printed copies (using white, 24 lb. résumé paper) of the doctoral research to the
academic program office before the designated semester deadline. After having those copies
bound, the UC Binding Department will return the two copies to the candidate. If the candidate
wishes to request more than two bound copies, he/she should submit the number desired. The
Binding Department will bill the student for the additional copies at a minimal cost per copy.
Doctoral Research Approval Process
Approval for conducting doctoral research should be obtained while enrolled in DSRT
839 and is a pre-requisite to piloting, developing a project, or gathering research. The
Institutional Review Board application to conduct research, and all supporting documents must
be submitted to the IRB chair. Students should self-register for the IRB and Research
12
Organization in iLearn for forms, tutorials, supporting materials, and links for IRB submission.
The doctoral research chair will review the document, and then the student should submit the
documents to the IRB chair following the links in the IRB and Research Organization.
Candidates will receive an IRB Approval Letter once the research has been approved. No
research is to be executed until IRB approval is granted, and all necessary consents (adults) and
assents (minors) are secured from participants. The IRB Approval Letter is to be placed in the
doctoral research as Appendix A.
Human Subjects Research: Participant Sampling and Recruitment
The dissertation manuscript must include a description of the study target population, and
a justification for the aligned sampling method to recruit human subjects that are representative
of the study target population is required. Therefore, it is also essential that procedures for the
recruitment of potential participants reflect inclusion/exclusion criteria, recruitment materials,
and any third-party recruitment services including paid services. To ensure ethical and quality
research, recruitment procedures must not include any procedures that can be inferred as
coercive, misleading, unduly influential, or involve dual relationships between the principal
investigator and potential participants. Recruitment may not occur within research settings where
the investigator’s personal network (family, friends, professional or other social relationships) or
any site where the investigator is employed or otherwise involved in supervisory relationships
with potential participants.
Site Authorization
A letter of site authorization, site permission, or letter of agreement is required from each
research setting where participant recruitment will be conducted. This includes the primary
organization that serves as the research setting. For example, if K12 principals from a particular
13
state are the target population and sampling will occur with the state principals’ association, a
site authorization letter is needed from the association. Site authorization may be provided via a
letter on the organization’s letterhead or by email with the authorizer’s role and organization
included.
Social Media and Internet Recruitment
Recruitment that involves social media or other internet sites or services must clearly
reflect the study target population. Internet recruitment that involves paid services to sample
participants must also meet the requirements for third-party paid recruitment services. A detailed
description is required for how the recruitment process will ensure that potential participants
reflect the target population. A site authorization email is required for social media recruitment
from closed groups (e.g., Facebook, LinkedIn, or others). If an open group is to be used, a
detailed description of the group is required. Recruitment from social media or other internet
accounts where the investigator holds dual relationships (including family, friends, social
relationships, and/or professional subordinates) may not be used for internet or social media
recruitment. Approval for social media or internet recruitment may be needed from the program
director.
Third-Party Paid Recruitment Services
Third-party paid recruitment services may be used on a case by case basis (e.g., survey
tools, internet mining services, self-testing tools, or others) for participant recruitment as this
form of recruitment is not appropriate for all types of research. Use of third-party recruitment
services may potentially impact the validity of research as the exact identity of participants is not
usually possible. The recruited sample through third-party paid recruitment may not be
representative of the actual target population for the specific doctoral research study. A detailed
14
description of the service, cost of the service, and recruitment procedure should be provided.
The detailed recruitment procedural description must also supply assurances that potential
participants recruited by the service will reflect the target population. This level of assurance will
require additional inclusion of specific qualifications and inclusion/exclusion criteria to be set up
with the third-party recruitment service. Approval for third-party paid recruitment may be
needed from the program director.
Publishing Guidelines
All doctoral research is subject to approval by UC’s institutional review board. The dissertation
chair guides the research throughout the doctoral research process. Students seeking publication of any
portions of the dissertation or publications based on work completed during the dissertation process
should obtain pre-approval from the dissertation chair and program director prior to submitting
research for publication. The names of the chair or committee members on any publication associated
with the dissertation are not permitted without permission and written consent.
Oral Defense
While enrolled in the final doctoral research course, candidates must present an oral
defense of their dissertation or project. This oral defense is presented after the committee chair,
and all committee members have given feedback, and all edits have been made to the doctoral
research. The academic department will schedule the defense session after the Graduate School
completes a Quality Review of the doctoral research (defense ready file). All three committee
members must be present for the oral defense. The oral defense session normally takes 45-60
minutes. The committee members and chair ask questions and offer comments. The committee
dismisses the candidate for committee deliberation. Once the committee and chair have
deliberated and reached a decision, the candidate is invited to re-join the group for the committee
decision. The committee makes one of the following decisions:
15
• approved with no revisions,
• approved with minor revisions,
• provisionally approved with major revisions, or
• not approved with the recommendation to write new doctoral research or repeat
the oral defense.
If one of the first two decisions is determined, the committee chair works with the
candidate to get the final document ready to send to the department chair for review. If the
committee decision requires major revisions or a new doctoral research, the candidate enrolls in
another research course to complete the revisions or rewrite. If the defense is to be repeated, the
candidate prepares with the committee for a new defense. The defense must be successfully
completed by the department defense deadline for the semester. The doctoral research chair and
committee evaluate the candidate using the department rubric (see Appendix E).
Graduation
Candidates should apply for graduation at the beginning of the semester in which they
plan to graduate. The application for graduation is located at
https://inside.ucumberlands.edu/academics/registrar/graduation_application.php. Once the
research has been successfully defended, and copies of the doctoral research are received by the
department chair, then the department chair notifies the registrar that the candidate has
completed all program requirements and is eligible to graduate. Commencement ceremonies are
held in May. Candidates are hooded during the commencement.
about:blank
16
Appendix A: Quantitative Dissertation (Traditional Five Chapter Format)
Title Page
Signature Page
Acknowledgments
Abstract
Table of Contents
List of Tables
Chapter One (Introduction) (DSRT 839)
Overview
Background and Problem Statement
Purpose of the Study
Significance of the Study
Research Questions
Theoretical Framework
Limitations of the Study
Assumptions
Definitions
Summary
Chapter Two (Review of Literature) (DSRT 736)
Introduction
Subsections based on a deductive approach
Summary
Chapter Three (Procedures and Methodology) (DSRT 839)
Introduction
Research Paradigm (quantitative)
Research Design
Sampling Procedures and or/
Data Collection Sources (reference Informed Consent and IRB approval
placed in Appendices)
17
Statistical Tests
Summary
Chapter Four (Research Findings) (DSRT 930)
Introduction
Participants and Research Setting
Analyses of Research Questions (one at a time)
Supplementary Findings (if any)
Summary
Chapter Five (Summary, Discussion, and Implications) (DSRT 931)
Introduction
Practical Assessment of Research Questions
Limitations of the Study
Implications for Future Study
Summary
References
Appendices (This section contains any tables, figures, and possible data sources that could not be placed in
the text of the paper due to its size, as well as copies of consent forms and IRB letters).
18
Appendix B: Doctoral Project (Quantitative: Applied Research Format)
Title Page
Signature Page
Acknowledgments
Abstract
Table of Contents
List of Tables
Chapter One (Introduction) (DSRT 839)
Overview
Background and Problem Statement
Purpose of the Project
Significance of the Project
Research Questions
Theoretical Framework
Limitations of the Project
Assumptions
Definitions
Summary
Chapter Two (Review of Literature) (DSRT 736)
Introduction
Subsections based on a deductive approach
Summary
Chapter Three (Procedures and Methodology) (DSRT 839)
Introduction
Research Paradigm (quantitative)
Research Project Design
Sampling Procedures and or/ Data Collection Sources (reference Informed Consent and IRB approval
placed in Appendices)
19
Statistical Tests (if applicable)
Summary
Chapter Four (Research Findings) (DSRT 930)
Introduction
Participants and Research Setting (if applicable)
Project Analysis
Analyses of Research Questions (one at a time)
Supplementary Findings (if any)
Summary
Chapter Five (Summary, Discussion, and Implications) (DSRT 931)
Introduction
Practical Assessment of Project Analysis
Limitations of the Study
Implications for Future Study
Summary
References
Appendices (This section contains any tables, figures and possible data sources that could not be placed in
the text of the paper due to its size, as well as copies of consent forms and IRB letters.)
20
Appendix C: Qualitative Dissertation Format
Title Page
Signature Page
Acknowledgments
Abstract
Table of Contents
List of Tables
Chapter One (Introduction) (DSRT 839)
Overview
Background and Problem Statement
Purpose of the Project
Significance of the Project
Research Questions
Theoretical Framework
Limitations of the Project
Assumptions
Definitions
Summary
Chapter Two (Review of Literature) (DSRT 736)
Introduction
Subsections based on a deductive approach
Summary
Chapter Three (Procedures and Methodology) (DSRT 839)
Introduction
Research Method and Paradigmatic Perspective
Qualitative Research Approach
Sampling Procedures and or/ Data Collection Sources (reference Informed Consent and IRB approval
placed in Appendices) – Interviews, Surveys/Questionnaires, Document Analysis, Focus Groups, Observations,
21
Data Analysis
Summary
Chapter Four (Research Findings) (DSRT 930)
Introduction
Participants and Research Setting (if applicable)
Project Analysis
Analyses of Research Questions (one at a time)
Supplementary Findings (if any)
Summary
Chapter Five (Summary, Discussion, and Implications) (DSRT 931)
Introduction
Practical Assessment of Project Analysis
Limitations of the Study
Implications for Future Study
Summary
References
Appendices (This section contains any tables, figures and possible data sources that could not be placed in
the text of the paper due to its size, as well as copies of consent forms and IRB letters.)
22
Appendix D: Qualitative (Historical) and Mixed Methods Dissertation Information
Title Page
Signature Page
Acknowledgments
Abstract
Table of Contents
Chapter One (DSRT 736)
Additional Chapters (DSRT 839, 930, 931)
References
Appendices
*Specific formatting guidelines will be specified by program director, dissertation chair,
and committee.
23
Appendix E: Doctoral Research Evaluation Rubric
Criterion 4 (Expert) 3 (Proficient) 2 (Fair) 1 (Poor)
I.
Critical and
reflective thinking
capable of
facilitating
institutional,
informational
technology, or
business related
problem-solving or
school/ college
improvement.
Critically analyzed the
topic.
Discussion of the
topic was extensive and
anchored in fact and
reason. Information
about significant
aspects of the topic
were
analyzed from the
perspective of key
related concepts.
Meaning of the analysis
was summarized.
Critically analyzed
the topic.
Discussion of the
topic was anchored
in fact and reason.
Information about
significant aspects
of the topic were
analyzed from the
perspective of key
related concepts.
Either the analysis
or summary lacked
some level of detail.
Somewhat critically
analyzed the topic.
Discussion of the topic
was minimally
anchored in fact and
reason. Information
about significant
aspects of the topic
were somewhat
analyzed from the
perspective of key
related concepts.
Analysis and summary
included but lacks a
significant level of
analysis and discussion.
Minimally
discussed the topic
without supporting
facts and reasons.
Poor organization of
the information and
limited level of
detail.
II.
Consideration for
the impact of
leadership,
information
technology, or
business on
institutional
constituents.
Demonstrates an
extensive understanding
of the topic’s
relationship to
leadership, information
technology, or
business.
Demonstrates a
good understanding
of the topic’s
relationship to
leadership,
information
technology, or
business.
Demonstrates a fair
understanding of the
topic’s relationship to
leadership, information
technology, or business.
Demonstrates a
minimal
understanding of the
topic’s relationship
to leadership,
information
technology, or
business.
III. Effective
analytical and
communication
skills.
Demonstrates a
professional level of
skills
associated with
formatting, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
use of
numbers.
Demonstrates
acceptable skills
associated with
formatting,
grammar, spelling,
syntax, and use of
numbers.
Needs minor
improvement in skills
associated with
formatting, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
use of numbers.
Needs significant
improvement in
skills associated
formatting,
grammar, spelling,
syntax, and use of
numbers.
IV. Knowledge of
genres, paradigms,
theories or trends in
business, criminal
justice, education,
English, health
sciences, history,
information
technology, math,
nursing,
psychology,
religion, or student
personnel services.
Subject is identified,
realistic, and grounded
in
a
recognized genre,
paradigm, theory, or
trend.
Subject is identified
and is realistic, but
it lacks grounding in
a recognized genre,
paradigm, theory, or
trend.
Subject is identified but
is not realistic or
grounded in a
recognized genre,
paradigm, theory, or
trend.
Subject area is not
established.
V. Required
Components of
Dissertation based
on the Doctoral
Research
Handbook.
All
required
components are
included for this portion
of the
dissertation based
on
the outline and
requirements in the
Doctoral Research
handbook.
Minor information
is missing from the
required
components for this
portion of the
dissertation based
on the outline and
requirements in the
Doctoral Research
handbook.
Significant information
is missing from the
required
components
for this portion of the
dissertation based on
the outline and
requirements in the
Doctoral Research
handbook.
This portion of the
dissertation lacks
the detail needed to
meet the
requirements for the
components
outlined in the
Doctoral Research
handbook.
24
Updated 3/242022
Implemented: Summer 2022
Appendix F: Quantitative Research Design
25
Appendix G: Applied Research Design
26
Appendix H: Qualitative Research Design
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
