read chapter 5&6 that is attached to complete assignment .
must be at least 400 words. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 3 scholarly
citations in APA format.
Think about two environments you have experienced.
- The first environment is one that did not confront the brutal facts, where the people (and the truth) were not heard.
- The second environment is one that did confront the brutal facts, where people had a tremendous opportunity to be heard.
What accounts for the difference between the two environments? If you do not have this life experience you are not off the hook—you will need to interview a leader who has these experiences and report on that. What does the contrast teach us about how to construct an environment where the truth is heard? Using strong Biblical support, explain how you relate this to your Christian Worldview. Does your Christian Worldview help you develop this environment? How does this relate to the ethical components of Meese & Ortmeier: Leadership, Ethics, and Policing: Challenges for the 21st Century?
Think about two environments you have experienced.
1. The first environment is one that did not confront the brutal facts, where the people (and the truth) were not heard.
2. The second environment is one that did confront the brutal facts, where people had a tremendous opportunity to be heard.
What accounts for the difference between the two environments? If you do not have this life experience, you are not off the hook—you will need to interview a leader who has these experiences and report on that. What does the contrast teach us about how to construct an environment where the truth is heard? Using strong Biblical support, explain how you relate this to your Christian Worldview. Does your Christian Worldview help you develop this environment? How does this relate to the ethical components of
Meese & Ortmeier: Leadership, Ethics, and Policing: Challenges for the 21st Century?
Criteria Ratings Points
Thread:
Content
Mastery
7 to >5.
0 pts
Advanced
All posts display clear content mastery
and relate precisely to the assigned
topic.
5 to >3.0 pts
Proficient
All posts are related to
the assigned topic, but
do not provide
evidence of subject
mastery.
3 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Posts are loosely
related to the
assigned topic,
and do not
effectively
contribute to the
development of
the discussion.
Posts display a
minimal or
superficial
understanding of
the topic.
0 pts
Not
Present
7 pts
Thread:
Clarity &
Support
7 to >5.0 pts
Advanced
Posts are balanced in their approach to
the topic, but provide evidence of a
clear, well-researched position on the
topic.
5 to >3.0 pts
Proficient
Posts are mostly
balanced, but do not
provide evidence of a
firm position derived
from research or
current literature.
3 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Posts show a
clear bias, or do
not provide a
discernable
position on the
issue. Evidence of
research is not
present.
0 pts
Not
Present
7 pts
Replies:
Content
14 to >12.0 pts
Advanced
Unique contributions are made to the
discussion in the two responses.
12 to >10.0 pts
Proficient
Contributions are
made through two
responses but they are
simply definitional in
nature.
10 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Missing a reply
and/or initial
contributions
made are very
minimal and only
derivative in
nature.
0 pts
Not
Present
14 pts
Discussion Grading Rubric | CJUS610_B01_202320
Criteria Ratings Points
Spelling,
Grammar,
& APA
Format
12 to >10.0 pts
Advanced
Correct spelling and grammar, APA are
used throughout essay. Thread and
replies contain fewer than 2 errors in
grammar, spelling and/or APA that
distract the reader from the content.
Minimum word count of 400 words for
the initial thread is met or exceeded.
Initial post includes one unique, relevant
scholarly reference and one scriptural
reference. Minimum word count of 250
words for each response is met or
exceeded. Replies include one unique,
relevant scholarly reference and one
scriptural reference.
10 to >8.0 pts
Proficient
Thread and Replies
contain fewer than 5
errors in grammar,
spelling and/or APA
that distract the reader
from the content.
Minimum word count
for each post/reply is
within 10% of the
requirement.
References to outside
sources are included,
but do not provide
unique insight to the
overall discussion.
8 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Thread and
Replies contain
fewer than 8
errors in grammar,
spelling, and/or
APA that distract
the reader from
the content.
Minimum word
count for each
post/reply is within
20% of the
requirement.
Sources
referenced are not
scholarly or
relevant.
0 pts
Not
Present
12 pts
Total Points: 40
Discussion Grading Rubric | CJUS610_B01_202320
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
