Excerpts from The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli
A Prince’s Duty Concerning Military Matters
A prince, therefore, must not have any other object nor any other thought, nor
must he take anything as his profession but war, its institutions, and its discipline;
because that is the only profession which befits one who commands; and it is of
such importance that not only does it maintain those who were born princes, but
many times it enables men of private station to rise to that position; and, on the
other hand, it is evident that when princes have given more thought to personal
luxuries than to arms, they have lost their state. And the first way to lose it is to
neglect this art; and the way to acquire it is to be well versed in this art.
Francesco Sforza1 became Duke of Milan from being a private citizen because he
was armed; his sons, since they avoided the inconveniences of arms, became
private citizens after having been dukes. For, among the other bad effects it
causes, being disarmed makes you despised; this is one of those infamies a prince
should guard himself against, as will be treated below: for between an armed and
an unarmed man there is no comparison whatsoever, and it is not reasonable for
an armed man to obey an unarmed man willingly, nor that an unarmed man should
be safe among armed servants; since, when the former is suspicious and the latter
are contemptuous, it is impossible for them to work well together. And therefore,
a prince who does not understand military matters, besides the other misfortunes
already noted, cannot be esteemed by his own soldiers, nor can he trust them.
He must, therefore, never raise his thought from this exercise of war, and in
peacetime he must train himself more than in time of war; this can be done in two
ways: one by action, the other by the mind. And as far as actions are concerned,
besides keeping his soldiers well disciplined and trained, he must always be out
hunting, and must accustom his body to hardships in this manner; and he must
also learn the nature of the terrain, and know how mountains slope, how valleys
open, how plains lie, and understand the nature of rivers and swamps; and he
should devote much attention to such activities. Such knowledge is useful in two
ways: first, one learns to know one’s own country and can better understand how
to defend it; second, with the knowledge and experience of the terrain, one can
easily comprehend the characteristics of any other terrain that it is necessary to
explore for the first time; for the hills, valleys, plains, rivers, and swamps of
Tuscany for instance, have certain similarities to those of other provinces; so that
by knowing the lay of the land in one province one can easily understand it in
others. And a prince who lacks this ability lacks the most important quality in
aleader; because this skill teaches you to find the enemy, choose a campsite, lead
troops, organize them for battle, and besiege towns to your own advantage.
Philopoemon, Prince of the Achaeans among the other praises given to him by
writers, is praised because in peacetime he thought of nothing except the means
of waging war; and when he was out in the country with his friends, he often
stopped and reasoned with them: “If the enemy were on that hilltop and we were
here with our army, which of the two of us would have the advantage? How could
we attack them without breaking formation? If we wanted to retreat, how could
we do this? If they were to retreat, how could we pursue them?” And he proposed
to them, as they rode along, all the contingencies that can occur in an army; he
heard their opinions, expressed his own, and backed it up with arguments; so that,
because of these continuous deliberations, when leading his troops no unforeseen
incident could arise for which he did not have the remedy.
But as for the exercise of the mind, the prince must read histories and in them
study the deeds of great men; he must see how they conducted themselves in
wars; he must examine the reasons for their victories and for their defeats in order
to avoid the latter and to imitate the former; and above all else he must do as
some distinguished man before him has done, who elected to imitate someone
who had been praised and honored before him, and always keep in mind his deeds
and actions; just as it is reported that Alexander the Great imitated Achilles;
Caesar, Alexander; Scipio, Cyrus. And anyone who reads the life of Cyrus written by
Xenophon then realizes how important in the life of Scipio that imitation was to his
glory and how much, in purity, goodness, humanity, and generosity, Scipio
conformed to those characteristics of Cyrus that Xenophon had written about.
Such methods as these a wise prince must follow, and never in peaceful times
must he be idle; but he must turn them diligently to his advantage in order to be
able to profit from them in times of adversity, so that, when Fortune changes, she
will find him prepared to withstand such times.
.On Cruelty and Mercy and Whether It Is Better to Be Loved than to Be Feared or
the Contrary
Proceeding to the other qualities mentioned above, I say that every prince must
desire to be considered merciful and not cruel; nevertheless, he must take care not
to misuse this mercy. Cesare Borgia was considered cruel; nonetheless, his cruelty
had brought order to Romagna, united it, restored it to peace and obedience. If we
examine this carefully, we shall see that he was more merciful than the Florentine
people, who, in order to avoid being considered cruel, allowed the destruction of
Pistoia. Therefore, a prince must not worry about the reproach of cruelty when it is
a matter of keeping his subjects united and loyal; for with a very few examples of
cruelty he will be more compassionate than those who, out of excessive mercy,
permit disorders to continue, from which arise murders and plundering; for these
usually harm the community at large, while the executions that come from the
prince harm one individual in particular. And the new prince, above all other
princes, cannot escape the reputation of being called cruel, since new states are
full of dangers. And Virgil, through Dido, states: “My difficult condition and the
newness of my rule make me act in such a manner, and to set guards over my land
on all sides.”
Nevertheless, a prince must be cautious in believing and in acting, nor should he be
afraid of his own shadow; and he should proceed in such a manner, tempered by
Excerpts from The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli
prudence and humanity, so that too much trust may not render him imprudent nor
too much distrust render him intolerable.
From this arises an argument: whether it is better to be loved than to be feared, or
the contrary. I reply that one should like to be both one and the other; but since it
is difficult to join them together, it is much safer to be feared than to be loved
when one of the two must be lacking. For one can generally say this about men:
that they are ungrateful, fickle, simulators and deceivers, avoiders of danger,
greedy for gain; and while you work for their good they are completely yours,
offering you their blood, their property, their lives, and their sons, as I said earlier,
when danger is far away; but when it comes nearer to you they turn away. And
that prince who bases his power entirely on their words, finding himself stripped of
other preparations, comes to ruin; for friendships that are acquired by a price and
not by greatness and nobility of character are purchased but are not owned, and at
the proper moment they cannot be spent. And men are less hesitant about
harming someone who makes himself loved than one who makes himself feared
because love is held together by a chain of obligation which, since men are a sorry
lot, is broken on every occasion in which their own self-interest is concerned; but
fear is held together by a dread of punishment which will never abandon you.
A prince must nevertheless make himself feared in such a manner that he will
avoid hatred, even if he does not acquire love; since to be feared and not to be
hated can very well be combined; and this will always be so when he keeps his
hands off the property and the women of his citizens and his subjects. And if he
must take someone’s life, he should do so when there is proper justification and
manifest cause; but, above all, he should avoid the property of others; for men
forget more quickly the death of their father than the loss of their patrimony.
Moreover, the reasons for seizing their property are never lacking; and he who
begins to live by stealing always finds a reason for taking what belongs to others;
on the contrary, reasons for taking a life are rarer and disappear sooner.
But when the prince is with his armies and has under his command a multitude of
troops, then it is absolutely necessary that he not worry about being considered
cruel; for without that reputation he will never keep an army united or prepared
for any combat. Among the praiseworthy deeds of Hannibal is counted this: that,
having a very large army, made up of all kinds of men, which he commanded in
foreign lands, there never arose the slightest dissention, neither among
themselves nor against their prince, both during his good and his bad fortune. This
could not have arisen from anything other than his inhuman cruelty, which, along
with his many other abilities, made him always respected and terrifying in the eyes
of his soldiers; and without that, to attain the same effect, his other abilities would
not have sufficed. And the writers of history, having considered this matter very
little, on the one hand admire these deeds of his and on the other condemn the
main cause of them.
And that it be true that his other abilities would not have been sufficient can be
seen from the example of Scipio, a most extraordinary man not only in his time but
in all recorded history, whose armies in Spain rebelled against him; this came about
from nothing other than his excessive compassion, which gave to his soldiers more
liberty than military discipline allowed. For this he was censured in the senate by
Fabius Maximus, who called him the corruptor of the Roman militia. The Locrians,
having been ruined by one of Scipio’s officers, were not avenged by him, nor was
the arrogance of that officer corrected, all because of his tolerant nature; so that
someone in the senate who tried to apologize for him said that there were many
men who knew how not to err better than they knew how to correct errors. Such a
nature would have, in time, damaged Scipio’s fame and glory if he had maintained
it during the empire; but, living under the control of the senate, this harmful
characteristic of his not only concealed itself but brought him fame.
I conclude, therefore, returning to the problem of being feared and loved, that
since men love at their own pleasure and fear at the pleasure of the prince, a wise
prince should build his foundation upon that which belongs to him, not upon that
which belongs to others: he must strive only to avoid hatred, as has been said.
How a Prince Should Keep His Word
How praiseworthy it is for a prince to keep his word and to live by integrity and not
by deceit everyone knows; nevertheless, one sees from the experience of our
times that the princes who have accomplished great deeds are those who have
cared little for keeping their promises and who have known how to manipulate the
minds of men by shrewdness; and in the end they have surpassed those who laid
their foundations upon honesty.
You must, therefore, know that there are two means of fighting: one according to
the laws, the other with force; the first way is proper to man, the second to beasts;
but because the first, in many cases, is not sufficient, it becomes necessary to have
recourse to the second. Therefore, a prince must know how to use wisely that the
prince, as was noted above, should think about avoiding those things which make
him hated and despised; and when he has avoided this, he will have carried out his
duties and will find no danger whatsoever in other vices. As I have said, what
makes him hated above all else is being rapacious and a usurper of the property
and the women of his subjects; he must refrain from this; and in most cases, so
long as you do not deprive them of either their property or their honor, the
majority of men live happily; and you have only to deal with the ambition of a few,
who can be restrained without difficulty and by many means. What makes him
despised is being considered changeable, frivolous, effeminate, cowardly,
irresolute; from these qualities a prince must guard himself as if from a reef, and
he must strive to make everyone recognize in his actions greatness, spirit, dignity,
and strength; and concerning the private affairs of his subjects, he must insist that
his decision be irrevocable; and he should maintain himself in such a way that no
man could imagine that he can deceive or cheat him.
Excerpts from The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli
That prince who projects such an opinion of himself is greatly esteemed; and it is
difficult to conspire against a man with such a reputation and difficult to attack
him, provided that he is understood to be of great merit and revered by his
subjects. For a prince must have two fears: one, internal, concerning his subjects;
the other, external, concerning foreign powers. From the latter he can defend
himself by his good troops and friends; and he will always have good friends if he
has good troops; and internal affairs will always be stable when external affairs are
stable, provided that they are not already disturbed by a conspiracy; and even if
external conditions change, if he is properly organized and lives as I have said and
does not lose control of himself, he will always be able to withstand every attack,
just as I said that Nabis the Spart did. But concerning his subjects, when external
affairs do not change, he has to fear that they may conspire secretly: the prince
secures himself from this by avoiding being hated or despised and by keeping the
people satisfied with him; this is a necessary matter, as was treated above at
length. And one of the most powerful remedies a prince has against conspiracies is
not to be hated by the masses; for a man who plans a conspiracy always believes
that he will satisfy the people by killing the prince; but when he thinks he might
anger them, he cannot work up the courage to undertake such a deed; for the
problems on the side of the conspirators are countless experience demonstrates
that conspiracies have been many but few have been concluded successfully; for
anyone who conspires cannot be alone, nor can he find companions except from
amongst those whom he believes to be dissatisfied; and as soon as you have
uncovered your intent to one dissatisfied man, you give him the means to make
himself happy, since he can have everything he desires by uncovering the plot; so
much is this so that, seeing a sure gain on the one hand and one doubtful and full
of danger on the other, if he is to maintain faith with you he has to be either an
unusually good friend or a completely determined enemy of the prince. And to
treat the matter briefly, I say that on the part of the conspirator there is nothing
but fear, jealousy, and the thought of punishment that terrifies him; but on the
part of the prince there is the majesty of the principality, the laws, the defenses of
friends and the state to protect him; so that, with the good will of the people
added to all these things, it is impossible for anyone to be so rash as to plot against
him. For, where usually a conspirator has to be afraid before he executes his evil
deed, in this case he must be afraid, having the people as an enemy, even after the
crime is performed, nor can he hope to find any refuge because of this.
One could cite countless examples on this subject; but I want to satisfy myself with
only one which occurred during the time of our fathers. Messer Annibale
Bentivoglio, prince of Bologna and grandfather of the present Messer Annibale,
was murdered by the Canneschi family, who conspired against him; he left behind
no heir except Messer Giovanni, then only a baby. As soon as this murder
occurred, the people rose up and killed all the Canneschi. This came about because
of the good will that the house of the Bentivoglio enjoyed in those days; this good
will was so great that with Annibale dead, and there being no one of that family
left in the city who could rule Bologna, the Bolognese people, having heard that in
Florence there was one of the Bentivoglio blood who was believed until that time
to be the son of a blacksmith, went to Florence to find him, and they gave him the
control of that city; it was ruled by him until Messer Giovanni became of age to
rule.
I conclude, therefore, that a prince must be little concerned with conspiracies
when the people are well disposed toward him; but when the populace is hostile
and regards him with hatred, he must fear everything and everyone. And well-
organized states and wise princes have, with great diligence, taken care not to
anger the nobles and to satisfy the common people and keep them contented; for
this is one of the most important concerns that a prince has.
On Those Things for Which Men, and Particularly Princes, Are Praised or Blamed
Now there remains to be examined what should be the methods and procedures
of a prince in dealing with his subjects and friends. And because I know that many
have written about this, I am afraid that by writing about it again I shall be thought
of as presumptuous, since in discussing this material I depart radically from the
procedures of others. But since my intention is to write something useful for
anyone who understands it, it seemed more suitable to me to search after the
effectual truth of the matter rather than its imagined one. And many writers have
imagined for themselves republics and principalities that have never been seen nor
known to exist in reality; for there is such a gap between how one lives and how
one ought to live that anyone who abandons what is done for what ought to be
done learns his ruin rather than his preservation: for a man who wishes to make a
vocation of being good at all times will come to ruin among so many who are not
good. Hence it is necessary for a prince who wishes to maintain his position to
learn how not to be good, and to use this knowledge or not to use it according to
necessity.
Leaving aside, therefore, the imagined things concerning a prince, and taking into
account those that are true, I say that all men, when they are spoken of, and
particularly princes, since they are placed on a higher level, are judged by some of
these qualities which bring them either blame or praise. And this is why one is
considered generous, another miserly (to use a Tuscan word, since “avaricious” in
our language is still used to mean one who wishes to acquire by means of theft; we
call “miserly” one who excessively avoids using what he has); one is considered a
giver, the other rapacious; one cruel, another merciful; one treacherous, another
faithful; one effeminate and cowardly, another bold and courageous; one humane,
another haughty; one lascivious, another chaste; one trustworthy, another
cunning; one harsh, another lenient; one serious, another frivolous; one religious,
another unbelieving; and the like. And I know that everyone will admit that it
would be a very praiseworthy thing to find in a prince, of the qualities mentioned
above, those that are held to be good, but since it is neither possible to have them
Excerpts from The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli
nor to observe them all completely, because human nature does not permit it, a
prince must be prudent enough to know how to escape the bad reputation of
those vices that would lose the state for him, and must protect himself from those
that will not lose it for him, if this is possible; but if he cannot, he need not concern
himself unduly if he ignores these less serious vices. And, moreover, he need not
worry about incurring the bad reputation of those vices without which it would be
difficult to hold his state; since, carefully taking everything into account, one will
discover that something which appears to be a virtue, if pursued, will end in his
destruction; while some other thing which seems to be a vice, if pursued, will result
in his safety and his well-being
On Generosity and Miserliness
Beginning, therefore, with the first of the above-mentioned qualities, I say that it
would be good to be considered generous; nevertheless, generosity used in such a
manner as to give you a reputation for it will harm you; because if it is employed
virtuously and as one should employ it, it will not be recognized and you will not
avoid the reproach of its opposite. And so, if a prince wants to maintain his
reputation for generosity among men, it is necessary for him not to neglect any
possible means of lavish display; in so doing such a prince will always use up all his
resources and he will be obliged, eventually, if he wishes to maintain his reputation
for generosity, to burden the people with excessive taxes and to do everything
possible to raise funds. This will begin to make him hateful to his sub-jects, and,
becoming impoverished, he will not be much esteemed by anyone; so that, as a
consequence of his generosity, having offended many and rewarded few, he will
feel the effects of any slight unrest and will be ruined at the first sign of danger;
recognizing this and wishing to alter his policies, he immediately runs the risk of
being reproached as a miser.
A prince, therefore, unable to use this virtue of generosity in a manner which will
not harm himself if he is known for it, should, if he is wise, not worry about being
called a miser; for with time he will come to be considered more generous once it
is evident that, as a result of his parsimony, his income is sufficient, he can defend
himself from anyone who makes war against him, and he can undertake
enterprises without overburdening his people, so that he comes to be generous
with all those from whom he takes nothing, who are countless, and miserly with all
those to whom he gives nothing, who are few. In our times we have not seen great
deeds accomplished except by those who were considered miserly; all others were
done away with. Pope Julius II, although he made use of his reputation for
generosity in order to gain the papacy, then decided not to maintain it in order to
be able to wage war; the present King of France has waged many wars without
imposing extra taxes on his subjects, only because his habitual parsimony has
provided for the additional expenditures; the present King of Spain, if he had been
considered generous, would not have engaged in nor won so many campaigns.
Therefore, in order not to have to rob his subjects, to be able to defend himself,
not to become poor and contemptible, and not to be forced to become rapacious,
a prince must consider it of little importance if he incurs the name of miser, for this
is one of those vices that permits him to rule. And if someone were to say: Caesar
with his generosity came to rule the empire, and many others, because they were
generous and known to be so, achieved very high positions; I reply: you are either
already a prince or you are on the way to becoming one; in the first instance such
generosity is damaging; in the second it is very necessary to be thought generous.
And Caesar was one of those who wanted to gain the principality of Rome; but if,
after obtaining this, he had lived and had not moderated his expenditures, he
would have destroyed that empire. And if someone were to reply: there have
existed many princes who have accomplished great deeds with their armies who
have been reputed to be generous; I answer you: a prince either spends his own
money and that of his subjects or that of others; in the first case he must be eco-
nomical; in the second he must not restrain any part of his generosity. And for that
prince who goes out with his soldiers and lives by looting, sacking, and ransoms,
who controls the property of others, such generosity is necessary; otherwise he
would not be followed by his troops. And with what does not belong to you or to
your subjects you can be a more liberal giver, as were Cyrus, Caesar, and
Alexander; for spending the wealth of others does not lessen your reputation but
adds to it; only the spending of your own is what harms you. And there is nothing
that uses itself up faster than generosity, for as you employ it you lose the means
of employing it, and you become either poor or despised or, in order to escape
poverty, rapacious and hated. And above all other things a prince must guard
himself against being despised and hated; and generosity leads you to both one
and the other. So it is wiser to live with the reputation of a miser, which produces
reproach without hatred, than to be forced to incur the reputation of rapacity,
which produces reproach along with hatred, because you want to be considered as
generous
Perhaps the chief ethical issue raised by
The Qualities of a Prince is the question of whether the desired ends justify the means used to achieve them.
· Write a 3 -4 page essay in which you take a stand on this question. Begin by defining the issue. What does the concept “the end justifies the means” actually mean? What difficulties may arise when unworthy means are used to achieve worthy ends?
Use
the excerpt chapters from The Prince, “The Deep Democratic Tradition in America, as well as historical or personal examples in order to help synthesize and analyze your argument. You will have 3 referenced sources with in text citations and a Works Cited page.
· Your essay should be in MLA 9 format (one inch margins, 12 point font, double spaced). Develop your ideas completely. Use 1 – 2 referenced sources.
· You must also include a completed Essay Planning Sheet
Essay Planning Sheet
General Topic:
Your thesis statement:
Body Paragraph one:
Topic Sentence
Main Point 1
Main Point 2
Main Point 3
Did I add detail to support each main point? Y/N
Body Paragraph two:
Topic Sentence
Main Point 1
Main Point 2
Main Point 3
Did I add detail to support each main point? Y/N
Body Paragraph three:
Topic Sentence
Main Point 1
Main Point 2
Main Point 3
Did I add detail to support each main point? Y/N
Conclusion Paragraph:
Did I reference the introduction (mirror)? Y/N:
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
