Share one or two journal articles and websites pertinent to evidence-based practice. Discuss how you would move towards evidence-based practice in your workplace. If you are not currently employed, feel free to use a prior place of employment for an example.
Evidence Based Practice
Share one or two journal articles and websites pertinent to evidence-based practice. Discuss how you would move towards evidence-based practice in your workplace. If you are not currently employed, feel free to use a prior place of employment for an example.
Revised 7/1/2022
Discussion Rubric
CRITERIA Excellent (20) Good (13-19) Fair (8-13) Poor (1-7) Not Demonstrated (0)
Content/
Comprehension
-Critical
thinking
-Evidence
-Construction
*Addresses discussion
question completely
*Demonstrates
understanding of course
content and synthesis of
concepts *Offers clear
point of view and details
to
support evidence
*Discussion question is
not completely
addressed but post
shows understanding
of course content
* Point of view is
somewhat unclear
*Detail is appropriate,
but limited
* Discussion question is
addressed but post
does not demonstrate
depth of
understanding of
course content *Point
of view is unclear
*Detail is
underdeveloped or not
appropriate for post
* Discussion question
is minimally addressed
*Detail supporting
evidence or point of
view is missing
* Both the initial
post and all peer
responses are
missing
Engagement/
Classroom
Interaction
-Initial post
-Peer
responses
* Submits at least 2 peer
responses
*Initial post is 2-3
paragraphs in length
*Extends discussion
thread by providing an
evaluation of viewpoints,
relating to other’s ideas
and/or offering new ideas
and supporting detail
*Uses scholarly reference
sources beyond course
materials. At least one
scholarly reference is
listed for the initial post
*Submits at least 2
peer responses *Initial
post is 2
paragraphs in length
One of the following
has occurred:
*Peer responses are
limited and do not
extend the discussion
thread
*Only course material
used as reference
sources
*One of the following
has occurred:
*Initial post is 1
paragraph in length
*Missing 1 peer
response
*Ideas offered in peer
responses lack depth
*No references are
cited
*One of the following
has occurred:
*Missing the initial
post
*Missing 2 peer
responses
* Both the initial
post and all peer
responses are
missing
Mechanics
-Spelling
-Grammar
-APA
*Writing is coherent,
organized and easy to
follow.
*No spelling, APA or
grammatical errors
*Scholarly references
used from a wide range of
sources and are ≤ five
years old
*Writing is mostly easy
to follow with clear
writing
* No more than 1
spelling, grammatical or
APA error
*Writing has some
parts that are unclear
*2-3 spelling or
grammatical errors
present
*2-3 APA errors
present * Only
course materials
used for scholarly
references
*Post is poorly
organized and hard to
read; does not flow
logically
*≥ 3 spelling or
grammatical errors
*≥ 3 APA errors
*Some references not
cited OR all references
≥ 5 years old
* Both the initial
post and all peer
responses are
missing
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
