homework help

help on evaluation which follows the implementation 

Running head: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1

Assessment 4:Implementation Plan Design

Health Promotion and Awareness

Name

course

Professor

Date

Implementation Plan for Health Living Awareness Intervention

Introduction

This implementation plan aims to reduce the prevalence of chronic diseases in the healthcare system and enhance the quality of life for the intended population through increased awareness of healthy lifestyle choices. In-depth knowledge of the problem statement, intended audience, and context, as well as the intervention strategy to meet that need, have been gleaned from the prior evaluations. This implementation plan aims to guarantee that the health living awareness intervention is carried out in a manner that does not overburden the healthcare facility’s resources or violate applicable policies or regulations while still achieving the quality improvement outcomes intended for the population being served.

Part 1: Management and Leadership

In healthcare settings, strong management and leadership are crucial to the success of any intervention plan. A well-defined plan for leading, monitoring, and enforcing professional nursing practices is essential for facilitating interprofessional collaboration during the intervention plan’s implementation (Votova et al., 2019). Establishing a project steering committee is one option to think about. It is proposed that a committee be formed to ensure that the intervention plan is carried out as planned and that all relevant parties cooperate efficiently. Nursing, medical, and administrative professionals might all be included in the steering group to provide input from different angles during the implementation phase.

Establishing distinct functions and duties for each stakeholder is another tactic to think about. As a result, everyone involved in the implementation process would clearly understand their responsibilities. The potential for confusion or duplication of effort during implementation could also be reduced with clear roles and responsibilities. Implementation success depends on clear and consistent communication. To that end, it would be beneficial to establish open forums for discussing obstacles and possible solutions and a system for providing regular reports on progress. This would be useful for keeping everyone updated and involved during the implementation process, gathering real-time input, and making necessary adjustments. Promoting interprofessional collaboration also benefits from providing stakeholders with chances for continuing training and education. Depending on the nature of the intervention being carried out, this may involve teaching healthcare workers how to work together effectively. In addition to fostering a culture of collaboration and teamwork, this training would build a shared knowledge of the intervention’s goals and objectives.

However, it is essential to consider alternatives to the offered solutions for enhancing care quality and patient satisfaction while keeping costs low. Preparing for the difficulties that may develop while introducing a new intervention plan is essential. Staff employees accustomed to a specific method of doing things could be resistant to change, for instance (Votova et al., 2019). Staff participation in the planning and implementation process and providing sufficient support and resources will go a long way toward mitigating the effects of this change.

Additionally, expenses may be increased due to changes in how care is delivered because of the need to purchase new resources and technologies. However, these adjustments should increase productivity in the long run while decreasing expenses (Votova et al., 2019). Allocating resources in a way that considers the intervention plan’s long-term advantages is crucial.

Part 2: Delivery and Technology

Several communication channels will be employed to reach the intended audience and implement the intervention strategy. A few examples of these modes of distribution are:

Online educational modules: to educate and train healthcare professionals, an online learning management system (LMS) will be utilized to deliver a series of self-contained modules (Orton et al., 2018). As a result, everyone involved in the patient’s care can access the same data whenever it is most convenient for them.

Workshops: providers in the healthcare industry will receive hands-on instruction in implementing the intervention plan through a series of workshops. Seasoned medical professionals will teach these classes right there at the clinic.

Onsite Coaching and Mentoring: Successful execution of the intervention strategy is dependent on on-site coaching and mentoring for healthcare personnel (Orton et al., 2018). To achieve this goal, we will set aside time for a coach or mentor to work with the healthcare team.

Evaluations of Technological Options

Telemedicine: Telemedicine can significantly enhance the provision of healthcare services and can disseminate instructional and training resources to healthcare professionals. Time and distance are two factors that can prevent people from receiving medical care, but telemedicine is helping to eliminate these obstacles.

Health information technology: Technology in the medical field that stores and transmits data about patients and their conditions are known as health information technology (HIT). HIT can be used to keep tabs on how well an intervention plan is being carried out and to give immediate responses to doctors (Orton et al., 2018). By making pertinent data accessible at crucial moments, HIT can be used to boost care quality.

Electronic health records (EHRs): to guarantee that all healthcare practitioners have access to the same information, electronic health records (EHRs) can be utilized to enhance the delivery of healthcare services (Orton et al., 2018). Electronic health records (EHRs) can be used to monitor the development of the intervention strategy and offer immediate responses to healthcare professionals.

Part 3: Stakeholders, Policy, and Regulations

Previous evaluations focused on creating an intervention strategy and health education program for an identified group: the growing number of seniors who are overweight and developing type 2 diabetes. The intervention hopes to boost this population’s overall health and well-being by encouraging regular exercise, nutritious food, and medication compliance. However, the intervention plan’s viability hinges on a thorough examination of the stakeholders, regulatory consequences, and potential support that could affect its actual execution (Magwood et al., 2022). This section discusses the people involved, the legal ramifications, and the possible backing that will affect how the intervention plan is carried out. We’ll also recommend some policy considerations to help make the plan a reality.

Stakeholders

Providers, patients, and family members, as well as community and healthcare groups, will all play roles in carrying out the intervention plan. When it comes to carrying out the intervention strategy, healthcare professionals like doctors and nurses will play a vital role in helping patients along the way by offering advice, information, and encouragement (Magwood et al., 2022). The patient and their family must take personal responsibility for altering their way of life per the guidelines while taking prescribed medications. By providing patients and their families with resources and assistance, community and healthcare groups will play an essential role in carrying out the intervention plan (Masefield et al., 2021).

Regulatory Implications

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and Affordable Care Act (ACA) are just a few of the healthcare standards and regulations that must be met during the intervention plan’s implementation (ACA). These rules and laws will set the bar for patient confidentiality, ease of access, and health insurance, all of which will affect the intervention strategy’s actual execution.

Potential Support

Government entities, healthcare providers, and community groups will all lend a hand in carrying out the intervention strategy. One possible source of financing and resources for implementing the intervention plan comes from government bodies like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Medical facilities can provide a hand by making their staff, facilities, and resources available to those in need. Patients and their loved ones may find help from community organizations that provide them with information and resources.

Policy Considerations

It is possible that drafting brand-new policies or reworking existing ones will be necessary to implement the intervention strategy. It’s possible, for instance, that new patient privacy, accessibility, and healthcare coverage laws may need to be formulated to put the intervention plan into action. Furthermore, the intervention plan’s execution may necessitate the revision of current policies to guarantee interprofessional collaboration among healthcare practitioners.

Part 4: Timelin

Month 1

Month 2

References

Havers, S. M., Kate Martin, E., Wilson, A., & Hall, L. (2020). A systematic review and meta-synthesis of policy intervention characteristics that influence the implementation of government-directed policy in the hospital setting: Implications for infection prevention and control.
Journal of Infection Prevention,
21(3), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757177420907696

Magwood, O., Riddle, A., Petkovic, J., Lytvyn, L., Khabsa, J., Atwere, P., Akl, E. A., Campbell, P., Welch, V., Smith, M., Mustafa, R. A., Limburg, H., Dans, L. F., Skoetz, N., Grant, S., Concannon, T. W., & Tugwell, P. (2022). Protocol: Barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement in health guideline development: A qualitative evidence synthesis.
Campbell Systematic Reviews,
18(2).

https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1237

Masefield, S. C., Msosa, A., Chinguwo, F. K., & Grugel, J. (2021). Stakeholder engagement in the health policy process in a low income country: A qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions of the challenges to effective inclusion in Malawi.
BMC Health Services Research,
21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07016-9

Orton, M., Agarwal, S., Muhoza, P., Vasudevan, L., & Vu, A. (2018). Strengthening delivery of health services using Digital Devices.
Global Health: Science and Practice,
6(Supplement 1). https://doi.org/10.9745/ghsp-d-18-00229

Votova, K., Laberge, A.-M., Grimshaw, J. M., & Wilson, B. (2019). Implementation science as a leadership capability to improve patient outcomes and value in healthcare.
Healthcare Management Forum,
32(6), 307–312.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0840470419867427

Develop a 4-page plan that will allow you to evaluate your intervention.

Introduction

Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment.

Once an intervention is planned and implemented it is important to evaluate the degree to which the outcomes of the project were achieved. By evaluating the desired outcomes of an intervention, it is possible to make more informed decisions about opportunities for continuous improvement. It is also possible to identify strategies and approaches that could be useful in improving one’s personal practice in other contexts or care areas.

Instructions

Part 1: Evaluation of Plan

· Define the outcomes that are the goal of an intervention plan.

· Create an evaluation plan to determine the impact of an intervention for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need.

Part 2: Discussion

Advocacy

· Analyze the nurse’s role in leading change and driving improvements in the quality and experience of care.

· Explain how the intervention plan affects nursing and interprofessional collaboration, and how the healthcare field gains from the plan.

Future Steps

· Explain how the current project could be improved upon to create a bigger impact on the target population as well as to take advantage of emerging technology and care models to improve outcomes and safety.

Reflection on Leading Change and Improvement

· Reflect on how the project has impacted your ability to lead change in personal practice and future leadership positions.

· Reflect on the ways in which the completed intervention, implementation, and evaluation plans can be transferred into your personal practice to drive quality improvement in other contexts.

Address Generally Throughout

· Integrate resources from diverse sources that illustrate support for all aspects of an evaluation plan for an intervention, as well as for professional discussion about the plan.

· Communicate the evaluation plan and discussion of the project in a professional way that helps the audience to understand how the outcomes will be evaluated, as well as what was learned through the project process.

Additional Requirements

· Length of submission: 4 double-spaced pages.

· The number of resources: 3–6 resources. (You may use resources previously cited in your literature review to contribute to this number. Your final project will require 12–18 unique resources.)

· Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.

· APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to the current APA style. Header formatting follows current APA levels.

· Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 points.

Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:

Turnitin Report

Formatting

Title Page

Citation

Outline

Place an Order