see attachment for instructions.
Research & Report
For your Journal Assignment, you should find
two articles that relates to the material covered in your reading this week:
· CHAPTER 6: High-Tech Investigations of Cyber Crime
· CHAPTER 7: Seizing, Imaging, and Analyzing Digital Evidence: Step-by-Step Guidelines
· CHAPTER 8: Digital Forensics Education, Training and Awareness
· CHAPTER 9: Understanding the Situational Awareness in Cybercrimes: Case Studies
· CHAPTER 10: Terrorist Use of the Internet
Use any peer reviewed resources (Keiser University Library sources or government websites) to find an article that discusses the same topic. Then write in an APA review of the article. You should submit
two of these. Submit them in the same document.
Requirements:
· Complete two article reviews.
·
Each review should have a minimum of 250-350 words.
· Each review should explain the significance of the article and relate it to your reading this week.
· Each review should end with your opinion on the pros or cons of the article being reviewed.
·
Note: Do NOT use any articles older than 5 years.
This field is always changing, so you should be using current information (no older than five years).
·
Note: Do NOT simply cut-and-paste from a website or from an article. Yes, you should be sources to find the information for this journal assignment, but do not simply cut-and-paste someone else’s words. As you review the article, put it in your own words. Be sure to cite in APA. If you copy and paste, you will NOT get credit for doing this. Your reviews must be your own words, thoughts, and analysis.
Resources:
·
Homeland Security Journal Rubric
Homeland Security Journal Rubric – Alternative Formats
· Example Student Journals:
·
Example 1 – “Florida Officials Seek Tourism Boost after Alberto Blows Through”
Example 1 – “Florida Officials Seek Tourism Boost after Alberto Blows Through” – Alternative Formats
·
Example 2 – “What We Investigate: Terrorism”
Example 2 – “What We Investigate: Terrorism” – Alternative Formats
·
image4.gif
image3.gif
image5.gif
Criteria No
Submission:
O Points
Emerging (F
through D range)
12 points
Satisfactory (C
Range)
14 points
Proficient (B Range)
16 points
Exemplary (A Range)
20 points
Criterion
score
20/20
Thesis and Ideas:
Explores the
appropriate topic based
on chapters read in the
week and displays
college level thinking
Submits the correct
number of Journal
articles.
Student did
not submit
the
assignment
Work does not
meet assignment
expectations;
shows little or no
understanding of
assignment
concepts
Assignment
partially meets
expectations with
minimal depth;
demonstrates a
limited
understanding of
the assignment
concepts
Assignment meets
expectations with
all components
being addressed;
demonstrates the
ability to evaluate
and apply key
assignments
Assignment exceeds
expectations with
exceptional depth;
presents all
requirements of the
assignment;
demonstrates the
ability to evaluate,
apply and synthesize
key assignment
concepts
20/20
Criteria
No
Submission:
O Points
Emerging (F
through D range)
12 points
Satisfactory (C
Range)
14 points
Proficient B Range
16 points
Exemplary (A Range
20 points
Criterion
score
20/20
Comprehension:
Synthesizes
information and
communicates it
through student’s own
thoughts and words.
Student did
not submit
the
assignment
Work does not
meet assignment
expectations;
shows little or no
understanding of
assignment
concepts
Assignment
partially meets
expectations with
minimal depth;
demonstrates a
limited
understanding of
the assignment
concepts
Assignment meets
expectations with
all components
being addressed;
demonstrates the
ability to evaluate
and apply key
assignments
Assignment exceeds
expectations with
exceptional depth;
presents all
requirements of the
assignment;
demonstrates the
ability to evaluate,
apply and synthesize
key assignment
concepts
20/20
Criteria No
Submission:
O Points
Emerging (F
through D range)
12 points
Satisfactory (C
Range)
14 points
Proficient (B Range)
16 points
Exemplary (A Range)
20 points
20/20
Evidence critical and
analytical skills
Student did
not submit
the
assignment
Work does not
meet assignment
expectations;
shows little or no
understanding of
assignment
concepts
Assignment
partially meets
expectations with
minimal depth;
demonstrates a
limited
understanding of
the assignment
concepts
Assignment meets
expectations with
all components
being addressed;
demonstrates the
ability to evaluate
and apply key
assignments
Assignment exceeds
expectations with
exceptional depth;
presents all
requirements of the
assignment;
demonstrates the
ability to evaluate,
apply and synthesize
key assignment
concepts
20/20
Criteria No
Submission:
0 Points
Emerging (F
through D range)
12 points
Satisfactory (C
Range)
14 points
Proficient B Range
16 points
Exemplary (A Range)
20 points
20/20
Research: Appropriate
use of scholarly sources
Student did
not submit
the
assignment
Work does not
meet assignment
expectations;
shows little or no
understanding of
assignment
concepts
Assignment
partially meets
expectations with
minimal depth;
demonstrates a
limited
understanding of
the assignment
concepts
Assignment meets
expectations with
all components
being addressed;
demonstrates the
ability to evaluate
and apply key
assignments
Assignment exceeds
expectations with
exceptional depth;
presents all
requirements of the
assignment;
demonstrates the
ability to evaluate,
apply and synthesize
key
20/20
Criteria No
Submission:
0 Points
Emerging (F
through D range)
6 points
Satisfactory (C
Range)
7 points
Proficient B Range
8 points
Exemplary (A Range)
10 points
10/10
Organization: Writing
demonstrates well-
developed body that
evidences each
element from the
thesis in succinct
paragraphs and each
Student did
not submit
the
assignment
Work does not
meet assignment
expectations;
shows little or no
understanding of
assignment
concepts
Assignment
partially meets
expectations with
minimal depth;
demonstrates a
limited
understanding of
Assignment meets
expectations with
all components
being addressed;
demonstrates the
ability to evaluate
Assignment exceeds
expectations with
exceptional depth;
presents all
requirements of the
assignment;
demonstrates the
10/10
paragraph supports the
thesis.
the assignment
concepts
and apply key
assignments
ability to evaluate,
apply and synthesize
key
Criteria No
Submission
0 Points
Emerging (F
through D range)
6 points
Satisfactory (C
Range)
7 points
Proficient (B Range)
8 points
Exemplary (A Range)
10 points
10/10
Used APA formatted
citations and
references and used
correct structural
formatting
Student did
not submit
the
assignment
No attempt at APA
formatting when
using references
APA is attempted
with numerous
errors
Using APA format
accurately; errors
are noticeable
Using APA format
proficiently, text is
basically error free
Overall Score
Emerging (F-D) Satisfactory
(C Range)
Proficient (B
range)
Exemplary (A
range)
Chapter 12: Structure for Managing Emergency Response
Article Name:
“Florida officials seek tourism boost after Alberto blows through”
Article Review:
The Emergency Operations Center should be the most important building of any community.
This is where all the knowledge and nuts and bolts to keep the safety, economy, and welfare of
all the citizens and dynamics of a city or county, flowing. Every part of our country has its own
hazards, from California and earthquakes, wildfires and tsunami threats, to hurricanes, tornadoes,
and floods in the South and Midwest. Every EOC has its own set of emergency plans based on
the threat assessment.
I bring up economy because you see it every storm season, disasters blow in and everyone flees,
including the tourists which would have spurred the economy but now are gone, and so is the
economy. Disasters not only pull down the economy, and the lack of needed tourism, but then is
the increased cost of preparing, mitigating, and recovery of disasters and emergencies. Hurricane
season started in the south, and now Florida is trying to pull back in tourists in between storms. I
understand that, but I also see a risk involved. According to one source, “As winds and rains let
up from Subtropical Storm Alberto, Florida officials Tuesday were quickly spinning ways to
draw tourists to areas that may have missed out on Memorial Day crowds” (Turner, 2018, para.
1). The Governor of Florida visited an EOC to thank them for a job well done for this first storm
as he was questioned about tourism efforts. He said, “The Legislature gave us $76 million again
this year (for visit Florida), and part of that money is to work on when we have something like
this, to let people know we’re back open for business” (Turner, 2018, para. 5). The EOC is the
hub and is excellent at tracking emergency and disaster situations before they happen, when
possible, and that success is shown by minimal loss of life and property.
When greed steps in, that is when you see tourism take a back seat, but most who have been
through the big storms know those risks, and you see a good attitude with the Governor of
Florida in this article who knows what his State is facing. It shows a good leader also who shows
appreciation to those he knows keeps the public safe.
WC 375
Turner, J. (2018, May 30). Florida officials seek tourism boost after Alberto blows through.
Florida Division of Emergency Management. Retrieved from
http://www.floridadisaster.gov/FloridaofficialsseektourismboostafterAlbertoblows
through
Chapter:
Chapter 1 – Defining Terrorism
Article Title:
“Terrorism”
Chapter 1 of the text goes into much detail about defining terrorism and the types of terrorism.
What exactly constitutes terrorism and why does it seem so complicated to define? This article
from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI, 2021) defines terrorism as a “contested term, with
no set definition for the concept or broad agreement among academic experts on its usage ”
(para. 1). Is it really that difficult to define? It’s a word and as such it should just be in any old
dictionary or textbook glossary and boom there’s the definition. Is it more complicated than that?
To answer my own question, yes, it is very complicated. But at least I’m not alone in the
complicatedness of defining terrorism as it seems like the FBI is having problems too. The article
notes that “the recent spate of extremist attacks in the United States and Europe have highlighted
the difficulty of defining what constitutes ‘terrorism’” (FBI, 2021, para. 2). Here, The FBI
focuses on recent examples extremism to attempt to answer the question, even giving the readers
an account of some of the recent terroristic attacks and how the relate to terrorism and
extremism. By the end of the article the question remains unclear and unanswered, making this
task of defining terrorism that much more confusing.
The pro of this article is that there were some real-world examples. These help show the
complicated nature of defining terrorism.
The article would have been more interesting if there were some frontline details, like the
definition from the FBI’s perspective, especially given it’s the leading legal enforcement
mechanism in the country.
Words: 270
Reference
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2021). What We Investigate: Terrorism. Retrieved from
https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/terrorism
Commented [JW1]: When citing from a webpage, you
must count the paragraphs and include a para. citation.
Commented [JW2]: Note how the quote within a quote
appears:
” ‘ ‘ ”
And note the citation here follows the quote since the
source was not mentioned before the quote.