Review the steps of the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) and reflect on the scenario presented.
Consider the benefits and challenges associated with involving a nurse leader on an implementation team for health information technology.
The Assignment: (2-3 pages not including the title and reference page)
In preparation of filling this role, develop a 2- to 3-page role description for a graduate-level nurse to guide his/her participation on the implementation team. The role description should be based on the SDLC stages and tasks and should clearly define how this individual will participate in and impact each of the following steps:
Planning and requirements definition
Analysis
Design of the new system
Implementation
Post-implementation support
Use APA format and include a title page and reference page.
Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.
1/30/23, 1:48 PM Module 5: Week 10: Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/22139/assignments/132964?module_item_id=464434 3/5
Criteria Ratings Pts
2
5 pts
25 pts
Develop a 2- to 3-page role
description for a graduate-
level nurse to guide his/her
participation on the
implementation team. The
role description should be
based on the Systems
Development Life Cycle
(SDLC) stages and tasks
and should clearly define
how this individual will
participate in and impact
each of the following
steps:· Planning and
requirements definition·
Analysis· Design of the
new system·
Implementation· Post-
implementation support
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
Using the
literature and
course
resources:…An
accurate and fully
developed role
description is
provided that
supports the role
of the nurse
informaticist on
the Systems
Development Life
Cycle stages
including how the
individual will
participate and
impact each of
these steps:
definition of
planning and
requirements.
22 to >19.0 pts
Good
Using the
literature and
course
resources:…A
role description is
provided that
supports the role
of the nurse
informaticist on
the Systems
Development Life
Cycle stages
including how the
individual will
participate and
impact each of
these steps:
definition of
planning and
requirements.
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response
elements are
superficially
addressed.
17 to >0 pts
Poor
The
response is
incomplete,
inaccurate,
or missing.
· Analysis· Design of the
new system
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
Using the
literature and
course
resources:…An
accurate and fully
developed role
description is
provided that
supports the role
of the nurse
informaticist on
the Systems
Development Life
Cycle stages
including how the
individual will
participate and
22 to >19.0 pts
Good
Using the
literature and
course
resources:…A
role description is
provided that
supports the role
of the nurse
informaticist on
the Systems
Development Life
Cycle stages
including how the
individual will
participate and
impact each of
these steps:
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response
elements are
superficially
addressed.
17 to >0 pts
Poor
The
response is
incomplete,
inaccurate,
or missing.
1/30/23, 1:48 PM Module 5: Week 10: Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/22139/assignments/132964?module_item_id=464434 4/5
Criteria Ratings Pts
25 pts
10 pts
impact each of
these steps:
analysis and
design of the new
system.
analysis and
design of the new
system.
· Implementation· Post-
implementation support
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
Using the
literature and
course
resources:…An
accurate and fully
developed role
description is
provided that
supports the role
of the nurse
informaticist on
the Systems
Development Life
Cycle stages
including how the
individual will
participate and
impact each of
these steps:
implementation
and post-
implementation
support.
22 to >19.0 pts
Good
Using the
literature and
course
resources:…A
role description is
provided that
supports the role
of the nurse
informaticist on
the Systems
Development Life
Cycle stages
including how the
individual will
participate and
impact each of
these steps:
implementation
and post-
implementation
support.
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response
elements are
superficially
addressed.
17 to >0 pts
Poor
The
response is
incomplete,
inaccurate,
or missing
Resources 10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
Assignment
includes: 3 or
more peer-
reviewed articles
and 2 or more
course resources.
8 to >7.0 pts
Good
Assignment
includes: 2
peer-reviewed
articles and 2
course
resources.
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair
Assignment
includes: 1
peer-reviewed
article and 1
course
resource.
6 to >0 pts
Poor
Assignment
includes: 1 or
no
resources.
1/30/23, 1:48 PM Module 5: Week 10: Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/22139/assignments/132964?module_item_id=464434 5/5
Total Points: 100
Criteria Ratings Pts
5 pts
5 pts
5 pts
Written Expression and
Formatting – Paragraph
Development and
Organization:Paragraphs
make clear points that
support well developed
ideas, flow logically, and
demonstrate continuity of
ideas. Sentences are
carefully focused–neither
long and rambling nor short
and lacking substance.
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity.
4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity 80%
of the time.
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity 60%-
79% of the time.
2 to >0 pts
Poor
Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity <
60% of the
time.
Written Expression and
Formatting – English writing
standards:Correct grammar,
mechanics, and proper
punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a few
(1-2) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Contains
several (3-4)
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.
2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (≥
5) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation errors
that interfere with
the reader’s
understanding.
Written Expression and
Formatting – APA:The paper
follows correct APA format
for title page, headings, font,
spacing, margins,
indentations, page numbers,
parenthetical/in-text
citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct
APA format with
no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a few
(1-2) APA format
errors.
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Contains several
(3-4) APA format
errors.
2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains
many (≥ 5)
APA format
errors.
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
