Submitted three quality postings (not just “I agree”). Post one answer to the question and at least two responses to your classmates. Question/Statement/Prompt.
Give an overview of a multicultural book you have or would like to use in your classroom. Discuss why you think this book would enhance multicultural thinking.
1.
I choose this book .
2.
I need writing answer about my classmate books (Please see attachment in the example)
https://www.google.com/books/edition/All_Kinds_of_Children/XU03EAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=multicultural+books+for+preschoolers&printsec=frontcover
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-9SQC1MMhs
EXAMPLE:
I need riting unswer about my classmate books
Give an overview of a multicultural book you have or would like to use in your classroom. Discuss why you think this book would enhance multicultural thinking.
The name of the book is “One Classroom many Cultures” by Elizabeth Massie. The book explains different cultures, holidays, food, language, and traditions. I love the way the book is illustrated and organized. You can clearly see each culture represented in a unique way. I think this book will enhance the multicultural thinking of my students by simply showing their traditions and cultures and language. We can talk about my student’s holidays and simply explore each other’s culture. They will be also able to explain their thought and what they think and what they liked. This book will show them that we are all different around the world and unique in our own way. They will be able to explore the cultures throughout the pictures that were illustrated by Jill Dubin. I enjoyed reading the explanation of each culture.
I’m attaching the website where you can enjoy of listening to the story.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnENd6MDCEs
Links to an external site.
|
Grading Rubric for Discussion Boards |
||||||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePromptness and Initiative |
0 pts Below Expectations No posting credit at all for postings outside of the date range. 1 pts Proficient Contributes but doesn’t meet the requirement of responding to two peer postings, and /or posts all requirements on the same day of the week. 2 pts Exemplary Posts original contribution, responds to at least two peers postings, and posts on at least two different days of the week. |
2 pts | ||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics of Writing |
0 pts Below Expectations Poor spelling and grammar in posts; format is extremely hard to read would be deemed as unprofessional documentation by common business standards. 1 pts Proficient An error in spelling and grammar, yet overall format is clear. 2 pts Exemplary Submissions are grammatically correct, posts with rare misspellings, format is easy to read/ professional delivery |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelevance of Post |
0 pts Below Expectations Posts topics which do not relate to the discussion; remarks are not backed up by a reference; rehashes or summarizes other postings; unclear connection to topic; minimal expression of opinions or ideas. 1 pts Proficient Most posts are short in length and offer no further insight into the topic; opinions and ideas are stately clearly with occasional lack of connection to topic, and/or provides limited citations (from text, website, etc) for the community to reference. 2 pts Exemplary Consistently posts topics related to assigned topic; cites at least one but preferably several credible references related to topic (text, website, or other credible / scholarly references); expresses opinions and ideas in a clear and concise manner with obvious connection to topic. |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreating Community |
0 pts Below Expectations Argumentative or abrasive. No peer interaction. 1 pts Proficient Displays an effort to become involved with group; interacts with others. This category is concerned with quality of interactions. 2 pts Exemplary Frequently attempts to motivate the group discussion; presents creative approaches to topic, can differ or counter peers points with diplomacy, if applicable. Refers to peer contributions. Creates community in the discussion. This category is concerned with quality of interactions. |
|||||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking/Analysis |
0 pts Below Expectations Makes errors in interpreting topics; opinion based comments only; superficial commentary. 1 pts Proficient Accurately interprets topic; uses main points of information from resources/ references; may repeat the ideas of other but attempts to offer new insight; response does not provoke significant new thinking or further discussion. 2 pts Exemplary Interprets topic in accurate and insightful ways. Uses information thoughtfully, in a ways that are factually relevant and accurate; postings shows analysis, might offer alternatives or creative viewpoints based on concrete evidence. |
|||||
|
Total Points: 10 |
image1
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
