Hi, please.Q – Read the discussion below and prepare a Reply to this discussion post with comments
that further and advance the discussion topic.
Please provide the references you used.
Ensure zero plagiarism.
Word limit: 50 to 70 words please do not exceed the limit.
Support Department and Joint Cost Allocation
Service departments play a crucial role in supporting a company’s operations, but determining
how to allocate their costs can be a complex task. This difficulty arises from the intricate
relationships these departments have with other departments within the company. Three
primary methods exist for cost allocation: direct, sequential, and reciprocal. Direct allocation is
the simplest approach, but it may not be the most accurate. Sequential allocation takes into
account the relationships between departments but only in one direction. In contrast, reciprocal
allocation is the most precise method, but it requires a more challenging calculation process.
(Christensen & Schneider, 2017)
When multiple products are created through joint manufacturing processes, they all incur joint
costs. Determining the cost of each joint product is crucial for decision-making purposes, such
as setting appropriate selling prices. However, before the split-off point, these joint costs cannot
be separated. Once the split occurs, costs can then be traced back to individual products. To
allocate the joint costs, there are four commonly used methods: Physical units, Weighted
average, Market value at split-off, and Net realizable value. Each of these methods is designed
to allocate inseparable costs, and the most appropriate method may vary depending on the
specific production process. (Warren & Tayler, 2018)
When it comes to assigning costs in a paper manufacturing support department, there
are three methods for distributing support department costs to production departments or
support activity costs to production activities: the direct method, the sequential method, and
the reciprocal services method. When a single production process yields several outputs, this is
known as joint goods and the expenses incurred during the production process are joint costs.
New manufacturing costs incurred once goods have split off from the manufacturing process
are no longer regarded as joint costs. Joint expenses can be assigned using physical units,
weighted average, market value at split-off, or net realizable value. However, none of these
methods can accurately depict the actual cost of a single joint product since they all allocate
costs that are not separable. To summarize, choosing the appropriate method for the process
support department or joint costs is not a simple task. It depends on various factors including
the number of products, the relationship between departments, the level of accuracy desired
by management, and the availability of manpower to perform the calculations. (Warren &
Tayler, 2018)
For manufacturing professionals, having a thorough understanding of joint and byproduct costing methodology is critical. Through the accurate allocation of expenses to each
product, cost accountants can take into account the resources used and the value of the goods
produced. This method also enables businesses to assess the profitability of each product
created using a shared set of resources or raw materials, helping them make informed decisions
when selecting products to manufacture and market. Furthermore, joint and by-product costing
is often essential for complying with tax regulations, especially in businesses where multiple
products are created using the same pool of raw materials or resources. By understanding this
method, businesses can ensure they remain compliant with tax laws and avoid potential legal
issues. Proper financial reporting also necessitates joint and by-product costing, as it assures
that costs are equitably assigned to each product. This can improve the reliability of financial
statements and provide a more accurate depiction of the financial performance of the business.
Lastly, joint and by-product costing can help companies manage their resources more effectively
by revealing the resources required to produce each product, presenting opportunities to
reduce waste and enhance industrial efficiency. Overall, comprehending joint and by-product
costing is vital for manufacturing professionals seeking to estimate costs accurately, evaluate
profitability, comply with tax laws, report financial data, and manage resources effectively.
(Wann, 2023)
References:
Christensen, D. & Schneider, P. (2017). Allocating Service Department Costs with Excel. Institute
of Management Accountants, Inc. https://www.sfmagazine.com/articles/2017/may/allocatingservice-department-costs-with-excel/?psso=true
Warren, C. S. & Tayler, W. B. (2018). Managerial Accounting (15e). Cengage Learning, Inc.
Wann, B. (2023). Joint and By-Product Costing- Explained With Examples. Benjamin Wann.
https://benjaminwann.com/blog/joint-and-by-product-costing-explained-with-examples